London Borough of Croydon (23 004 157)

Category : Adult care services > Safeguarding

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jul 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s alleged failure to safeguard Ms X because there is not enough evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complains the Council failed to safeguard Ms X from attacks from another resident in her accommodation, resulting in trauma, distress and anxiety.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs Y and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Relevant law

  1. A section 42 Care Act 2014 safeguarding enquiry is the action taken by a council in response to a concern of abuse or neglect.
  2. A council must make s42 enquiries if it believes an adult in its area is experiencing, or is at risk of, abuse or neglect.
  3. The purpose of an enquiry is to decide whether the council or another organisation, or person, should do something to protect the vulnerable adult.

My analysis

  1. The Council provides adult social care services to Ms X, who lives in Council B.
  2. It has a duty to ensure Ms X’s care needs are met and should ensure the suitability of any accommodation it has arranged.
  3. Mrs Y says the Council placed Ms X in her current accommodation.
  4. The documents seen show the Council made efforts to contact Ms X in response to her concerns about another resident, though these were unsuccessful.
  5. The Council also notified Council B, as the council responsible for making any s42 enquiry. Any further complaint about safeguarding would need to be raised to Council B.
  6. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings