Oxfordshire County Council (23 000 227)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s invoicing system. This is because further investigation could not add to the Council’s response or make a finding of the kind Mrs B wants.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complained the Council’s invoicing system is flawed. Mrs B says the Council often sends out incorrect invoices for her daughter’s, Ms C’s, contribution towards her care but when the invoices are wrong, it is unable send a further invoice to reflect the amendments because the system does not allow it. Mrs B says it is difficult to keep track of what Ms C should pay when the Council continues to send out incorrect invoices and wants it to implement a system that can generate amended invoices.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council apologised it cannot produce the additional invoices Mrs B wants. It explained once monthly invoices have been generated its system does not allow for a further amended invoice to be sent. It says it will monitor this and use Mrs B’s feedback with partner agencies when looking at making improvements to the system. We could not add to this or make a different finding even if we investigated.
  2. The Council says Ms C pays a contribution towards the cost of her care, but it is not pro-rata. So on occasions when she only attend college part of the week Ms C is still liable to pay her full contribution because the amount she contributes does not exceed the full cost of the care she receives. It says invoices should only be generated in term time when Ms C attends college and there were occasions last year and more recently February this year, when Ms C was charged for weeks she did not attend college. The Council says it has now set up a ‘suspension’ in the system to reflect term dates so future invoices should be correct. The Council provided Mrs B with a table showing dates and the outstanding amount owed so she is now clear about what is outstanding and needs to be paid. We could achieve no more than this even if we investigated.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because further investigation could not add to the Council’s response or make a different finding of the kind Mrs B wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings