London Borough of Lewisham (23 009 344)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to issue her son with an Education Health and Care Plan. The is because it is reasonable for Miss X to use her right of appeal to a tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Miss X, complained the Council has refused to issue her son with an Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.
  3. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint.
  2. Parents unhappy with a council’s decision not to issue an EHC Plan can appeal to the SEND Tribunal. We expect people to use this right unless we consider it unreasonable for them to do so. The Tribunal can say if the Council should issue an EHC Plan. We have no powers to do this. The Tribunal can give Miss X the outcome she wants. An investigation by the Ombudsman cannot. I see no reason Miss X should not use the appeal rights available to her and so we will not investigate.
  3. Miss X is also unhappy about previous decisions not to issue her son with an EHC Plan. But the Council took those decisions more than 12 months ago and so the exception at paragraph 4 applies. These issues are late. But even if this was not the case, we would not investigate. This is because Miss X had the right to appeal those decisions to the SEND Tribunal and it was reasonable for her to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is reasonable for Miss X to appeal to a tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings