Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (20 013 045)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about missing items belonging to his deceased mother. This is because the injustice is not significant enough. Even if we were to investigate, we could not say what happened to the items or provide a worthwhile outcome for Mr X.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mr X, complained about missing items belonging to his deceased mother (Mrs Y). Mr X noticed the items were missing after he collected his mother’s possessions from a residential care provider. The missing items include two bottles of alcoholic drinks, a small Christmas tree, and two bottles of soft drinks. Mr X is unhappy with the response he has received from the care provider which referred to “differing accounts”. Mr X is worried other residents could have items stolen.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on a draft decision and took into account his comments.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I understand how upset Mr X is that some of his mother’s possessions are missing. But the injustice to Mr X is not enough to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman. Even if we were to investigate, we could never say what happened to the items. We could not therefore achieve a worthwhile outcome. I know Mr X is worried other residents of the care provider could be affected in a similar way. But we do not investigate complaints about what might happen. Mr X is also unhappy with how the care provider and council dealt with his complaint. It is not, however, a good use of our resources to investigate complaint handling as a standalone issue. We will not therefore investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because the injustice is not significant enough and we could not achieve a worthwhile outcome for Mr X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings