Kent County Council (21 003 915)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to hold an Education Health and Care Plan annual review on time. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate as the Tribunal is currently considering the case.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, says the Council failed to hold his child, B’s, Education Health and Care Plan’s (EHC Plan) annual review at the right time.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered Mr X’s comments on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the Council should have held an annual review for his son, B, in February 2021. He says the Council issued an EHC Plan in March 2021 which referred to the annual review which had never been held. Mr X says he appealed to SEND in March 2021 for the Tribunal to decide if an EHC Plan issued in January 2021 met B’s needs. Mr X says that if the Council had held the February 2021 annual review he believes his appeal may not have been necessary.
  2. We cannot investigate issues which Mr X has appealed to the Tribunal about. Mr X has appealed whether the EHC Plan meets his child’s needs. His complaint to us is that if the annual review had been held that appeal would not be necessary because the Council would have changed the EHC Plan to the way Mr X prefers. This means Mr X’s complaint is very closely linked to the appeal and cannot be separated.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because Mr X’s complaint is too closely linked to an ongoing Tribunal appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings