Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (21 003 571)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of his daughter’s Education, Health and Care Plan as he has a right of appeal to SEND Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has dealt with his request for clarification on how it reached decisions about his daughter’s Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) as a complaint. Mr X says the Council has been needlessly obstructive and as a result of dealing with his correspondence as a complaint he has missed out on an opportunity to appeal the EHCP.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council wrote to Mr X on 19 January 2021 with its decision on his daughter’s EHCP. The letter was accompanied by information about mediation and Mr X’s right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal as well as the timescales involved.
  2. It was Mr X’s choice to write to the Council for clarification. He was aware of his right to ask for mediation and his right to appeal to the SEND Tribunal as well as the timescales. I consider it was reasonable to expect him to pursue these if he was unhappy with his daughter’s EHCP. Therefore, we cannot investigate this complaint.
  3. I understand that Mr X is unhappy with the way the Council handled his complaint. However, we will not investigate how a Council has handled a complaint where we cannot investigate the substantive matter complained of. In this case the provision set out in his daughter’s EHCP.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he had a right of appeal to SEND Tribunal and it was reasonable to expect him to use this right.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings