[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 134 (Monday, July 13, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41906-41910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14886]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0180; Project Identifier 2017-CE-043-AD; Amendment
39-21146; AD 2020-13-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Daher Aircraft Design, LLC (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Quest Aircraft Design, LLC), Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Daher Aircraft Design, LLC (type certificate previously held by Quest
Aircraft Design, LLC), Model KODIAK 100 airplanes. This AD was prompted
by reports of cracks found in certain nose landing gear (NLG) forks.
This AD requires a one-time inspection to determine if an affected NLG
fork is installed, repetitive inspections of the affected NLG fork for
cracks, repetitive inspections of the shimmy damper bracket for
looseness, and of the shimmy damper system for damaged components if an
affected NLG fork is installed, and rework/replacement of parts as
necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective August 17, 2020.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 17,
2020.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Kodiak Aircraft Company, Inc., 1200 Turbine Drive, Sandpoint,
Idaho 83864; phone: (208) 263-1111 or 1 (866) 263-1112; email:
[email protected]; internet: http://Kodiak.aero/support. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 816-329-4148. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0180.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0180; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wade Sullivan, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3530; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Quest Aircraft
Design, LLC (type certificate now held by Daher Aircraft Design, LLC),
Model KODIAK 100 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register
on March 8, 2018 (83 FR 9820). The NPRM was prompted by reports of
cracks on the NLG fork on Model KODIAK 100 airplanes. The NPRM proposed
to require a one-time inspection to determine if an affected NLG fork
is installed, repetitive inspections of the affected NLG fork for
cracks, repetitive inspections of the shimmy damper bracket for
looseness if an affected NLG fork is installed, and rework/replacement
of parts as necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent separation
of the NLG fork and consequent reduced control on landing. If the NLG
fork separates on an unimproved surface, the risk of the NLG digging in
and the airplane overturning on the ground increases.
Since the FAA issued the NPRM, the type certificate holder for the
Model KODIAK 100 airplane changed from Quest Aircraft Design, LLC
(Quest), to Daher Aircraft Design, LLC. This final rule reflects that
change and updates the contact information to obtain service
documentation.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Revise Proposed AD To Lessen Economic Impact
Quest requested numerous changes to paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) of
the proposed AD. In support, Quest stated that these changes would
address all sources of shimmy and lessen the economic impact to
operators in international locations where nondestructive testing (NDT)
inspection methods are less accessible.
First, Quest requested that the FAA change paragraphs (h)(1) and
(i)(1) of the proposed AD to require the initial inspections only if
there is shimmy. Quest stated that its analysis and review of the NLG
fork determined that extended shimmy with the existing design (type A
NLG fork) could result in fatigue cracks at the locations reported.
The FAA disagrees with this request because there is no regulatory
requirement for all pilots to report a nosewheel shimmy event. If the
initial inspections were conditional on reported shimmy events, the
unsafe condition would go unaddressed each time a pilot forgot or
neglected to report an event.
Quest also requested that the FAA revise the service information
that would be required throughout the proposed AD to allow later
revisions.
The FAA disagrees with this request. Requiring the use of a service
document that does not yet exist at the time an AD is published
violates 1 CFR 51.1(f), regarding approval by the Director of the
Federal Register of a publication incorporated by reference. In order
for operators to use later revisions of a referenced document (issued
after the publication of the AD), either the AD must be revised to
reference the specific later revisions, or operators must request
approval to use a later revision as an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) using the procedures in paragraph (l) of this AD.
[[Page 41907]]
Quest requested that the FAA revise paragraph (h)(2) of the
proposed AD to remove the identification of the replacement part so
that replacement of a cracked NLG fork is not limited to NLG fork P/N
100-410-7013 (type B).
The FAA disagrees. The type B NLG fork, P/N 100-410-7013, is the
only replacement option that has been shown to address the unsafe
condition. The FAA disagrees with relying solely on the repetitive
inspections without requiring replacement with the type B NLG fork if a
crack is found. If a different option provides an acceptable level of
safety, an operator may request an AMOC using the procedures in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
Quest requested that the FAA revise paragraph (i)(1) of the
proposed AD to change the requirement to inspect the shimmy damper
bracket for looseness using revision 21 of the maintenance manual to a
requirement to perform the nosewheel shimmy system troubleshooting
procedure in revision 24 (or later) of the maintenance manual. In
support of this request, Quest stated that shimmy can result from a
wide range of factors, and thus a less focused procedure is more
appropriate.
The FAA disagrees with this request. The FAA has determined that
the procedures to inspect the shimmy damper bracket and replace damaged
components adequately address the unsafe condition. Performing the
entire nosewheel shimmy system troubleshooting procedure in Revision 24
goes beyond what is required and is not necessary to address the unsafe
condition.
Quest further requested that the FAA revise paragraph (j) of the
proposed AD to require replacement of the NLG fork using the procedures
in the maintenance manual, instead of the procedures in Quest Field
Service Instruction FSI-147.
The FAA partially agrees. Replacing an NLG fork with a type B NLG
fork may be accomplished using the Quest maintenance manual or other
standard maintenance practices. The FAA has changed paragraph (j) of
this AD accordingly.
Request To Extend the Repetitive Inspection Intervals
Quest, New Tribes Mission (Papua New Guinea) Ltd (New Tribes
Mission), and SIL Aviation requested that the FAA extend the repetitive
inspection intervals for the NDT inspection of the NLG fork. In the
NPRM, the FAA proposed a 100-hour TIS interval; the commenters
requested an interval ranging from 200 to 1,000 hours TIS. According to
New Tribes Mission, extending the repetitive interval would align with
other scheduled Kodiak inspection items and still provide a measure of
assurance that no cracks are forming, while reducing labor time and
costs and increasing aircraft availability for operators. Quest stated
that the 30-second duration of a severe shimmy occurrence used in its
original analysis was extraordinarily long, and suggested that half
that duration would still provide a reasonable and conservative number
for analysis and allow increasing the repetitive inspection interval to
200 hours TIS.
The FAA agrees with the analysis supporting an increase in the
repetitive inspection intervals to 200 hours TIS and has revised
paragraphs (h)(1) and (i)(1) of this AD accordingly. The FAA has
determined there is insufficient data to support increasing the
repetitive inspection intervals beyond 200 hours TIS. The FAA will
consider a further extension of this repetitive interval, via further
rulemaking or approval of an AMOC, if analysis of the nosewheel shimmy
and the effect of the NLG gravel deflectors shows that safety would be
ensured by a longer interval.
Request To Extend Repetitive Interval Based on Shimmy Documentation
Quest requested that the FAA allow a longer repetitive inspection
interval of 800 hours TIS for operators that implement a shimmy-
occurrence documentation procedure and where no severe shimmy (longer
than 3 seconds per landing) occurs. The commenter suggested that it was
important for international operators to include this option in the AD
instead of through an AMOC because of the various international
regulations and associated complexities in obtaining approvals.
The FAA disagrees with this request. Although the engineering
analysis provided by Quest suggests that cracks are more likely to
develop in airplanes that experience nosewheel shimmy, there is no
regulatory requirement for all pilots to report or record a shimmy
event. Even if an operator were to adopt and implement a procedure,
there is no reliable way to determine if an airplane has experienced a
previous shimmy event. A new owner of an airplane would have no way of
determining if the airplane had experienced a shimmy event with the
previous owner based on a review of the maintenance records. The FAA
has not changed this AD based on this comment.
Request To Limit Applicability to Airplanes With NLG Gravel Deflector
New Tribes Mission and SIL Aviation requested that the FAA limit
the applicability of the proposed AD to airplanes with a supplemental
type certificate (STC) for an NLG gravel deflector installed. The
commenters stated that the four instances of cracking on the NLG fork
were limited to airplanes of the same operator, operated in the same
location, with an STC for an NLG gravel deflector installed. New Tribes
Mission noted that the extra weight of the gravel deflector could
exacerbate the effects of the shimmy. Both commenters stated that other
operators in similar locations and conditions, with airplanes that had
accumulated more hours TIS and landings but without the gravel
deflector installed, have not reported any signs of cracking on
airplanes.
The FAA does not agree with this request. Although Quest's analysis
suggests that nosewheel shimmy contributes to the cracking, there is
insufficient data to make that conclusion specifically for airplanes
with the gravel deflector installed. Should Quest complete a shimmy
analysis of the effect of the NLG gravel deflectors, the FAA will
determine whether to take further rulemaking action.
The FAA has not changed this AD based on this comment.
Request To Allow Credit for Inspections Already Completed
Quest requested that the FAA provide relief from the initial
requirement to perform an NDT inspection within 25 hours if an operator
has previously complied with the inspection. Quest stated that such
operators should not be required to perform another ``initial''
inspection.
Paragraph (f) of this AD requires compliance unless already done.
Thus, the AD already allows operators to take credit for the initial
NDT inspection if it is done before the effective date of the AD.
Operators must then repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed
200 hours TIS. No changes to this AD are necessary based on this
comment.
Comments Regarding the Type of Inspection
SIL Aviation and New Tribes Mission stated that the NDT inspection
methods required by the AD are not readily available and/or are cost
prohibitive. SIL Aviation noted that the type of inspection would be
very costly to its operation. The FAA infers that these commenters
would like the AD to allow the inspection using a different method.
The FAA acknowledges the commenters' concerns about the costs
associated with this AD. However, the FAA has determined that the
required
[[Page 41908]]
actions in this AD are necessary to address the unsafe condition. The
FAA considered several possible NDT methods and determined that the
inspection options (fluorescent penetrant, dye penetrant, or eddy
current inspection) for the inspection required by this AD are the most
cost effective and simple to perform in the field while still providing
an adequate level of safety. The dye penetrant kits are available from
several sources. Under the provisions of paragraph (l) of this AD,
operators may request approval of an AMOC for a different inspection
method if that method provides the same or higher level of crack
detection.
Other Changes to the Proposed AD
In the NPRM, the FAA proposed that paragraph (h)(2) require
replacing a cracked NLG fork by following section 5. Instructions in
Quest Aircraft Field Service Instruction FSI-147, Revision 00 (not
dated), and paragraph (i)(3) require replacing damaged components by
following pages 32_110 and 32_111, section 3252, Shimmy Damper, in
Chapter 32, Landing Gear, of Quest Aircraft Company Kodiak 100
Maintenance Manual, Revision No. 21, dated February 15, 2017. The FAA
has revised paragraphs (h)(2) and (i)(3) in this AD to remove the
incorporation by reference of the specified service information to
allow the actions to be done using standard maintenance practices.
The FAA has also clarified the proposed requirements in paragraph
(i). Paragraph (i)(1) of the proposed AD specified inspecting the
shimmy damper bracket for looseness by following pages 32_110 and
32_111, section 3252, Shimmy Damper, found in Chapter 32, Landing Gear,
of Quest Aircraft Company Kodiak 100 Maintenance Manual, Revision No.
21, dated February 15, 2017. Section 3252 contains a broader inspection
procedure of the shimmy damper system and not only an inspection of the
bracket for looseness. Paragraph (i)(3) of the proposed AD then
specified corrective action for damaged components in the shimmy damper
system as a result of the inspection in paragraph (i)(1). The FAA has
revised paragraph (i)(1) in this AD to clarify that the entire
inspection of the shimmy damper system is required.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these changes:
[Agr]re consistent with the proposal in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any burden upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Quest Aircraft Field Service Instruction FSI-147,
Revision 00, Release Date January 29, 2018, which provides instructions
for inspection and, if necessary, replacement of the NLG fork. The FAA
reviewed pages 32_110 and 32_111, section 3252, Shimmy Damper, in
Chapter 32, Landing Gear, of Quest Aircraft Company Kodiak 100
Maintenance Manual, Revision No. 21, dated February 15, 2017, which
contains procedures for inspecting the shimmy damper system. The FAA
also reviewed Quest Aircraft Field Service Instruction FSI-146,
Revision 00, Release Date April 18, 2017, which provides instructions
for modifying the shimmy damper attach bracket. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 116 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determine if type A or type B 1 work-hour x $85 Not applicable............ $85 $9,860
NLG fork is installed. per hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
additional inspections, replacements, and modifications that would be
required based on the results of the NLG fork type determination. The
FAA has no way of determining the number of airplanes that might need
these inspections, replacements, and modifications:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of the NLG fork for 4 work-hours x Not applicable........... $340 per inspection cycle.
cracks. $85 per hour =
$340.
Replacement of the NLG fork... 4 work-hours x $7,002.36................ $7,342.36.
$85 per hour =
$340.
Inspection of the shimmy 1 work-hour x $85 Not applicable........... $85 per inspection cycle.
damper system including the per hour = $85.
bracket.
Rework of the shimmy damper 4 work-hours x $127.33.................. $467.33.
bracket. $85 per hour =
$340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the
agency to provide cost estimates for replacing damaged components
specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
[[Page 41909]]
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2020-13-01 Quest Aircraft Design, LLC: Amendment 39-21146; Docket
No. FAA-2018-0180; Project Identifier 2017-CE-043-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective August 17, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Daher Aircraft Design, LLC (type certificate
previously held by Quest Aircraft Design, LLC), Model KODIAK 100
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 32, Landing Gear.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports from the manufacturer of fatigue
cracks on the nose landing gear (NLG) fork. The FAA is issuing this
AD to detect and prevent fatigue cracking of the NLG fork. The
unsafe condition, if not corrected, could result in separation of
the NLG fork with consequent reduced control on landing. If the NLG
fork separates on an unimproved surface, the risk of the NLG digging
in and the airplane overturning on the ground increases.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection for Type of NLG Fork
Within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS) after August 17, 2020 (the
effective date of this AD), inspect the airplane to determine if an
NLG fork part number (P/N) 100-410-7001 (type A) or an NLG fork P/N
100-410-7013 (type B) is installed. If you determine that an NLG
fork P/N 100-410-7013 (type B) is installed during the inspection,
no further action is required by this AD. If a review of the
maintenance records can identify the P/N NLG fork that is installed,
you may use a maintenance records review in lieu of inspecting the
airplane to determine if an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7001 (type A) or an
NLG fork P/N 100-410-7013 (type B) is installed.
(h) Inspection of the NLG Fork for Cracks
(1) If you determine that an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7001 (type A)
is installed during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, within 25 hours TIS after August 17, 2020 (the effective date of
this AD) and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 200 hours TIS, do
a fluorescent penetrant, dye penetrant, or open-hole eddy current
inspection of the NLG fork for cracks by following section 5.
Instructions in Quest Aircraft Field Service Instruction FSI-147,
Revision 00, Release Date January 29, 2018.
(2) If you find any cracks of the NLG fork during any inspection
required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, before further flight,
replace the NLG fork with an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7013 (type B).
Replacement of the NLG fork with an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7013 (type
B) terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraphs
(h)(1) and (i)(1) of this AD.
(i) Inspection of the Shimmy Damper Bracket
(1) If you have not replaced an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7001 (type
A) per the initial inspection and replacement requirements in
paragraph (h) of this AD, then within 25 hours TIS after August 17,
2020 (the effective date of this AD) and thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 200 hours TIS (until the NLG fork is replaced with a P/N
100-410-7013 (type B) fork), inspect the shimmy damper bracket for
looseness, and inspect the shimmy damper system for damaged (loose,
leaking, corroded, or worn) components, by following pages 32_110
and 32_111, section 3252, Shimmy Damper, found in Chapter 32,
Landing Gear, of Quest Aircraft Company Kodiak 100 Maintenance
Manual, Revision No. 21, dated February 15, 2017.
(2) If a loose shimmy damper bracket is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, rework the
shimmy damper bracket with interference-fit bolts by following Quest
Aircraft Field Service Instruction FSI-146, Revision 00, Release
Date April 18, 2017. Reworking the shimmy damper bracket with the
interference-fit bolts terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
(3) If any other damaged components are found in the shimmy
damper system during any inspection required by paragraph (i)(1) of
this AD, before further flight, replace the damaged components.
(j) Optional Terminating Action
In lieu of the NLG fork and shimmy damper bracket inspections
required by paragraphs (h)(1) and (i)(1) of this AD, you may replace
the NLG fork P/N 100-410-7001 (type A) with an NLG fork P/N 100-410-
7013 (type B). This replacement terminates the inspection
requirements of this AD, and no further actions are required.
(k) Restriction of NLG Fork P/N 100-410-7001 (Type A) Installation
Once an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7013 (type B) is installed on an
airplane, do not install an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7001 (type A). If
an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7013 (type B) is removed from the airplane
for any reason (for example, to install floats), you must reinstall
an NLG fork P/N 100-410-7013 (type B) when operating with wheels.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD. Information may also
be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(m) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Wade Sullivan,
Aerospace Engineer, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA,
[[Page 41910]]
Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206-231-3530; email: [email protected].
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Pages 32_110 and 32_111, section 3252, Shimmy Damper,
Chapter 32, Landing Gear, of Quest Aircraft Company Kodiak 100
Maintenance Manual, Revision No. 21, dated February 15, 2017.
(ii) Quest Aircraft Field Service Instruction FSI-146, Revision
00, Release Date April 18, 2017.
Note 1 to paragraph (n)(2)(ii) of this AD: The Release Date is
a pen-and-ink addition that appears only on the Revision Notice
transmitted with FSI-146.
(iii) Quest Aircraft Field Service Instruction FSI-147, Revision
00, Release Date January 29, 2018.
Note 2 to paragraph (n)(2)(iii) of this AD: The Release Date is
a pen-and-ink addition that appears only on the Revision Notice
transmitted with FSI-147.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Kodiak Aircraft Company, Inc., 1200 Turbine Drive, Sandpoint, Idaho
83864; phone: (208) 263-1111 or 1 (866) 263-1112; email:
[email protected]; internet: http://Kodiak.aero/support.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on June 9, 2020.
Ross Landes,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-14886 Filed 7-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P