[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58636-58638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23788]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0719; Product Identifier 2019-NM-137-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by a report of failure of a wing strut leak test due to a
missing bolt on the firewall. This proposed AD would require a one-time
leak test of the strut upper spar areas for the left and right wing
struts, and corrective action if necessary. The FAA is proposing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by December
16, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110 SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0719; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tak Kobayashi, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3553; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0719;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-137-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The agency specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https:/
/
[[Page 58637]]
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Discussion
The FAA received a report indicating failure of a wing strut leak
test due to a missing bolt on the firewall. Failure during manufacture
to install a bolt that plugs a strut firewall penetration would result
in a hole in the firewall. This condition, if not addressed, could
allow flammable fluid leakage in the strut area. This leakage could
overwhelm the drainage provision, enter the engine compartment, and
result in an uncontrollable engine fire and consequent structural
failure of the wing.
FAA's Determination
The FAA is proposing this AD because the agency evaluated all the
relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require a one-time leak test of the strut
upper spar areas for the left and right wing struts, and corrective
action if necessary.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD would affect 2 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The agency estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255........................... $0 $255 $510
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition action that would be required based on the results of any
proposed actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need this on-condition action:
Estimated Costs of On-Condition Action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Labor cost Parts cost product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = Minimal............... $85
$85.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2019-0719; Product Identifier
2019-NM-137-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by December 16, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes,
certificated in any category, line numbers 6, 11, 17, 19, 20, 21,
23, 25 through 30 inclusive, and 32 through 38 inclusive.
[[Page 58638]]
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54, Nacelles/
Pylons.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of failure of a wing strut leak
test due to a missing bolt on the firewall. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address a hole in the firewall, which could allow flammable
fluid leakage in the strut area. This leakage could overwhelm the
drainage provision, enter the engine compartment, and result in an
uncontrollable engine fire and consequent structural failure of the
wing.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Leak Test and Corrective Action
Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD: Do a one-
time leak (functional) test of the strut upper spar areas for the
left and right wing struts, by doing the actions specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (5) of this AD. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this test if it can be
conclusively determined from that review that the leak test was
previously accomplished and successfully completed.
(1) Put a plug in the strut forward drain outlet (this drain
outlet is labeled as ``pylon strut''). Put an empty container below
the strut forward drain outlet to collect water drained through this
outlet.
(2) Apply 381 to 387 fluid ounces (11.3 to 11.4 liters) of water
in 2.5 to 3.5 minutes, to the strut upper spar (strut areas between
the forward and mid-vapor barriers).
(3) Make sure that no leakage occurred after doing the action
specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.
(4) Remove the plug from the strut forward drain outlet and make
sure that the water is drained through the strut forward drain
outlet only.
(5) After 3 minutes from accomplishing the action specified in
paragraph (g)(4) of this AD, measure the water collected in the
container, and do the applicable actions specified in paragraphs
(g)(5)(i) through (iii) of this AD.
(i) If leaks were found, do corrective action before further
flight using a method approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(ii) If no leaks were found and less than 354 fluid ounces (10.5
liters) of water is collected in the container, do corrective action
before further flight using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(ii) Before further flight after accomplishing any corrective
action required by paragraph (g)(5)(i) or (ii) of this AD, repeat
the actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (5) of this AD
until successful completion of the test (i.e., no leaks are found
and 354 fluid ounces (10.5 liters) of water or more is measured in
the container).
Note 1 to paragraph (g): Additional guidance for performing the
leak (functional) test can be found in Boeing Model 787 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual (AMM), 54-65-01, Strut Spar--Upper--Functional
Test.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Tak Kobayashi,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-
3553; email: [email protected].
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on October 24, 2019.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-23788 Filed 10-31-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P