[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 17, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15087-15092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05477]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. CDC-2020-0024]
RIN 0920-AA71
Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins;
Biennial Review
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 351a of the Public Health Service
Act, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS; hereafter referred to as
HHS/CDC) has initiated a review of the HHS list of biological agents
and toxins that have the potential to pose a severe threat to public
health and safety (HHS select agents and toxins). This review was
initiated within two years of the completion of the previous review. In
reviewing the list, HHS/CDC is considering whether to propose amending
the HHS list of select agents and toxins.
DATES: Comments should be received on or before May 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2020-
0024 or Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) 0920-AA71, by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Division of Select Agents and Toxins, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H21-7,
Atlanta, Georgia 30329, ATTN: RIN 0920-AA71.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and RIN for this rulemaking. All relevant comments received will be
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket Access: For access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, or to download an electronic version of
the advance notice of proposed rulemaking, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Comments will be available for public inspection
Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays, from 9 a.m. until 5
p.m. at 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30329. Please call ahead to
1-866-694-4867 and ask for a representative in the Division of Select
Agents and Toxins (DSAT) to schedule your visit. Please be aware that
comments and other submissions from members of the public are made
available for public viewing without changes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel S. Edwin Ph.D., Director,
Division of Select Agents and Toxins, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H21-7, Atlanta, Georgia
30329. Telephone: (404) 718-2000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble to this advance notice of
proposed rulemaking is organized as follows:
I. Public Participation
II. Background
III. Modifications to the List of Select Agents and Toxins Being
Considered
A. Agents and Toxins Under Consideration
i. Botulinum Neurotoxin Producing Species of Clostridium
ii. Coxiella burnetii
iii. Rickettsia prowazekii
iv. Bacillus anthracis (Pasteur Strain)
v. Brucella Abortus, Brucella Melitensis, and Brucella Suis
vi. Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV) 1AB and 1C
vii. Short, Paralytic Alpha Conotoxins
viii. Diacetoxyscirpenol
ix. Staphylococcal Enterotoxins
x. New World Hantaviruses:
1. Sin Nombre Virus
2. Andes Virus
xi. Old World Hantaviruses:
1. Hantaan Virus
2. Dobrava Virus
B. Toxins Being Considered for Revision to Exclusion Amounts
(i.e., the Amount Below Which the Toxin Is Not Subject to Regulatory
Oversight)
i. Saxitoxin
ii. Tetrodotoxin
iii. Botulinum neurotoxin
C. Designating Nipah Virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent
IV. References
I. Public Participation
Interested persons or organizations are invited to participate by
submitting written views, recommendations, and data. Comments are
welcomed on any topic related to this advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
In addition, HHS/CDC invites comments specifically as to whether
there are additional biological agents or toxins that should be added
or removed from the HHS list of select agents and toxins based on the
following criteria outlined under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B):
(1) ``The effect on human health of exposure to the agent or toxin''
(2) ``The degree of contagiousness of the agent or toxin and the
methods by which the agent or toxin is transferred to humans''
(3) ``The availability and effectiveness of pharmacotherapies to
treat or immunizations to prevent any illness resulting from
infection by the agent or exposure to the toxin''
(4) ``Any other criteria including the needs of children and other
vulnerable populations'' and any other criteria that the commenter
believes should be considered.
Comments received, including attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record and subject to public
disclosure. Commenters should not include any information in their
comments or supporting materials that they consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure. HHS/CDC will carefully consider
all comments submitted.
II. Background
Under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (Bioterrorism Response Act) (42 U.S.C.
262a(a)(1)), the HHS Secretary must establish by regulation a list of
biological agents and toxins that have the potential to pose a severe
threat to public health and safety. In determining whether to include a
biological agent or toxin on the list, the Bioterrorism Response Act
(42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B)) requires that the HHS Secretary consider the
following criteria: The effect on human health of exposure to an agent
or toxin; the degree of contagiousness of the agent and the methods by
which the agent or toxin is transferred to humans; the availability and
effectiveness of pharmacotherapies and immunizations to treat and
prevent illnesses resulting from an agent or toxin; and any other
criteria including the needs of children and other vulnerable
populations that the HHS Secretary deems relevant.
Under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(2), the HHS Secretary must review and
republish the list of HHS select agents and toxins at least biennially.
For this review, HHS/CDC evaluated as discussed below each agent and
toxin based on: The degree of pathogenicity (ability of an organism to
cause disease); dissemination efficacy; aerosol stability; matrix
stability; ease of production; ability to genetically manipulate or
alter; severity of illness; case fatality rate; long-term health
effects; rate of transmission; available treatment; status of host
immunity (e.g. whether an individual has already been
[[Page 15088]]
exposed to the agent and generated an immune response); vulnerability
of special populations; decontamination and restoration (the extent
remediation efforts are needed due to agent persistence in the
environment and population); and the burden or impact on the health
care system.
The results of the previous biennial review, discussed in a final
rule published in the Federal Register on January 19, 2017 (82 FR
6278), were that HHS/CDC would make no changes to the list of HHS
select agents and toxins at that time. Given that HHS/CDC is again
considering whether to remove select agents and toxins as proposed in a
previous notice of proposed rulemaking (81 FR 2805, January 19, 2016),
HHS/CDC will consider the 35 public comments received from that notice
as part of this biennial review. The current list of HHS select agents
and toxins can be found at 42 CFR 73.3 (HHS select agents and toxins)
and 42 CFR 73.4 (Overlap select agents and toxins), and is available at
https://www.selectagents.gov/SelectAgentsandToxinsList.html.
As noted above, the list of HHS select agents and toxins is divided
into two sections. The biological agents and toxins listed in 42 CFR
73.3 (HHS select agents and toxins) have the potential to pose a severe
threat to human health and safety and are regulated only by HHS. The
biological agents listed in Sec. 73.4 (overlap select agents and
toxins) have not only the potential to pose a severe threat to human
health and safety; but have been determined by the USDA, pursuant to
USDA's authority under the Agriculture Bioterrorism Protection Act of
2002 (7 U.S.C. 8401), to have the potential to pose a severe threat to
animals and animal products. Accordingly, these biological agents are
jointly regulated by HHS and USDA as ``overlap'' select agents. The
Bioterrorism Response Act defines the term ``overlap agent or toxin''
to mean a biological agent or toxin that is listed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. 262a and is listed pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 8401. See 7 U.S.C. 8411.
If HHS/CDC removes any overlap select agents from its list, these
agents might still be regulated as USDA select agents dependent on the
outcome of USDA biennial review.
III. Modifications to the List of Select Agents and Toxins Being
Considered
The purpose of this advance notice of proposed rulemaking is to
seek public comment on potential changes to the current list of HHS and
overlap select agents and toxins. Specifically, we are providing an
opportunity for interested persons to submit comments, including peer
reviewed research data, that will better inform us as to whether there
are: (1) Any biological agents or toxins that should be added to the
select agents and toxin list because they have the potential to pose a
severe threat to public health and safety; and (2) biological agents or
toxins currently on the list that should be removed because they would
no longer be considered to have the potential to pose a severe threat
to public health and safety.
In addition, HHS/CDC is seeking comment on the following specific
changes to the list of HHS and overlap select agents under
consideration:
A. Select Agents and Toxins Under Consideration
i. Botulinum Neurotoxin Producing Species of Clostridium
Botulism is a serious paralytic disease caused by a neurotoxin
produced during the growth of the spore-forming bacterium Clostridium
botulinum (or rarely, C. argentinense (Puig de Centorbi et al., 1997),
C. butyricum, or C. baratii) (Sobel, 2005). As such, the organism
itself does not normally cause disease. HHS/CDC is seeking any
information that will help inform our deliberations regarding if
Clostridium botulinum should be treated consistently with the
regulation of other select toxins in which a toxin is regulated but not
the organism that produces the toxin. For example, Staphylococcus
aureus is not listed as a select agent, yet Staphylococcal enterotoxins
A,B,C,D,E subtypes are regulated toxins.
Should Botulinum neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium be
removed or retained as an HHS select agent? Please provide a detailed
explanation for your response.
ii. Coxiella burnetii
Q fever is a disease caused by the bacteria Coxiella burnetii. Q
fever is an acute febrile disease that varies in severity and duration.
Based on the criteria for listing select agents specified under 42
U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC is seeking comments from the public to
provide any information not included below to help inform our
deliberations regarding C. burnetii:
Q fever has a low mortality rate (<=2%) with antibiotic
treatment (Rolain et al., 2005). C. burnetii is susceptible to a number
of readily available antibiotics including tetracycline or doxycycline
(Rolain et al., 2005).
Only 0.2-0.5% of the Q fever cases progress past the acute
infection stage (Cutler, 2007).
A whole-cell killed vaccine (Q-Vax) is licensed in
Australia and has been used to vaccinate U.S. researchers who were at
risk (Seqiris Pty Ltd PV, 2014).
Should C. burnetii be removed or retained as an HHS select agent?
Please provide a detailed explanation for your response.
iii. Rickettsia prowazekii
Rickettsia prowazekii causes epidemic typhus, which is a louse-
borne disease. In 2012, HHS/CDC decided to retain R. prowazekii based
in part in anticipation of studies being conducted that would help HHS/
CDC to better understand the potential risk of an intentional release
of this organism. As of 2019, these studies had not been conducted.
Based on the criteria for listing select agents specified under 42
U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC is seeking comments from the public to
provide any information not included below to help inform our
deliberations regarding R. prowazekii:
Transmissibility from person-to-person is low because R.
prowazekii is usually transmitted via blood, although it can be spread
through inhalation of louse feces (ID50), the concentration
for human inhalation routes is unknown, but is estimated to be 10\3\-
10\6\ organisms based on non-human primate and other animal studies
(Eremeeva et al., 2005, Pike, 1976 and Walker, 2003, Reynolds et al.,
2003 and International Cooperation in Animal Biologics, 2004).
This agent is difficult to grow and purify in quantities
that would make it a viable biological weapon (Woodman et al., 1977).
R. prowazekii is susceptible to readily available
antibiotics and can be treated with a single dose of doxycycline when
symptoms are present (Raoult et al., 1991).
When grown in a laboratory, it is difficult to maintain
the stability of the organism and therefore it would be difficult to
disseminate efficiently to cause mass exposure or disease that would
have a significant public health impact (Bovarnick et al., 1950).
Should R. prowazekii be removed or retained as an HHS select agent?
Please provide a detailed explanation for your response.
iv. Bacillus anthracis (Pasteur Strain)
Bacillus anthracis is the bacteria that causes anthrax, an acute
disease in animals and humans. In order to cause the disease anthrax,
B. anthracis requires two plasmids, pX01 and pX02, which carry toxin
and capsule genes (Luna et al., 2006). B. anthracis (Pasteur strain)
lacks the pX01 plasmid that is needed to cause the disease (Ivins et
al., 1986). HHS/CDC excluded the B. anthracis (Sterne strain) in 2003
because the strain lacks the pX02
[[Page 15089]]
plasmid that encodes for the capsule. However, HHS/CDC has retained B.
anthracis (Pasteur strain) to date because of a concern that someone
working in a laboratory could combine the Pasteur strain with the
Sterne strain to produce the wild type phenotype B. anthracis de novo,
a select agent. Based on the criteria for listing select agents
specified under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC is seeking comments
from the public to provide any information to help inform our
deliberations regarding if B. anthracis (Pasteur strain) should be
removed or retained as an HHS select agent? Please provide a detailed
explanation for your response.
v. Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
Based on the criteria for listing select agents specified under 42
U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC is seeking comments from the public to
provide any information not included below to help inform our
deliberations regarding B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis:
Brucella infections have a low case fatality rate, with an
untreated fatality rate usually ranging from 1-2% of those identified
with the infection (Spickler, 2018).
Disease caused by these bacteria is treatable with
antibiotics (Spickler, 2018).
There is no indication that Brucella is transmitted
between people by casual contact under ordinary condition. Humans are
typically infected from exposure to animal reservoirs or animal
products; transmission to humans from wildlife is a rare event unless
an individual directly handles infected animals, such as in butchering
meat (Godfroid et al., 2013).
Brucellosis causes mild clinical symptoms (flu-like
illness); incubation periods typically range from 1 to 4 weeks, but can
extend to 6 months (Olsen et al., 2018).
Should B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis be removed or
retained as an HHS select agent? Please provide a detailed explanation
for your response.
vi. Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV) 1AB and 1C
VEEV usually causes mild to severe influenza-like symptoms. Based
on the criteria for listing select agents specified under 42 U.S.C.
262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC is seeking comments from the public to provide
any information not included below to help inform our deliberations
regarding VEEV 1AB and 1C:
Case fatality rate is less than 0.7%. Serosurvey data from
the 1995 Venezuelan 1C outbreak indicated that, of 75,000 estimated
human cases, one-third reported to a clinic or hospital, and 3,000 (4%)
were hospitalized for neuroinvasive disease (sequelae), demonstrating
that two-thirds of the cases [in the 1995 outbreak] were mild or
asymptomatic (Rivas et al., 1997).
While it is theoretically possible for VEEV to be spread
between humans since the virus is found in the pharynx of 6 to 40% of
acutely ill patients, there is no documented evidence of human-to-human
transmission (Smith et al., 2009).
An effective equine vaccine is available and a range of
humanized monoclonal antibodies are currently available for emergency
use (Weaver et al., 1996). Restricted animal movement, insecticide
application, and equine vaccinations are a part of effective control
measures to contain VEE outbreaks and mitigate the spread of disease
from equine to humans.
Should VEEV 1AB and 1C be removed or retained as an HHS select
agent? Please provide a detailed explanation for your response.
vii. Short, Paralytic Alpha Conotoxins
Predatory cone snails (genus Conus) produce a rich array of venoms
(conotoxins) that collectively contain an estimated 100,000 small,
disulfide-rich peptides neurotoxins (Bulaj, 2008). Short, paralytic
alpha conotoxins containing the following amino acid sequence
X1CCX2PACGX3X4X5X
6CX7 are a group of neurotoxic peptides isolated
from the venom of the marine cone snail, genus Conus. Based on the
criteria for listing select agents specified under 42 U.S.C.
262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC is seeking comments from the public to provide
any information not included below to help inform our deliberations
regarding short, paralytic alpha conotoxins:
Production of pure preparations (chemical synthesis of
larger quantities of appropriately folded peptides) is a challenge due
to the thermodynamic instability of many conotoxins (Purcell et al.,
2012) and most alpha-conotoxins harvested from the venom bulbs of cone
snails are inactive precursors that are not in the functional form of
the select toxin. To generate the functional form, soluble peptides of
the appropriate amino acid sequence must be treated with proteases to
properly fold and activate the toxin, which requires higher-level
technical expertise and is a slow process involving several months (Wu
et al., 2013).
The optimal route of exposure for toxicity for conotoxins
is through injection. However, even though there is currently no
published literature to support conotoxins being administered via the
inhalation route to achieve a toxic effect, the LD50 (dose
required to kill half the members of a tested population after a
specified test duration) is estimated at 20 [mu]g/kg by inhalation
(Thapa et al., 2014).
Should conotoxins (short, paralytic alpha conotoxins containing the
following amino acid sequence
X1CCX2PACGX3X4X5X
6CX7) be removed or retained as a select toxin?
If retained, should the exclusion amount for conotoxins be increased or
decreased? Please provide a detailed explanation for your response.
viii. Diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS)
DAS, a derivative of tetracyclic sesquiterpenes called
trichothecenes, is produced from strains of Fusarium sambucinum and
related species that grow on barley, corn, oats, rye, or wheat. In
2005, HHS/CDC retained DAS because of limited understanding of the risk
at the time of whether DAS has the potential to pose a severe threat to
public health. The estimated LD50 of DAS for rodents is 2 to
16 mg/kg (Knutsen, H.K., et al., 2018).
Based on the criteria for listing select agents specified under 42
U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC is seeking comments from the public to
provide any information to help inform our deliberations regarding DAS.
Should DAS be removed or retained as a select toxin? If retained,
should the DAS exclusion amount be increased or decreased? Please
provide a detailed explanation for your response.
ix. Staphylococcal Enterotoxins
Staphylococcus aureus produces a number of exotoxins, one of which
is Staphylococcal enterotoxin B, or SEB. SEB normally exerts its effect
on the intestines and therefore is referred to as an enterotoxin. SEB
is one of the pyrogenic toxins (causing fever) that commonly causes
food poisoning in humans after the toxin is produced in improperly
handled foodstuffs and subsequently ingested. Based on the criteria for
listing select agents specified under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC
is seeking comments from the public to provide any information not
included below to help inform our deliberations regarding
Staphylococcal enterotoxins:
The estimated annual number of domestically acquired
foodborne hospitalization (6% hospitalization rate) and deaths (<0.1%
death rate) caused by S. aureus is low. (Scallan et al., 2011).
The ED50 (concentration of a drug that produces
a biological response) for Staphylococcal enterotoxins:
[cir] Intravenously: ED50 0.03 [mu]g/kg (rhesus monkeys)
(Bergdoll, 1979)
[[Page 15090]]
[cir] Ingestion: ED50 1 [mu]g/kg (rhesus monkeys)
(Bergdoll, 1979)
[cir] Intragastrically: ED50 1.7 [mu]g/kg (5 ug/monkey
for 3 kg rhesus monkeys) (Donnelly et al., 1967)
Should Staphylococcal enterotoxins be removed or retained as a
select toxin? If retained, should the Staphylococcal enterotoxins
exclusion amount be increased or decreased? Please provide a detailed
explanation for your response.
B. Biological Agents Under Consideration for Being Added to the HHS
Select Agent and Toxin List
i. New World Hantaviruses
Some New World Hantaviruses can cause Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome
(HPS) in humans. HPS is an acute febrile illness with a symptoms
consisting of fever, chills, myalgia, headache, and gastrointestinal
symptoms (Hooper et al., 2013). Based on the results of the ISATTAC
evaluation of New World Hantaviruses, HHS/CDC is considering the
addition of Sin Nombre virus (SNV) and Andes virus to the list of
select agents because:
The average case fatality rate in the United States from
1993 to 2016 is 36% (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017).
Andes virus is capable of person-to-person transmission
(Martinez et al., 2005 and Vitek et al., 1996).
The infectious and lethal doses are very low. For Andes
virus in hamsters, the infectious dose is estimated to be between 1-10
virus particles, and the lethal dose is estimated to be between 10-100
virus particles (Hooper et al., 2001 and Hooper et al., 2008).
There are no FDA-approved vaccines or drugs to prevent or
treat infection with Andes or SNV. Supportive care is the only current
method of treatment for patients with HPS (Avsic-Zupanc et al., 2019).
Should Sin Nombre virus and Andes virus be added to the select
agent list? Should other New World Hantaviruses be regulated as HHS
select agents? In addition, HHS/CDC is seeking comments regarding the
potential burden and time needed for an entity possessing SNV or Andes
virus to come into compliance with the select agents and toxins
regulatory requirements. Please provide a detailed explanation for your
response.
ii. Old World Hantaviruses
Some highly pathogenic Old World Hantaviruses can cause severe
Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome (HFRS). HFRS is a generalized
infection, and the severity of the disease as well as clinical patterns
can manifest as mild, moderate or severe disease, depending upon the
causative virus. HFRS caused by Hantaan and Dobrava viruses is more
severe, while HFRS caused by Seoul virus is more moderate and by
Puumala virus is mild (Jonsson et al., 2010). The clinical picture for
Dobrava virus is severe with more hemorrhagic complications, shock (21
to 28%), oliguric renal failure (30 to 47%), and abdominal and pleural
effusions (Maes et al., 2009). Due to the severity of disease with
Hantaan virus and Dobrava virus, HHS/CDC is considering the addition of
Hantaan virus and Dobrava virus to the list of select agents because:
HFRS caused by Hantaan and Dobrava viruses are more severe
than infection caused by other Old World Hantaviruses such as Seoul,
Puumala, Sangassou, and Saaremma viruses (Maes et al., 2009 and Avsic-
Zupanc et al., 2019).
For Hantaan viruses, inhalation infectious dose
(ID50), is very low and in rats was 0.3-0.7 plaque-forming
unit (Nuzum et al., 1988).
Should Hantaan virus and Dobrava virus be added to the select agent
list? Should other Old World Hantaviruses be regulated as select
agents? In addition, HHS/CDC is seeking comments regarding the
potential burden and time needed for an entity possessing the Hantaan
or Dobrava virus to come into compliance with the select agents and
toxins regulatory requirements. Please provide a detailed explanation
for your response.
C. Exclusion Limits Being Considered for the Following Toxins
Based on the criteria for listing select toxins specified under 42
U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B), HHS/CDC is seeking comments from the public to
provide any information that will help inform our deliberations
regarding this biennial review including increasing or decreasing the
exclusion limit for the following toxins:
Saxitoxin based on the LD50 by ingestion is
estimated as 0.3-1.0 mg/person (Burrows et al., 1999) and estimated
mortality rate of 15% for Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (Rodrique, et
al., 1990 and Hallegraeff, et al. 1995)
Tetrodotoxin based on LD50 estimated 15-60
[mu]g/kg by ingestion (Burrows et al., 1999); 2 [mu]g/kg by inhalation;
8-14 [mu]g/kg by injection (mouse, dog, rabbit) (Bane et al., 2014) and
the recent puffer fish poisoning in 2008 Bangladesh involved 141 cases
with 17 deaths (Islam et al., 2011)
Botulinum neurotoxin estimated at 1 ug/kg by ingestion;
0.01-0.012 ug/kg by inhalation; 0.0013-0.0024 ug/kg by injection
(Guzman et al., 2001)
D. Designating Nipah Virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent
Executive Order 13546 ``Optimizing the Security of Biological
Select Agents and Toxins in the United States'' directed the HHS
Secretary to designate a subset of the select agents and toxins list
that present the greatest risk of deliberate misuse with the most
significant potential for mass casualties or devastating effects to the
economy, critical infrastructure, or public confidence. This subset of
select agents and toxins is identified as Tier 1. HHS/CDC is seeking
public comment on whether Nipah virus should be identified as a Tier 1
select agent. HHS/CDC is considering whether the Nipah virus should be
designated as a Tier 1 agent because the public health threat posed by
Nipah virus is similar to that of Marburg and Ebola viruses which are
both currently Tier 1, with characteristics such as:
Human transmissibility (person-to-person transmission has
occurred) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014; Gurley et
al., 2007; Luby et al., 2012; and Luby et al., 2009).
High case fatality rate (estimated between 40-100%) (World
Health Organization, 2017 and Harcourt et al., 2004).
Low infectious dose (ranging from 100-10\7\ plaque forming
units depending on route of infection) (DeWit et al., 2014; Geisbert et
al., 2010; and Mathieu et al., 2012).
High severity of illness (fever, headache, dizziness,
vomiting, cough, reduced levels of consciousness, respiratory distress,
and death) (Hoh et al., 2000; Hossain et al., 2008; and Lo et al.,
2008).
Severe long-term effects (neurological sequelae including
encephalopathy, cranial nerve palsies, and dystonia) (Sejvar et al.,
2007 and Lo et al., 2008). For entities that are currently registered
to possess Nipah virus, they are also in possession of other Tier 1
select agents. Therefore, designating Nipah virus as Tier 1 select
agent would not require an entity to meet additional requirements
associated with Tier 1 agents. Should Nipah virus be identified as a
Tier 1 select agent? Please provide a detailed explanation for your
response.
V. References
Arnon, S.S., et al., Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: Medical
and public health management. JAMA, 2001. 285(8): p. 1059-70.
[[Page 15091]]
Avsic-Zupanc T., et al. M. Hantavirus Infections, Clin Micro and
Infect. 2019. p. e1-11.
Bane, V., et al., Tetrodotoxin: chemistry, toxicity, source,
distribution and detection. Toxins, 2014. 6(2): p. 693-755.
Bergdoll, M.S. Staphylococcal intoxications. in Foodborne infections
and intoxications, 2nd Edition, H. Riemann and F.L. Bryan, Ed. 1979,
Academic Press.
Bovarnick, M., et al. The Influence of Certain Salts, Amino Acids,
Augars, and Proteins on the Stability of Rickettsiae. J Bacteriol.
1950. 59(4): p. 509-22.
Bulaj G., et al. Folding of Conotoxins: Formation of the Native
Disulfide Bridges During Chemical Synthesis and Biosynthesis of
Conus Peptides. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2008. 10(1):p. 141-55.
Burrows, W.D., et al. Biological warfare agents as threats to
potable water. Environ Health Perspect, 1999. 107(12): p. 975-84.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017. Annual U.S.
Hantavirus Disease and HPS Case Fatality, 1993-2016. Retrieved from
https://www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/surveillance/annual-cases.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. Nipah Virus.
Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/nipah/.
Cutler, S. Q Fever. J Infect, 2007. 54(4): p. 313-8.
De Wit, E., et al. Foodborne transmission of Nipah virus in Syrian
Hamsters. PLoS Pathog, 2014. 10(3): p. e1004001.
Donnelly, C.B., et al. Serological identification of enterotoxigenic
staphylococci from cheese. Appl Microbiol, 1967. 15(6): p. 1382-7.
Eremeeva, M.E. et al. Typhus, Epidemic (Rickettsia prowazekii) and
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (Rickettsia rickettsii). Encyclopedia
of Bioterrorism Defense, 2005. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Geisbert, T., et al. Development of an Acute and Highly Pathogenic
Nonhuman Primate Model of Nipah Virus Infection. PLoS ONE, 2010.
5(5): p. e10690.
Godfroid, J., et al. Brucellosis in Terrestrial Wildlife. Rev sci
tech Off int Epiz, 2013. 32(1), p. 27-42.
Goh, K., et al. Clinical Features of Nipah virus Encephalitis Among
Pig Farmers in Malaysia. N Engl J Med, 2000. 342(17): p. 1229-35.
Gurley, E., et al. Person-to-Person Transmission of Nipah virus in a
Bangladeshi Community. Emerg Infect Dis, 2007. 13(7): p. 1031-7.
Guzman, K.D., et al., Biological Terrorism Modeling Parameters.
2014, Sandia National Laboratories.
Hallegraeff, G., et al. Manual on harmful marine microalgae, IOC
Manuals and Guides No. 33. 1995.
Harcourt, B., et al. Genetic Characterization of Nipah virus,
Bangladesh, 2004. Emerg Infect Dis, 2005. 11(10): p. 1594-1597.
Hooper, J., et al. A Lethal Disease Model for Hantavirus Pulmonary
Syndrome. Virology, 2001. 289(1): p. 6-14.
Hooper, J., et al. A Novel Sin Nombre virus DNA Vaccine and its
Inclusion in a Candidate Pan-Hantavirus Vaccine Against Hantavirus
Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS) and Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome
(HFRS). Vaccine, 2013. 31(40): p. 4314-21.
Hooper, J. et al. Immune Serum Produced by DNA Vaccination Protects
Hamsters Against Lethal Respiratory Challenge with Andes virus.
Journal of Virology, 2008. 82(3): p. 1332-1338.
Hossain, M., et al. Clinical Presentation of Nipah virus Infection
in Bangladesh. Clin Infect Dis, 2008. 46(7): p. 977-84.
Hussein, I., et al. Recent Advances in Hantavirus Molecular Biology
and Disease. Adv Appl Microbiol, 2011. 74: p. 35-75.
Institute for International Cooperation in Animal Biologics. 2004.
Typhus Fever-Rickettsia prowazekii. Retrieved from http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/typhus_fever.pdf.
Islam, Q.T., et al., Puffer fish poisoning in Bangladesh: clinical
and toxicological results from large outbreaks in 2008. Trans R Soc
Trop Med Hyg, 2011. 105(2): p. 74-80.
Ivins, B., et at. Immunization Studies with Attenuated Strains of
Bacillus anthracis. Infect Immun, 1986. 52(2): p. 454-458.
Jonsson, C., et al. A Global Perspective on Hantavirus Ecology,
Epidemiology, and Disease. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2010. 23(2):p. 412-
41.
Knutsen, H.K., et al. Risk to human and animal health related to the
presence of 4,15-diacetoxyscirpenol in food and feed. EFSA Jour,
2018. 16(8): p. 1-106.
Lo, M., et al. The Emergence of Nipah virus, a Highly Pathogenic
Paramyxovirus. J Clin Virol, 2008. 43(4): p. 396-400.
Luby, S., et al. Epidemiology of Henipavirus disease in Humans. Curr
Top Microbiol Immunol, 2012. 359: p. 25-40.
Luby, S., et al. Recurrent Zoonotic Transmission of Nipah virus into
Humans, Bangladesh, 2001-2007. Emerg Infect Dis, 2009. 15(8): p.
1229-35.
Luna, V., et al. Bacillus anthracis Virulent Plasmid pX02 Genes
Found in Large Plasmids of Two Other Bacillus species. J of Clinical
Microbiol, 2006. 44(7): P. 2367-77.
Maes P., et al. Recent Approaches in Hantavirus Vaccine Development.
Expert Rev Vaccines, 2009. 8(1): p. 67-76.
Martinez, V., et al. Person-to-Person Transmission of Andes virus.
Emerg Infect Dis, 2005. 11(12): p. 1848-53.
Mathieu, C., et al. Nonstructural Nipah Virus C Protein Regulates
both the Early Host Proinflammatory Response and Viral Virulence.
Journal of Virology, 2012. 86(19): p. 10766-10775.
Maurin M., et al. Q Fever. Clin Microbiol Rev, 1999. 12(4): p. 518-
53.
Nuzum, E., et al. Aerosol Transmission of Hantaan and Related
Viruses to Laboratory Rats. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1988. 38(3): p. 636-
40.
Olsen, S., et al. Biosafety Concerns Related to Brucella and its
Potential Use as a Bioweapon. Applied Biosafety, 2018. 23(2): p. 77-
90.
Parker, N., et al. Q Fever. Lancet, 2006. 367(9511): p. 679-688.
Pike, R. Laboratory-Associated Infections: Summary and Analysis of
3921 Cases. Health Lab Sci, 1976. 13(2): p. 105-14.
Puig de Centorbi, O., et al. Selection of a Strain of Clostridium
argentinense Producing High Titers of Type G Botulinal Toxin.
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1997. 286(3): p. 413-9.
Purcell, A., et al. Unravelling Conotoxin Folding and Molecular
Diversity. Australian Biochemist, 2012. 43(2): p. 4-6.
Raoult, D., et al. Antimicrobial Therapy of Rickettsial Diseases.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1991. 35(12): p. 2457-62.
Raoult, D., et al. Outbreak of Epidemic Typhus Associated with
Trench Fever in Burundi. Lancet, 1998. 352(9125): p. 353-8.
Reynolds, M.G., et al., Flying Squirrel-Associated Typhus, United
States. Emerg Infect Dis, 2003. 9(10): p. 1341-3.
Rivas, F., et al. Epidemic Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis in La
Guajira, Colombia. J Infect Dis, 1997. 175(4): p. 828-32.
Rodrigue, D.C., et al. Lethal paralytic shellfish poisoning in
Guatemala. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1990. 42(3): p. 267-71.
Rolain, J., et al. Correlation Between Ratio of Serum Doxycycline
Concentration to MIC and Rapid Decline of Antibody Levels during
Treatment of Q Fever Endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,
2005. 49: p. 2673-76.
Scallan, E., et al. Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United
States--Major Pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis, 2011. 17(1): p. 7-15.
Seqiris Pty Ltd PV. Q-VAX, Q Fever Vaccine, Consumer Medical
Information; 2014.
Sejvar J., et al. Long-term Neurological and Functional Outcome in
Nipah virus Infection. Ann Neurol. 2007 Sep;62(3): p. 235-42.
Sobel, J., Botulism. Clin Infect Dis, 2005. 41(8): p. 1167-73.
Smith, D. et al. Alphaviruses. Clinical Virology, 3rd ed., ASM
Press, 2009. pp. 1241-1274.
Smith, L., The Occurrence of Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium
tetani in the Soil of the United States. Health Lab Sci, 1978.
15(2): p. 74-80.
Spickler, A. 2018. Brucellosis. Retrieved from http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/DiseaseInfo/factsheets.php.
Thapa, M.J. et al. Conotoxins and their regulatory considerations.
Reg and Tox and Pharm, 2014. 70: p. 197-202.
Vitek, C. et al. Evidence against Person-to-Person Transmission of
Hantavirus to Health Care Workers. Clin Infect Dis, 1996. 22: p.
824-6.
Walker, D. Principles of the Malicious Use of Infectious Agents to
Create Terror--Reasons for Concern for Organisms of the Genus
Rickettsia. Rickettsiology: Present and Future Directions, 2003.
990: p. 739-742.
Weaver, S., et al. Re-emergence of Epidemic Venezuelan Equine
Encephalomyelitis in South America. Lancet, 1996. 348(9025): p. 436-
40.
Woodman, D., et al. Biological Properties of Rickettsia prowazekii
Strains Isolated from Flying Squirrels. Infect Immun, 1977. 16(3):
p. 853-60.
[[Page 15092]]
World Health Organization, Nipah Virus Outbreaks in the WHO South-
East Asia Region. 2017. Retrieved from www.searo.who.int/entity/emerging_diseases/links/nipah_virus_outbreaks_sear/en/.
Wu, X., et al. Optimal Cleavage and Oxidative Folding of Alpha-
Conotoxin TxIB as a Therapeutic Candidate Peptide. Mar Drugs, 2013.
11(9): p. 3537-53.
Dated: February 21, 2020.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-05477 Filed 3-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P