REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste
7.2.2017 - (COM(2015)0596 – C8-0385/2015 – 2015/0276(COD)) - ***I
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Rapporteur: Simona Bonafè
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste
(COM(2015)0596 – C8-0385/2015 – 2015/0276(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2015)0596),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8-0385/2015),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the French Senate, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 27 April 2016[1],
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 15 June 2016[2],
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A8-0029/2017),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital -1 (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(-1) In view of the Union's dependence on the import of raw materials and the rapid depletion of a significant amount of natural resources over the short term, it is a key challenge to reclaim as many resources as possible within the Union and to enhance the transition towards a circular economy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is important to highlight the wider framework of moving towards a circular economy and stress the opportunity the revision of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive offers in enhancing this transition. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital -1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(-1a) Waste management should be transformed into sustainable material management. The revision of Directive 94/62/EC of European Parliament and Council 1a offers an opportunity to that end. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Directive 94/62/EC of European Parliament and Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste (OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is important to highlight the wider framework of moving towards a circular economy and to stress the opportunity the revision of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive offers in enhancing this transition. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Waste management in the Union should be improved, with a view to protecting, preserving and improving the quality of the environment, protecting human health, ensuring prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources and promoting a more circular economy. |
(1) Waste management in the Union should be improved, with a view to protecting, preserving and improving the quality of the environment, protecting human health, ensuring prudent and efficient utilisation of natural resources, promoting the principles of the circular economy, enhancing the diffusion renewable energy, increasing energy efficiency, reducing the dependence of the Union on imported resources providing new economic opportunities and long-term competitiveness. In order to make the economy truly circular, it is necessary to take additional measures on sustainable production and consumption, focusing on the whole life cycle of products in a way that preserves resources and closes the loop. Using resources more efficiently would also bring substantial net savings for Union businesses, public authorities and consumers while reducing total annual greenhouse gas emissions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1a) A political and societal incentive to promote recovery and recycling as a sustainable way to handle natural resources within circular economy should respect the waste management hierarchy laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a and to strictly apply the approach by which prevention takes priority over recycling. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A circular economy cannot work without clean production. Toxic substances should be avoided at the design stage to allow products and materials to circulate in a closed loop without endangering the quality of materials and the health of citizens, workers and the environment. This requires changing the approach to toxic substances so that in a circular economy, hazardous substances will not hinder the processes of reuse, repair and recycling. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 b(new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1b) Littering and improper disposal of packaging and packaging waste has negative impacts on both the marine environment and the Union economy and poses unnecessary risks to public health. Many of the most commonly found items on beaches include packaging waste, with long-term impacts on the environment which affect tourism and public enjoyment of these natural areas. Additionally, packaging waste that makes its way into the marine environment subverts the priority order of the waste hierarchy, in particular by avoiding preparation for reuse, recycling and other recovery prior to its improper disposal. In order to reduce the disproportionate contribution of packaging waste to marine litter, a binding target should be established, supported by targeted measures adopted by Member States. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) The targets laid down in Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council13 for the recovery and recycling of packaging and packaging waste should be amended by increasing the preparing for re-use and recycling of packaging waste in order to better reflect the Union’s ambition to move towards a circular economy. |
(2) The targets laid down in Directive 94/62/EC for the recovery and recycling of packaging and packaging waste should be amended by increasing the recycling of packaging waste in order to better reflect the Union’s ambition to move towards a circular economy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Directive 94/62/EC of European Parliament and Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste (OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2a) Separate quantitative targets for re-use, that Member States should aim to achieve, should be established to promote re-usable packaging while contributing to the job creation and to savings in resources. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2b) Increasing the reuse of packaging can reduce the overall cost in the supply chain and reduce the environmental impact of packaging waste. Member States should support the introduction on the market of re-usable packaging which is recyclable at the end of its life. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2c) In certain situations, such as food service, single use packaging is required to guarantee food hygiene and the health and safety of consumers. Member States should take account of this when developing prevention measures and should promote greater access to recycling for such packaging. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prevention measures must take account of the need to prioritise food hygiene and consumer health and safety. There are certain situations where food hygiene and consumer safety do not permit the use of re-usable forms of packaging, such as for takeaway meals, for example. On the other hand, Member States need to make more effort needs to support out-of-home collection of such packaging and its recycling. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) Furthermore, in order to ensure greater coherence in waste legislation, the definitions in Directive 94/62/EC should be aligned to those of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council14 applicable to waste in general. |
(3) Furthermore, in order to ensure greater coherence in waste legislation, without prejudice to the specificity of packaging and packaging waste, the definitions in Directive 94/62/EC should be aligned, where relevant, to those of Directive 2008/98/EC applicable to waste in general. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ensuring consistency across all EU waste legislation is essential. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) Clear environmental, economic and social benefits would be derived from further increasing the targets laid down in Directive 94/62/EC for preparation for re-use and recycling of packaging waste. |
(4) Clear environmental, economic and social benefits would be derived from further increasing the targets laid down in Directive 94/62/EC for recycling of packaging waste. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4a) Waste prevention is the most efficient way to improve resource efficiency, reduce the environmental impact of waste and promote recycling materials of high quality. For those reasons, Member States should adopt a life-cycle approach in order to reduce the environmental impact of products. Member States should take measures to incentivise the take-up of re-usable packaging and to achieve a reduction in consumption of packaging that is not recyclable and of excessive packaging To that end, Member States should make use of adequate economic instruments and other measures to provide incentives for the application of the waste hierarchy. Member States should be able to use those listed in Annex IVa to Directive 2008/98/EC. Furthermore, waste prevention efforts should not compromise the role of packaging in preserving hygiene or safety for consumers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4b) Member States should put in place adequate incentives for the application of the waste hierarchy, in particular, by means of financial and fiscal incentives aimed at achieving the packaging waste prevention and recycling objectives of this Directive, such as landfill and incineration charges, pay-as-you-throw schemes, extended producer responsibility schemes and incentives for local authorities. Those measures should be part of the packaging waste prevention programmes in all Member States. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Member States have a fundamental part to play in ensuring the transition to the circular economy, and it is important that they should create adequate financial, tax and regulatory incentives for packing waste prevention and recycling, in line with the objectives of this Directive. The measures taken should form part of specific programmes for packaging waste management and prevention in all Member States. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4c) In the vast majority of cases, the provision of packaging does not depend on and is not chosen by the final consumer but rather by the producer. Extended producer responsibility schemes are a suitable means of both preventing the formation of packaging waste and creating systems that will guarantee the return and/or collection of used packaging and/or packaging waste from the consumer, other final user, or from the waste stream, and the reuse or recovery, including recycling of the packaging and/or packaging waste, that is collected. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 d (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4d) In order to boost the prevention of packaging waste and reduce its impact on the environment while promoting recycling materials of high quality, the essential requirements of and Annex II to this Directive should be reviewed, and if necessary revised, to strengthen the requirements that will enhance the design for re-use and high quality recycling of packaging. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 e (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4e) Member States’ national strategies should include the raising of public awareness , in the form of the various incentives and benefits deriving from products made from recycled waste, which will encourage investment in the recycled products sector. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 f (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4 f) Fostering a sustainable bio-economy can contribute to decreasing Europe's dependence on imported raw materials. Improving market conditions for bio-based recyclable packaging and compostable biodegradable packaging and reviewing existing law hampering the use of those materials offers the opportunity to stimulate further research and innovation and to substitute fossil fuel-based feedstocks with renewable sources for the production of packaging, where beneficial from a lifecycle perspective, and support further organic recycling. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) Through a progressive increase of the existing targets on preparing for re-use and recycling of packaging waste, it should be ensured that economically valuable waste materials are progressively and effectively recovered through proper waste management and in line with the waste hierarchy. That way it should be ensured that valuable materials found in waste are returned into the European economy, thus making progress in the implementation of the Raw Materials Initiative15 and the creation of a circular economy. |
(5) Through a progressive increase of the existing targets on recycling of packaging waste, it should be ensured that economically valuable waste materials are progressively and effectively recovered through proper waste management and in line with the waste hierarchy. That way it should be ensured that valuable materials found in waste are returned into the European economy, thus making progress in the implementation of the Raw Materials Initiative15 and the creation of a circular economy without prejudice to food safety, consumer health and food contact materials law. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 COM(2013) 442. |
15 COM(2013) 442. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5a) A clean, effective and sustainable circular economy requires the removal of hazardous substances from products at the design stage and, in this context, a circular economy should recognise explicit provisions in the Seventh Environment Action Programme which call for the development of non-toxic material cycles so that recycled waste can be used as a major and reliable source of raw material for the Union. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The EU should focus on creating a clean circular economy and avoid possible major risk of a future loss in public and market confidence in recycled material while creating an endless legacy. The main burden for recyclers is the presence of hazardous substances in material. The focus of the EU should be on getting these hazardous substances out of products and waste, and not endangering public health and the environment by exempting certain classes of businesses or products from safe requirements and by making it impossible to identify those contaminated materials in the future. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5b) Once recycled material re-enters the economy due to it receiving end-of- waste status, either by complying with specific end of waste criteria or being incorporated in a new product, it is required to be fully compliant with Union chemicals law. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REACH does not apply to waste, as stated in Article 2(2) “Waste as defined in Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council is not a substance, mixture or article within the meaning of Article 3 of this Regulation”. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5c) There are substantial differences between household packaging waste and commercial and industrial packaging waste. In order to obtain a clear and accurate insight into both streams, Member States should report on them separately. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium is currently the only Member State which has a separate collection and reporting system for household packaging waste and commercial and industrial packaging waste. We believe this is a best practice example which has the potential to be replicated at the EU level. The economic reality for household packaging versus commercial and industrial packaging significantly differs: 1) they deal with different products and hence require different packaging, which lead to different waste streams; 2) the commercial dimension is different (B-to-B setting for commercial and industrial packaging versus B-to-C setting for household packaging; 3) the volumes of both streams highly differ. These are the three most compelling reasons for making a clear distinction between both streams. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) Many Member States have not yet completely developed the necessary waste management infrastructure. It is therefore essential to set clear policy objectives in order to avoid locking recyclable materials at the bottom of the waste hierarchy. |
(6) Many Member States have not yet completely developed the necessary waste management infrastructure for recycling. It is therefore essential to set clear policy objectives for the construction of waste treatment facilities and installations needed for prevention, reuse and recycling, in order to avoid locking recyclable materials at the bottom of the waste hierarchy and to set incentives for investments into an innovative waste management infrastructure for recycling. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6a) In order to help achieve the targets of this Directive and to boost the transition to a circular economy, the Commission should promote the coordination and exchange of information and best practices among Member States and different sectors of the economy. That exchange could be facilitated through communication platforms that could help raise awareness of new industrial solutions and allow for a better overview of available capacities which would contribute to connecting the waste industry and other sectors and support industrial symbiosis. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) With the combination of recycling targets and landfill restrictions laid down in Directives 2008/98/EC and 1999/31/EC, the Union targets for energy recovery and the recycling targets for packaging waste laid down in Directive 94/62/EC are no longer necessary. |
(7) With the combination of recycling targets and landfill restrictions laid down in Directives 2008/98/EC and 1999/31/EC of the Council1a , the Union targets for energy recovery for packaging waste laid down in Directive 94/62/EC are no longer necessary. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (OJ L 182, 16.7.1999, p. 1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recycling targets remain a fundamental instrument for use in managing the transition to a circular economy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Recital 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) This Directive sets long-term objectives for the Union’s waste management and gives the economic operators and the Member States a clear direction for the necessary investments to attain the objectives of this Directive. In developing their national waste management strategies and planning investments in waste management infrastructure, Member States should make a sound use of the European Structural and Investment Funds in line with the waste hierarchy by promoting prevention, re-use and recycling. |
(8) This Directive sets long-term objectives for the Union’s waste management and gives the economic operators and the Member States a clear direction for the necessary investments to attain the objectives of this Directive. In developing their national waste management strategies and planning investments in waste management infrastructure and the circular economy, Member States should make a sound use of the European Structural and Investment Funds in line with the waste hierarchy and devise those strategies and investment plans so that they are geared primarily to promoting waste prevention and re-use, followed by recycling, in line with the waste hierarchy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(9a) The rules on the further raising of recycling targets from 2030 onwards should be reviewed in the light of the experience gained in applying this Directive. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) Separate recycling targets should be set for ferrous metals and aluminium in order to achieve significant economic and environmental benefits because more aluminium would be recycled leading to significant energy and carbon dioxide savings. The existing preparing for re-use and recycling target for metal packaging should therefore be split into separate targets for those two types of waste. |
(10) Separate recycling targets should be set for ferrous metals and aluminium in order to achieve significant economic and environmental benefits because more metals would be recycled leading to significant energy and carbon dioxide savings. The existing preparing for re-use and recycling target for metal packaging should therefore be split into separate targets for those two types of waste. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Separate targets not only help to improve the aluminium recycling rates, but also steel recycling rates, it is therefore appropriate to use the word ‘metals’ rather than ‘aluminium’. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Recital 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) Member States should, for the purposes of calculating whether the preparation for re-use and recycling targets are achieved, be able to take into account products and components that are prepared for re-use by recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes. To ensure harmonised conditions for those calculations, the Commission will adopt detailed rules on the determination of recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes and on the collection, verification and reporting of data. |
(11) In order to ensure a uniform calculation of data on recycling targets the Commission should adopt detailed rules on the determination of recycling operators and on the collection, traceability, verification and reporting of data. After the adoption of this harmonised methodology, Member States should be able, for the purposes of calculating whether the recycling targets are achieved, to take into account the recycling of metals that takes place in conjunction with incineration or co-incineration. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) In order to ensure the reliability of the data gathered on preparation for re-use it is essential to establish common rules for reporting. Similarly, it is important to lay down more precisely the rules according to which Member States should report what is effectively recycled and can be counted towards the attainment of the recycling targets. To that effect, as a general rule, the reporting on the attainment of the recycling targets must be based on the input to the final recycling process. In order to limit administrative burdens, Member States should be allowed, under strict conditions, to report recycling rates on the basis of the output of sorting facilities. Losses in weight of materials or substances due to physical and/or chemical transformation processes inherent to the final recycling process should not be deducted from the weight of the waste reported as recycled. |
(12) In order to ensure the reliability of the data gathered on recycling it is essential to establish common rules on the collection, traceability, verification and reporting of data. Similarly, it is important to lay down more precisely the rules according to which Member States should report what is effectively recycled and can be counted towards the attainment of the recycling targets. The calculation of the attainment of the targets should be based on one harmonised method that prevents reporting of discarded waste as recycled waste. To that end, the reporting on the attainment of the recycling targets must be based on the input to the final recycling process. Losses in weight of materials or substances due to physical and/or chemical transformation processes inherent to the final recycling process should not be deducted from the weight of the waste reported as recycled. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Recital 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) Statistical data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of statistics should be improved by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. |
(14) Data and information reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of data reported should be improved by introducing a common methodology for collection and processing of data based on reliable sources and by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(16) Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among Member States. Therefore, when preparing the reports on compliance with the targets set out in Directive 94/62/EC, Member States should be required to use the most recent methodology developed by the Commission and the national statistical offices of the Member States. |
(16) Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among Member States. Therefore, when preparing the reports on compliance with the targets set out in Directive 94/62/EC, Member States should be required to use a common methodology for data collection and processing developed by the Commission in cooperation with the national statistical offices of the Member States and the national, regional and local authorities responsible for waste management. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(16a) Member States should submit to the Commission on request and without delay any information necessary for the evaluation of the implementation of this Directive as a whole and its impact on the environment and human health. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Recital 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(17) In order to supplement or amend Directive 94/62/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Articles 6a(2), 6a(5), 11(3), 19(2) and 20. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and the Council. |
(17) In order to supplement Directive 94/62/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of rules on the calculation of the attainment of the recycling targets, certain exceptions concerning the maximum concentration levels of heavy metals in certain recycled materials, product loops and types of packaging, on the common methodology for data collection and processing and the format for reporting data concerning the attainment of the recycling targets and amendments to the list of illustrative examples on the definition of packaging and any technical difficulties encountered in applying this Directive. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a directive Recital 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(18) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 94/62/EC, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of Articles 12(3d) and 19. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council16. |
(18) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 94/62/EC, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of for adapting to scientific and technical progress, the identification system concerning the nature of the packaging materials used. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council16. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28/02/2011, p. 13). |
16 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28/02/2011, p. 13). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(21a) Member States should ensure that high levels of occupational health and safety requirements are put in place for all Union workers, in line with existing Union law, and in accordance with the specific risks faced by workers in some production, recycling and waste sectors. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point-1 (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 1 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the objectives, it is important to highlight the importance of this directive for the transition towards a circular economy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 3 – point 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c Directive 94/62/EC Article 3 – points 3 to 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The definition of 're-use' is reinstated. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 3 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 94/62/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 c (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 5 – title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 d (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 5 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 e (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 f (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 5 – paragraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 g (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 5 – paragraph 1 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph -1 (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Separate collection and sorting for all packaging needs to be mandated not just promoted. Packaging that is not separately collected and sorted is not recycled. Only by introducing a clear legal obligation to mandate separate collection and sorting for all packaging, will all recyclable packaging materials have guaranteed access to collection and recycling schemes. Requiring Member States to set up systems to collect and sort all packaging is also necessary to secure a constant supply of recyclable materials thus providing a predictable scenario for innovation and investment in existing and new collection and sorting technologies and infrastructure. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 52 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 53 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 54 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 55 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Member States should encourage the use of materials obtained from recycled packaging waste for the production of packaging and other products, by improving market conditions for such materials and reviewing existing legislation which hampers their use, as well as creating incentives to use secondary raw materials and promoting materials which, once recycled, do not damage human health. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 56 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraphs 5, 8 and 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 57 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 58 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 59 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6a – paragraph 1a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 60 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6a – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To ensure that paragraph 1(a) of this Directive is applied uniformly, the Commission should adopt delegated acts establishing minimum quality and operational requirements for the determination of final recycling operators. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 61 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6a – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 62 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6a – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In its resolution on 'Resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy', adopted on 9 July 2015, the European Parliament called for the calculation of targets for recycling to be performed using a single harmonised method in all Member States, based on a solid reporting method preventing the reporting of discarded waste (landfilled or incinerated) as recycled waste. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 63 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6a – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is important that Member States establish a packaging waste monitoring and traceability system to ensure that the rules laid down in Article 1(1) of this Directive are complied with, and that they should inform the Commission about the method chosen for the management of this system. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 64 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6a – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 65 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6b – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 66 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6b – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 67 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 68 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to increase recycling, more must be collected and governments need to ensure that everything that can be recycled is recycled, in particular for packaging. Requiring Member States to set up systems to collect all packaging and packaging wastes will secure feedstock, thus generating investment and driving innovation in collection and sorting infrastructure and, in turn, ‘creating the recycling pipeline’. To leverage existing collection infrastructure, composite material should be collected in existing collection systems. Requiring separate collection of packaging waste would align the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive with the Waste Framework Directive which proposes under Article 11 that Member States must set up separate collection for at least the following: paper, metal, plastic and glass. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 69 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 c (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 70 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 71 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3a – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is important that the data reported should be based on a common methodology and reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 3d. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 72 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 73 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3c a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The impact of the Directive should be regularly assessed to ensure that the essential elements of the Directive are fit for purpose. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 74 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 75 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 94/62/EC Article 21a – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 76 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 94/62/EC Article 21a – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 77 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 94/62/EC Article 21a – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 78 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Annex II | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 79 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) Annex IV is added to Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste as set out in the Annex to this Directive. |
deleted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products and components which have not become waste must not count towards the attainment of targets for recycling, as the operations concerned are waste recovery operations. The re-use of products and components constitutes processing which prevents the generation of waste, so in accordance with the waste hierarchy it should be regarded as a prevention measure. Paragraph 6a(1) already defines the method of calculation of the rate of recycling. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 80 Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph - 1 (new) Directive 94/62/EC Annex II – point 1 – indent 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 81 Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph -1 a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Annex II – point 1– indent 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 82 Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph -1 b (new) Directive 94/62/EC Annex II – point 3 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 83 Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph -1 c (new) Directive 94/62/EC Annex II – point 3 – point d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 84 Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following Annex IV is added: |
deleted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
'ANNEX IV |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Calculation method for preparing for re-use of products and components for the purpose of Article 6(1)(f) to (i) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to calculate the adjusted rate of recycling and preparation for re-use in accordance with Article 6(1)(f) to (i), Member States shall use the following formula: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"E=" "(A+R)*100" /"(P+R)" |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E: adjusted recycling and re-use rate in a given year; |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A: weight of packaging waste recycled or prepared for re-use in a given year; |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R: weight of products and components prepared for re-use in a given year; |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P: weight of packaging waste generated in a given year.' |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products and components which have not become waste must not be counted towards the attainment of targets for recycling, as the operations concerned are waste recovery operations. The re-use of products and components constitutes processing which prevents the generation of waste, so in accordance with the waste hierarchy it should be regarded as a prevention measure. Paragraph 6a(1) already defines the method of calculation of the rate of recycling. |
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Introduction
The current linear development model, which may be summarised as 'take, produce, consume and dispose of', is beginning to show signs of reaching its limits. Our planet is warming, and the resources used, on which we depend, are becoming increasingly scarce. Unless structural measures are taken, demand for raw materials by the world economy could increase by more than 50% in the next 15 years. In order to reverse this trend, we must adopt a circular development model which keeps materials and their value in circulation within the economic system for as long as possible, by optimising the integrated waste cycle in order to put resources to efficient use. Re-use, recycling and recovery are becoming the key words around which a new paradigm needs to be built to promote sustainability, innovation and competitiveness, so that waste will cease to be a problem and become a resource.
The package should therefore be considered in a far wider context than that of a mere review of waste legislation. The rapporteur aims to encourage the Commission in its aim of preserving the environment, making the European economy more competitive and promoting sustainable reindustrialisation. Increasing the value of resources means intervening in all phases of the product life cycle: from extraction of raw materials to product design and from distribution, through consumption, to the end of life of products.
A clear and stable legislative framework is the first step in promoting the transition.
Such a systemic change calls for ambitious policies, backed by legislation capable of sending the right signals to investors. If European legislation fails to incorporate clear definitions and binding targets, it could harm progress towards the circular economy.
Taking the waste hierarchy as a basis, the rapporteur has made it her purpose to amend the Commission proposal mainly with regard to waste prevention and channelling waste back into the production process. In order to reduce the quantity of waste, it is necessary to launch upstream the innovation of production processes and business models basic to the circular economy.
The transformation of the Union into a green, low-carbon economy which uses resources efficiently is already one of the main objectives of the Seventh European Environmental Action Programme, and it is worth recalling that Europe has committed itself to attaining the UN's sustainable development targets.
Directive on packaging and packaging waste
Eurostat estimates that in 2013 more than 79.368 million tonnes of packaging waste was generated in Europe, some 500 000 tonnes more than in 2012. The recycling rate was 65.3%, a slight increase on the figure for 2012, with only three Member States below 50%. In the next few years, it is anticipated that the quantities of packaging placed on the market will continue to increase.
Directive 94/62/EC has undergone a number of revisions. In 2010, as part of the Commission's Work Programme, the Directive was subjected to a specific fitness check, the results of which were published in the 2014 Staff Working Document[1] which accompanied the original legislative package on the circular economy, which the Commission withdrew in December 2014.[2]
Various recommendations in the Staff Working Document which are intended to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Directive have not been included in the new Commission proposal. Certain key elements in the Directive should therefore be improved, particularly in order to align them with the waste management hierarchy, which classifies prevention as the most important level.
The raising of recycling targets, the extension of compulsory EPR schemes to packaging, better wording and more stringent implementation of essential requirements and promotion of re-use are among the initiatives which the rapporteur has sought to bring forward in order to promote efficient use of resources.
Quantitative prevention and qualitative improvement of packaging should be the primary objective of a revision of the Directive in line with the principles on which the circular economy is based. To this end, it is necessary to remove incentives for the excessive use of packaging imposed on the consumer, promoting the design of packaging which can be recycled and/or re-used more easily. In addition, measures should be promoted to support research into and the use and marketing of packaging using renewable resources.
Lastly, the rapporteur has incorporated the same amendments as were inserted in the Waste Framework Directive as regards the definitions and the methodology for calculating quantities of waste subject to preparation for re-use and recycling.
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (20.10.2016)
for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste
(COM(2015)0596 – C8‑0385/2015 – 2015/0276(COD))
Rapporteur: João Ferreira
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
Taking into account the different starting positions in the Member States with regard to the progressive increase in the targets for recycling and preparing for re-use, which mean that different levels of effort will be required to achieve the goals set, some flexibility is needed in relation to the time schedule for meeting the targets.
As acknowledged in the proposal, many Member States have not yet completely developed the necessary waste management infrastructure. It is therefore essential to set clear policy objectives in order to avoid locking recyclable materials at the bottom of the waste hierarchy. Without calling the objectives themselves into question, the feasibility of complying with them demands a degree of time flexibility.
Moreover, the existence of new objectives, revised upward, justifies the provision of new resources with which to achieve them. It is therefore justified for the European Union to increase the resources placed at the disposal of the Member States in order to support them in making the necessary investments.
The right conditions and incentives also need to be created to make it an attractive proposition for industry to incorporate packaging waste in its production processes in order to produce added-value products while saving virgin raw materials.
In the meantime, energy recovery should remain a viable option for the management of packaging and packaging waste wherever it is technically, economically and environmentally justified.
Extended producer responsibility schemes are a suitable means of both preventing the formation of packaging waste and creating systems that will guarantee the return and/or collection of used packaging and/or packaging waste from the consumer, other final user, or from the waste stream, and the reuse or recovery including recycling of the packaging and/or packaging waste collected.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Waste management in the Union should be improved, with a view to protecting, preserving and improving the quality of the environment, protecting human health, ensuring prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources and promoting a more circular economy. |
(1) Waste management in the Union should be improved, with a view to protecting, preserving and improving the quality of the environment, including the marine environment and wildlife, protecting human health, ensuring prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources and promoting a more circular economy, reducing resource dependence in the Union and increasing resource efficiency. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1a) Member States should foster a sustainable bio-economy with the aim of using waste as a resource. In accordance with that aim, waste prevention is the most efficient way to improve resource efficiency, and Member States should take measures to prevent unnecessary packaging, and reduce the manufacture and consumption of single-use packaging. Member States should be able to include market restrictions of superfluous packaging. Member States should require all packaging placed on the market to comply with minimum requirements that promote the design of circular packaging, which could include the use of recycled content, and material with low greenhouse gas emissions. The Commission should promote, as appropriate, the preparation of Union standards and guidelines relating to the essential requirements referred to in Annex II. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1b) Littering and improper disposal of packaging and packaging waste has negative impacts on both the marine environment and the Union economy and poses unnecessary risks to public health. Many of the most commonly found items on beaches also include packaging waste, with long-term impacts on the environment which affect tourism and public enjoyment of these natural areas. Additionally, packaging waste that makes its way into the marine environment subverts the priority order of the waste hierarchy, in particular by avoiding preparation for reuse, recycling and other recovery prior to its improper disposal. In order to reduce the disproportionate contribution of packaging waste to marine litter, a binding target should be established, supported by targeted measures adopted by Member States. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) Through a progressive increase of the existing targets on preparing for re-use and recycling of packaging waste, it should be ensured that economically valuable waste materials are progressively and effectively recovered through proper waste management and in line with the waste hierarchy. That way it should be ensured that valuable materials found in waste are returned into the European economy, thus making progress in the implementation of the Raw Materials Initiative15 and the creation of a circular economy. |
(5) Through a progressive increase of the existing targets on preparing for re-use and recycling of packaging waste, it should be ensured that economically valuable waste materials are progressively and effectively recovered through proper waste management and in line with the waste hierarchy. That way it should be ensured that valuable materials found in waste are returned into the European economy, thus making progress in the implementation of the Raw Materials Initiative15 and the creation of a circular economy, and, in the case of packaging materials, without prejudice to food safety, consumer health and food contact materials. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 COM(2013) 442. |
15 COM(2013) 442. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5a) At the same time, conditions and incentives also need to be created to make it an attractive proposition for industry to incorporate packaging waste in its production processes, in order to produce added-value products while saving virgin raw materials. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) Many Member States have not yet completely developed the necessary waste management infrastructure. It is therefore essential to set clear policy objectives in order to avoid locking recyclable materials at the bottom of the waste hierarchy. |
(6) Many Member States have not yet completely developed the necessary waste management infrastructure for recycling. It is therefore essential to set clear policy objectives for the construction of waste treatment facilities and installations needed for prevention, reuse and recycling, in order to avoid locking recyclable materials at the bottom of the waste hierarchy and to set incentives for investments into an innovative waste management infrastructure for recycling. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6a) The collection and recycling of waste oils would have considerable economic and ecological benefits from the standpoint of ensuring supplies of raw materials, moving towards a circular economy and helping to reduce dependency on crude oil supplies. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) With the combination of recycling targets and landfill restrictions laid down in Directives 2008/98/EC and 1999/31/EC, the Union targets for energy recovery and the recycling targets for packaging waste laid down in Directive 94/62/EC are no longer necessary. |
(7) With the combination of recycling targets and landfill restrictions laid down in Directives 2008/98/EC and 1999/31/EC, the Union targets for energy recovery and the recycling targets for packaging waste laid down in Directive 94/62/EC are no longer necessary. Energy recovery could, however, still be an option for the management of packaging and packaging waste only when it is technically, economically and environmentally justified, which will require a careful environmental impact assessment that will have studied the environmental impact of the packaging at all stages. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7а) Member States’ national strategies should include public awareness-raising, in the form of the various incentives and benefits deriving from products made from recycled waste, which will encourage investment in the recycled products sector. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) This Directive sets long-term objectives for the Union’s waste management and gives the economic operators and the Member States a clear direction for the necessary investments to attain the objectives of this Directive. In developing their national waste management strategies and planning investments in waste management infrastructure, Member States should make a sound use of the European Structural and Investment Funds in line with the waste hierarchy by promoting prevention, re-use and recycling. |
(8) This Directive sets long-term objectives for the Union’s waste management and gives the economic operators and the Member States a clear direction for the necessary investments to attain the objectives of this Directive. In developing their national waste management strategies and planning investments in waste management infrastructure, Member States should make a sound use of the European Structural and Investment Funds in line with the waste hierarchy by promoting, as a priority, prevention and re-use, followed by recycling. European Structural and Investment Funds should not be used for financing incinerators or landfills. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10a) Separate collection should also be further strengthened in terms of packaging and packaging waste. However when life cycle analysis shows environmental gains, exceptions could be made. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) Member States should, for the purposes of calculating whether the preparation for re-use and recycling targets are achieved, be able to take into account products and components that are prepared for re-use by recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes. To ensure harmonised conditions for those calculations, the Commission will adopt detailed rules on the determination of recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes and on the collection, verification and reporting of data. |
(11) Member States should, for the purposes of calculating whether the preparation for re-use and recycling targets are achieved, be able to take into account products and components that are prepared for re-use by recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes, and recycling operators. To ensure harmonised conditions for those calculations, the Commission will adopt detailed rules on the determination of recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes and on the collection, verification and reporting of data. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) In order to ensure the reliability of the data gathered on preparation for re-use it is essential to establish common rules for reporting. Similarly, it is important to lay down more precisely the rules according to which Member States should report what is effectively recycled and can be counted towards the attainment of the recycling targets. To that effect, as a general rule, the reporting on the attainment of the recycling targets must be based on the input to the final recycling process. In order to limit administrative burdens, Member States should be allowed, under strict conditions, to report recycling rates on the basis of the output of sorting facilities. Losses in weight of materials or substances due to physical and/or chemical transformation processes inherent to the final recycling process should not be deducted from the weight of the waste reported as recycled. |
(12) In order to ensure the reliability of the data gathered on preparation for re-use it is essential to establish common rules for reporting. That data should be collected in line with standards and specifications that support open data objectives and should be made available as open data. Similarly, it is important to lay down more precisely the rules according to which Member States should report what is effectively recycled and can be counted towards the attainment of the recycling targets. To that effect, as a general rule, the reporting on the attainment of the recycling targets must be based on the input to the final recycling process. In order to limit administrative burdens, Member States should be allowed, under strict conditions, to report recycling rates on the basis of the output of sorting facilities. Losses in weight of materials or substances due to physical and/or chemical transformation processes inherent to the final recycling process should not be deducted from the weight of the waste reported as recycled. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Recital 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) Statistical data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of statistics should be improved by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. |
(14) Statistical data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of statistics should be improved by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. The quality check report should be drawn up in accordance with a harmonised format. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(15a) Where possible, Member States should incentivise the use of materials such as permanent materials that have a superior value for the circular economy as they can be classified as materials that can be recycled without loss of quality, regardless of how often the material is recycled. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Recital 15 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(15b) An important objective of this Directive is to improve conditions on the internal market. Therefore, reporting by the Commission on the effects of this Directive on the functioning of the internal market is considered as an important measure. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(16) Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among Member States. Therefore, when preparing the reports on compliance with the targets set out in Directive 94/62/EC, Member States should be required to use the most recent methodology developed by the Commission and the national statistical offices of the Member States. |
(16) Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among Member States. Therefore, when preparing the reports on compliance with the targets set out in Directive 94/62/EC, Member States should be required to use a common methodology for data collection and processing developed by the Commission in cooperation with the national statistical offices of the Member States and the national authorities responsible for waste management. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Recital 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(21) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely on the one hand, to prevent any impact from packaging and packaging waste on the environment or to reduce such impact, thus providing a high level of environmental protection, and, on the other hand, to ensure the functioning of the internal market and to avoid obstacles to trade and distortion and restriction of competition within the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the measures, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives, |
(21) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to prevent any impact from packaging and packaging waste on the environment or to reduce such impact, thus providing a high level of environmental protection, taking into account the functioning of the internal market, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the measures, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(21a) Member States should ensure that high levels of occupational health and safety requirements are put in place for all Union workers, in line with existing Union law, and in accordance with the specific risks faced by workers in some production, recycling and waste sectors. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Recital 21 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(21b) In the vast majority of cases, the provision of packaging does not depend on and is not chosen by the final consumer but rather by the producer. Extended producer responsibility schemes are a suitable means of both preventing the formation of packaging waste and creating systems that will guarantee the return and/or collection of used packaging and/or packaging waste from the consumer, other final user, or from the waste stream, and the reuse or recovery including recycling of the packaging and/or packaging waste that is collected. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point - 1 (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 1 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 3 – point 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 3 – point 12 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 94/62/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 4 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 c (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 d (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 3a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c b (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 11a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 94/62/EC Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 c (new) Directive 94/62/ CE Article 8 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d Directive 92/64/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3 b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3 c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d Directive 94/62/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 15 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 b (new) Directive 94/62/EC Article 15a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph - 1 (new) Directive 94/62/EC Annex II – point 1 – indent 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph -1 a(new) Directive 94/62/EC Annex II – point 3 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
Directive amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0596 – C8-0385/2015 – 2015/0276(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 14.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 14.12.2015 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
João Ferreira 25.2.2016 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
14.6.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
13.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
47 11 4 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Nikolay Barekov, Nicolas Bay, Bendt Bendtsen, Xabier Benito Ziluaga, José Blanco López, David Borrelli, Jerzy Buzek, Angelo Ciocca, Edward Czesak, Jakop Dalunde, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Christian Ehler, Fredrick Federley, Ashley Fox, Adam Gierek, Theresa Griffin, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Eva Kaili, Kaja Kallas, Barbara Kappel, Krišjānis Kariņš, Seán Kelly, Jaromír Kohlíček, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Janusz Lewandowski, Ernest Maragall, Edouard Martin, Angelika Mlinar, Nadine Morano, Dan Nica, Morten Helveg Petersen, Miroslav Poche, Carolina Punset, Herbert Reul, Paul Rübig, Algirdas Saudargas, Sergei Stanishev, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Antonio Tajani, Dario Tamburrano, Patrizia Toia, Evžen Tošenovský, Claude Turmes, Vladimir Urutchev, Henna Virkkunen, Martina Werner, Lieve Wierinck, Anna Záborská, Flavio Zanonato, Carlos Zorrinho |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Michał Boni, Rosa D’Amato, Esther de Lange, Jens Geier, Benedek Jávor, Olle Ludvigsson, Vladimír Maňka, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Clare Moody, Maria Spyraki |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Albert Deß |
||||
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title |
Directive amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0596 – C8-0385/2015 – 2015/0276(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
2.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 14.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary |
ECON 14.12.2015 |
ITRE 14.12.2015 |
JURI 14.12.2015 |
|
|
Not delivering opinions Date of decision |
ECON 17.12.2015 |
JURI 28.1.2016 |
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Simona Bonafè 22.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
15.6.2016 |
29.9.2016 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
24.1.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
58 7 1 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Marco Affronte, Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Zoltán Balczó, Catherine Bearder, Ivo Belet, Simona Bonafè, Biljana Borzan, Paul Brannen, Nessa Childers, Birgit Collin-Langen, Mireille D’Ornano, Miriam Dalli, Seb Dance, Angélique Delahaye, Mark Demesmaeker, Stefan Eck, José Inácio Faria, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Francesc Gambús, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Jens Gieseke, Julie Girling, Sylvie Goddyn, Françoise Grossetête, Andrzej Grzyb, Jytte Guteland, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jean-François Jalkh, Benedek Jávor, Josu Juaristi Abaunz, Karin Kadenbach, Kateřina Konečná, Urszula Krupa, Giovanni La Via, Peter Liese, Norbert Lins, Valentinas Mazuronis, Susanne Melior, Massimo Paolucci, Piernicola Pedicini, Julia Reid, Frédérique Ries, Michèle Rivasi, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Davor Škrlec, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Ivica Tolić, Estefanía Torres Martínez, Nils Torvalds, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Damiano Zoffoli |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Renata Briano, Herbert Dorfmann, James Nicholson, Stanislav Polčák, Gabriele Preuß, Keith Taylor, Tiemo Wölken, Kosma Złotowski |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Xabier Benito Ziluaga, Richard Corbett, Sander Loones |
||||
Date tabled |
7.2.2017 |
||||