REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment
30.1.2017 - (COM(2015)0593 – C8‑0383/2015 – 2015/0272(COD)) - ***I
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Rapporteur: Simona Bonafè
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment
(COM(2015)0593 – C8‑0383/2015 – 2015/0272(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2015)0593),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 192(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0383/2015),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the French Senate, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 27 April 2016[1],
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 15 June 2016[2],
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A8-0013/2017),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Waste management in the Union should be improved, with a view to protecting, preserving and improving the quality of the environment, protecting human health, ensuring prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources and promoting a more circular economy. |
(1) Waste management in the Union should be improved, with a view to protecting, preserving and improving the quality of the environment, protecting human health, ensuring prudent and efficient use of natural resources and promoting the principles of the circular economy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1a) A clean, effective and sustainable circular economy requires the removal of hazardous substances from products at the design stage and in this context circular economy should recognise explicit provisions in the Seventh Environment Action Programme which calls for the development of non-toxic material cycles so that recycled waste can be used as a major, reliable source of raw material for the Union. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The EU should focus on creating a clean circular economy and avoid possible major risk of a future loss in public and market confidence in recycled material while creating an endless legacy. The main burden for recyclers is the presence of hazardous substances in material. The focus of the EU should be on getting these hazardous substances out of products and waste, and not endangering public health and the environment by exempting certain classes of businesses or products from safe requirements and by making it impossible to identify those contaminated materials in the future. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1b) It is necessary to ensure the effective and low energy consumption management of secondary raw materials, and priority should be given to R&D efforts towards that objective. The Commission should also consider putting forward a proposal on the classification of waste to support the creation of a Union secondary raw materials market. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1c) Once recycled material re-enters the economy as it receives end-of-waste status, either by complying with specific end-of-waste criteria or being incorporated in a new product, it is required to be fully compliant with Union chemicals legislation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
REACH does not apply to waste, as stated in Article 2(2) “Waste as defined in Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council is not a substance, mixture or article within the meaning of Article 3 of this Regulation”. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2a) The industrial landscape has substantially changed in recent years, as a result of technology advances and of increasing globalised flows of merchandise. Those factors pose new challenges to the management and treatment of waste that is environmentally responsible that should be addressed by a combination of increased research efforts and of targeted regulatory tools. Planned obsolescence is an expanding issue, intrinsically contradictory with the goals of a circular economy, and therefore should be addressed with the objective of rooting it out, through a concerted effort of all main stakeholders, industry, customers and regulatory authorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) Statistical data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of statistics should be improved by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. |
(3) Data and information reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of reported data should be improved by establishing a common methodology for collection and processing of data based on reliable sources and by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. Reliable reporting of data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among Member States. Therefore, when reporting on the achievement of the targets set out in these Directives, Member States should use the common methodology developed by the Commission in cooperation with the national statistical offices of Member States and the national authorities responsible for waste management. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3a) Member States should ensure that the separate collection of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) is followed by proper treatment. To ensure a level playing field and compliance with waste legislation and the concept of the circular economy, the Commission should develop common standards for the treatment of WEEE, as mandated by Directive 2012/19/EU. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among a level playing field between Member States. Therefore, when preparing the reports on compliance with the targets set out in these Directives, Member States should be required to use the most recent methodology developed by the Commission and the national statistical offices of the Member States. |
(4) Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among a level playing field between Member States. Therefore, when preparing the reports on compliance with the targets set out in these Directives, Member States should be required to use the common methodology for data collection and processing developed by the Commission in cooperation with the national statistical offices of the Member States. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to improve quality and reliability of data across the EU and in addition to common calculation methods existing for the three Directives concerned, the Commission should develop a common methodology for the collection of data and its processing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4a) In order to help achieve the targets laid down in this Directive and to help boost the transition to a circular economy, the Commission should promote the coordination and exchange of information and best practices between Member States and between different sectors of the economy. That exchange could be facilitated through communication platforms that could help raise awareness of new industrial solutions and allow for a better overview of available capacities and would contribute to connecting the waste industry and other sectors and to support industrial symbiosis. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4b) The waste hierarchy laid down in Directive 2008/98/EC applies as an order of priority in Union waste prevention and management law. That hierarchy therefore applies in the context of end-of-life vehicles, batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and waste electrical and electronic equipment. When complying with the objective of this Directive, Member States should take the necessary measures to take the waste hierarchy priorities into account and ensure the practical implementation of those priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5a) Since there is a growing need to handle and recycle waste within the Union, in line with the circular economy, emphasis should be given to ensuring that the shipment of waste is in line with the principles and requirements of Union environmental law, in particular the principle of proximity, priority for recovery and self-sufficiency. The Commission should examine the desirability of introducing a one-stop-shop for the administrative procedure for shipments of waste, with a view to reducing administrative burdens. Member States should take the necessary measures to prevent illegal shipment of waste. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 7a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7a) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 2000/53/EC in respect of the common methodology for data collection and processing and of the format for reporting data concerning the implementation of reuse and recovery targets for end-of life vehicles and for the implementation of Directive 2012/19/EU in respect of the methodology for data collection and processing and the format for reporting data concerning the implementation of the targets laid down for collection and recovery of electrical and electronic equipment, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard recital concerning the implementing powers of the Commission needs to be added. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7b) In order to lay down the methodology for data collection and processing and the format for reporting data for batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law‑Making (OJ L 123 12.5.2016, p.1). In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph -1 (new) Directive 2000/53/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to ensure coherence and legal certainty among EU waste legislation, a reference to the waste hierarchy in articles 1, 6 and 7 is strongly needed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2000/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2000/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2000/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 ca (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2000/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2000/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 da (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) Directive 2000/53/EC Article 9 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Article 22 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point -a (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Article 23 – title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2006/66/EC Article 23 –paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Article 23 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Article 23 aa (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2012/19/EU Article 16 – paragraph 5a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2012/19/EU Article 16 – paragraph 5c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2012/19/EU Article 16 – paragraph 5ca (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2012/19/EU Article 16 – paragraph 5 d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2012/19/EU Article 16 – paragraph 5 da (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 16 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
The aim of this proposal is simplify the obligations of Member States as far as reporting obligations are concerned and align them with the reporting provisions in the Waste Framework Directive, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive and the Landfill Directive. This proposal also aims at aligning the comitology provisions to the Lisbon Treaty.
Rapporteur broadly agrees with the objectives of this proposal and is of the view that verification of implementation of the targets should be based on sound and reliable data. Therefore, Member States should focus their efforts on proper collection and transmission of data to the Commission. Amendments aim to strengthen the quality of data by means of introducing a quality check in the Batteries Directive. The Commission should also develop a common methodology for collection, organisation and processing of data in cooperation with national statistical offices in order to ensure comparability of quality data. Amendments also aim at retaining the obligation on the European Commission to assess and report on the implementation of the Directives as well as on their impacts on the environment and human health. In the evaluation reports, Commission should assess if the essential parts of the Directives, including the targets, may require revision in order to keep the legislation fit for purpose. The reports should be accompanied by legislative proposals, if a need for improvement and more ambition arises. Amendments were also introduced to align the text to the new Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 April 2016.
Given that WEEE, batteries and ELV are subject to increasing demand leading to diverse end-of-life waste and that this waste is a source of valuable and scarce materials, the three Directives should be made subject to a comprehensive review in the near future in the context of the circular economy based on proper impact assessment and taking into account eco-design, the need to recover more secondary raw materials, technological development as well as other Union's circular economy policy objectives and initiatives.
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (20.10.2016)
for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment
(COM(2015)0593 – C8‑0383/2015 – 2015/0272(COD))
Rapporteur: Pavel Telička
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
On 2 December 2015, the European Commission adopted a new circular economy package, which contains the Action plan for the Circular Economy and four legislative proposals on waste. The aim of this legislative proposal is to set up targets for waste reduction including targets for landfill, reuse and recycling, to be met by 2030. The proposal also establishes an ambitious and credible long-term path for waste management and recycling activities.
Even though the ITRE Committee decided to split the package into four separate files, these are closely interlinked. Many of the changes regarding statistics and definitions of waste are presented within the Waste Framework Directive (WFD), while targets and obligations based on these definitions or statistics are presented within other three directives. Hence it is necessary to ensure coherence among all files.
The Rapporteur for the opinion welcomes the EC revised proposal, as it represents broader, more holistic and also more realistic approach. Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management is indeed a key for ensuring a level playing field among Member States and for an efficient waste management in the EU. Further improvement in this field is undoubtedly needed. Targets proposed by the European Commission have to be ambitious, yet realistic and achievable for all member States, otherwise the EU face the risk of fragmentation of the Internal Market and non-inclusive and thus uneven development in this field. A long-term vision with sufficiently ambitious goals is the proper way to proceed. However, the Rapporteur has still doubts about the methodology used for setting targets regardless of their appropriateness. Also, after collection of reliable and comparable data, it will be necessary to review the targets and ambitions to appropriate level. The rapporteur also regrets that the entire proposal lacks a focus on education and information which should stand in the very core of the transformation.
The aim of the Amending Directives on end-of-life vehicles, batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and waste electrical and electronic equipment is to simplify the reporting obligation for Member States. The Rapporteur´s position is to simplify legislation for Member States and undertakings not to impose on them further unnecessary obligations and create a level playing field between market participants. It is not desirable to create a new additional regulation, but rather to create an environment for businesses, in which they can apply the most environmentally and cost-efficient solutions, in line with the long-term strategy. Member States have to create appropriate conditions including a fiscal incentives and support of industrial symbiosis to create such conditions so that manufacturers can live up to their responsibilities. The Rapporteur is however wondering whether the Commission´s proposal on batteries and accumulators will lead to such conclusions.
If the EU wants to realistically consider a shift to the Circular Economy, it is necessary to create an adequate infrastructure and an open market for transport and waste management in the EU. This has not worked out so far and in the future it may become an obstacle for efficient waste management through the EU. The Rapporteur is therefore proposing that the Commission should examine the desirability of introducing a one-stop-shop for the administrative procedure for waste shipments, with a view to reducing administrative burden and expediting the procedure.
Another important element of the framework is the treatment of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) after being separately collected. Separate collection of WEEE does not make sense if not followed by an adequate treatment. Some of the EU Member States have already introduced mandatory standards for treatment of WEEE (EN 50625 series), the Rapporteur therefore calls on the Commission to take measures to make compliance with the EN 50625 series on treatment of WEEE mandatory.
The Rapporteur would also like to bring the attention to the export of products considered as an electronic waste and secondary raw materials (WEEE but also metal scrap, plastic, etc.) outside of the EU. The EU should focus on monitoring of a treatment and recycling of such materials outside its´ territory, as mentioned in the WFD, but also on the illegal export of these raw materials to the third countries, which is primarily a question of enforcement of the current legislation. The Commission's proposal on waste legislation does not provide a room for addressing these issues. The Commission should, however, address this when revising Regulation on shipments of waste and related legislation, with aim to prevent export outside of the EU and focus on an implementation and enforcement of the current legislation. It is positive that the Commission is working on further proposals in areas such as eco-design or implementation of certain directives, which could help reduce the illegal export of e-waste.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Citation 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
having regard to the Protocol (No. 2) of the TEU on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Waste management in the Union should be improved, with a view to protecting, preserving and improving the quality of the environment, protecting human health, ensuring prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources and promoting a more circular economy. |
(1) Waste management in the Union should be improved, with a view to protecting, preserving and improving the quality of the environment, protecting human health, ensuring prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources, promoting a more circular economy, increasing energy efficiency and reducing the level of the Union’s dependence. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1a) It is necessary to ensure the effective and low energy consumption management of secondary raw materials, and priority should be given to R&D efforts towards that objective. The Commission should also consider putting forward a proposal on the classification of waste to support the creation of a Union secondary raw materials market. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2a) The industrial landscape has substantially changed in recent years, as a result of technology advances and of increasing globalised flows of merchandise. Those factors pose new challenges to the management and treatment of waste that is environmentally responsible that should be addressed by a combination of increased research efforts and of targeted regulatory tools. Planned obsolescence is an expanding issue, intrinsically contradictory with the goals of a circular economy, and therefore should be addressed with the objective of rooting it out, through a concerted effort of all main stakeholders, industry, customers and regulatory authorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) Statistical data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of statistics should be improved by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. |
(3) Statistical data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of statistics should be improved by establishing a harmonised methodology for data collection and processing and by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, which should be Eurostat, and by deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report, which should be based on a harmonised format. Reliable reporting of comparable statistical data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among Member States. Therefore, when preparing the implementation reports under this Directive, Member States should use the most recent methodology developed by the Commission and the national statistical offices of the Member States. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3a) Member States should ensure that the separate collection of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) is followed by proper treatment. If some but not all WEEE treatment operators have proper WEEE treatment operations in place, environmental risks will arise. Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council1a mandated the Commission to develop common standards for treatment of WEEE (EN 50625 series). To ensure a level playing field and compliance with waste legislation and the concept of the circular economy, the Commission should issue an implementing act to make these standards legally binding. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_____________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (OJ L 197, 24.7.2012, p.38). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present text |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among a level playing field between Member States. Therefore, when preparing the reports on compliance with the targets set out in these Directives, Member States should be required to use the most recent methodology developed by the Commission and the national statistical offices of the Member States. |
deleted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4a) The waste hierarchy laid down in Directive 2008/98/EC applies as an order of priority in Union waste prevention and management legislation. That hierarchy therefore applies in the context of end-of-life vehicles, batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and waste electrical and electronic equipment. When complying with the objective of this Directive, Member States should take the necessary measures to take the waste hierarchy priorities into account and ensure the practical implementation of those priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5a) In order to fulfil the objectives of this Directive it should be easier and less costly to ship waste within the Union, with simpler procedures for businesses, while maintaining environmental standards. The Commission should address this when revising Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
______________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste (OJ L 190, 12.7.2006, p. 1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5b) Since there is a growing need to handle and recycle waste within the Union, in line with the circular economy, emphasis should be given to ensuring that the shipment of waste is in line with the principles and requirements of environmental law, in particular the principle of proximity, priority for recovery and self-sufficiency. The Commission should examine the desirability of introducing a one-stop-shop for the administrative procedure for shipments of waste, with a view to reducing administrative burdens. Member States should take the necessary measures to prevent illegal shipment of waste. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7a) This Directive has been adopted taking into account the commitments set out in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 and it should be implemented and applied in accordance with the guidance contained in the same Agreement. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph -1 (new) Directive 2000/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph -1 a (new) Directive 2000/53/EC Article 8a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2000/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1a to 1d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) Directive 2000/53/EC Annex IIa (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Article 15 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Article 21 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Article 22 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Annex IVa (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 b (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 6 – title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 c (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 6 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 d (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 8 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 e (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 f (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 g (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 h (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 10 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2012/19/EU Article 16 – paragraph 5a to 5d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Article 17 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2a (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Annex Xa | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Annex I (new) Directive 2000/53/EC Annex IIa (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a directive Annex II (new) Directive 2006/66/EC Annex IVa (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a directive Annex III (new) Directive 2012/19/EU Annex Xa (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
Directive amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0593 – C8-0383/2015 – 2015/0272(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 14.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 14.12.2015 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Pavel Telička 2.2.2016 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
14.6.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
13.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
55 10 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Nikolay Barekov, Nicolas Bay, Bendt Bendtsen, Xabier Benito Ziluaga, José Blanco López, David Borrelli, Jerzy Buzek, Angelo Ciocca, Edward Czesak, Jakop Dalunde, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Fredrick Federley, Ashley Fox, Adam Gierek, Theresa Griffin, Roger Helmer, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Eva Kaili, Kaja Kallas, Barbara Kappel, Krišjānis Kariņš, Seán Kelly, Jaromír Kohlíček, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Janusz Lewandowski, Ernest Maragall, Edouard Martin, Angelika Mlinar, Nadine Morano, Dan Nica, Morten Helveg Petersen, Miroslav Poche, Carolina Punset, Herbert Reul, Paul Rübig, Algirdas Saudargas, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, Sergei Stanishev, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Antonio Tajani, Dario Tamburrano, Patrizia Toia, Evžen Tošenovský, Claude Turmes, Vladimir Urutchev, Henna Virkkunen, Martina Werner, Lieve Wierinck, Anna Záborská, Flavio Zanonato, Carlos Zorrinho |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Pilar Ayuso, Michał Boni, Rosa D’Amato, Esther de Lange, Cornelia Ernst, Francesc Gambús, Jens Geier, Benedek Jávor, Olle Ludvigsson, Vladimír Maňka, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Clare Moody, Maria Spyraki |
||||
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title |
Directive amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0593 – C8-0383/2015 – 2015/0272(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
2.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 14.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 14.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Simona Bonafè 22.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
15.6.2016 |
29.9.2016 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
24.1.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
58 7 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Marco Affronte, Pilar Ayuso, Ivo Belet, Simona Bonafè, Biljana Borzan, Paul Brannen, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Nessa Childers, Birgit Collin-Langen, Mireille D’Ornano, Miriam Dalli, Seb Dance, Angélique Delahaye, Mark Demesmaeker, Stefan Eck, José Inácio Faria, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Francesc Gambús, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Jens Gieseke, Julie Girling, Sylvie Goddyn, Françoise Grossetête, Jytte Guteland, György Hölvényi, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jean-François Jalkh, Benedek Jávor, Josu Juaristi Abaunz, Karin Kadenbach, Kateřina Konečná, Urszula Krupa, Giovanni La Via, Jo Leinen, Peter Liese, Norbert Lins, Susanne Melior, Massimo Paolucci, Gilles Pargneaux, Piernicola Pedicini, Bolesław G. Piecha, Julia Reid, Frédérique Ries, Michèle Rivasi, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Davor Škrlec, Renate Sommer, Ivica Tolić, Estefanía Torres Martínez, Nils Torvalds, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Damiano Zoffoli |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Nicola Caputo, Fredrick Federley, Martin Häusling, James Nicholson, Younous Omarjee, Stanislav Polčák, Keith Taylor |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Mary Honeyball, Monika Smolková, Helga Stevens |
||||
Date tabled |
30.1.2017 |
||||