REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC
3.6.2016 - (COM(2015)0671 – C8‑0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Rapporteur: Artis Pabriks
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC
(COM(2015)0671 – C8‑0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2015)0671),
– having regard to Article 294(2), and Article 77(2)(b) and (d) and Article 79(2)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0408/2015),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Fisheries (A8-0200/2016),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) On 25 and 26 June 2015,12 the European Council called for wider efforts in resolving the migrant crisis in a comprehensive manner, including through the reinforcement of the management of borders to better manage growing mixed migratory flows. Furthermore, on 23 September 2015, 13 the European Council stressed the need to tackle the dramatic situation at the external borders as well as to strengthen the controls at those borders, notably through additional resources for the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, the European Asylum Support Office and Europol, with human resources and technical contributions from Member States. |
(1) On 25 and 26 June 2015,12 the European Council called for wider efforts in resolving the unprecedented migratory flows in a comprehensive manner, including through the reinforcement of the management of borders to better manage growing mixed migratory flows. Furthermore, on 23 September 2015,13 the European Council stressed the need to tackle the dramatic situation at the external borders as well as to strengthen the controls at those borders, notably through additional resources for the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, the European Asylum Support Office and Europol, with human resources and technical contributions from Member States. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Meeting of the European Council, Conclusions of 25 and 26 June 2015. |
12 Meeting of the European Council, Conclusions of 25 and 26 June 2015. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 Informal meeting of EU Heads of State or Government on migration, Statement of 23 September 2015. |
13 Informal meeting of EU Heads of State or Government on migration, Statement of 23 September 2015. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) To ensure the effective implementation of the European integrated border management, a European Border and Coast Guard should be established. The European Border and Coast Guard, which comprises the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and national authorities which are responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks, relies upon the common use of information, capabilities and systems at national level and the response of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency at Union level. |
(4) To ensure the effective implementation of the European integrated border management, a European Border and Coast Guard should be established and should be provided with the requisite financial and human resources and equipment. The European Border and Coast Guard, which comprises the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and national authorities which are responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks, relies upon the common use of information, capabilities and systems at national level and the response of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency at Union level. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(9b) The Agency should carry out its tasks without prejudice to the competence of the Member States with regard to defence. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(9c) The extended tasks and competence of the Agency should be balanced with strengthened fundamental rights safeguards and increased accountability. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should prepare general and tailored risk analysis based on a common integrated risk analysis model, to be applied by the Agency itself and by Member States. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should, based also on information provided by Member States, provide adequate information and intelligence covering all aspects relevant to European integrated border management, especially border control, return, irregular secondary movements of third-country nationals within the Union, prevention of cross-border crime including facilitation of irregular immigration, trafficking in human beings and terrorism, as well as the situation at neighbouring third countries, so as to allow for appropriate measures to be taken or to tackle identified threats and risks with a view to improving the integrated management of external borders. |
(11) The Agency should prepare general and tailored risk analysis based on a common integrated risk analysis model, to be applied by the Agency itself and by Member States. The Agency should, based also on information provided by Member States, provide adequate information and intelligence covering all aspects relevant to European integrated border management, as well as the situation at neighbouring third countries, so as to allow for appropriate measures to be taken or to tackle identified threats and risks with a view to improving the integrated management of the external borders. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(21b) The possible existence of an arrangement between a Member State and a third country does not absolve the Agency or the Member States from their obligations under Union or international law, in particular as regards compliance with the principle of non-refoulement, where they are aware or ought to be aware that systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure and in the reception conditions of asylum seekers in that third country amount to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker would face a serious risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment or where they are aware or ought to be aware that that third country engages in practices in contravention of the principle of non-refoulement. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the context of return operations and interventions, it is imperative to reiterate the guiding principles on which any return of a third-country national may be carried out. Based on Recital 13 of Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 establishing rules for the surveillance of the external sea borders in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by Frontex. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(22a) Special provision should be made for staff involved in activities relating to returns to specify their tasks, powers and responsibilities. Special instructions should also be issued with regard to the power of the pilots in charge of aircraft and the extension of the criminal jurisdiction of the country of registration of the aircraft under international aviation law. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(27) National authorities carrying out coast guard functions are responsible for a wide range of tasks, including but not limited to maritime safety, security, search and rescue, border control, fisheries control, customs control, general law enforcement and environmental protection. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency, the European Fisheries Control Agency established by Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 16 and the European Maritime Safety Agency established by Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council 17 should therefore strengthen their cooperation both with each other and with the national authorities carrying out coast guard functions to increase maritime situational awareness as well as to support coherent and cost-efficient action. |
(27) National authorities carrying out coast guard functions are responsible for a wide range of tasks, including but not limited to maritime safety, security, search and rescue, border control, fisheries control, customs control, general law enforcement and environmental protection. The Agency, the European Fisheries Control Agency established by Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 16 and the European Maritime Safety Agency established by Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council 17 should therefore strengthen their cooperation both with each other and with the national authorities carrying out coast guard functions to increase maritime situational awareness as well as to support coherent and cost-efficient action. Synergies between the various actors in the maritime environment should be in line with the Europeans integrated border management and maritime security strategy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 of 26 April 2005 establishing a Community Fisheries Control Agency and amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p.1). |
16 Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 of 26 April 2005 establishing a Community Fisheries Control Agency and amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p.1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (OJ L 208, 5.8.2002, p.1). |
17 Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (OJ L 208, 5.8.2002, p.1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(27a) Cooperation on coast guard functions, in particular by means of enhanced collaboration between national authorities, the Agency, the European Fisheries Control Agency and the European Maritime Safety Agency, should not affect the division of powers between the agencies as regards the definition of their missions and should not impinge on their autonomy or independence in respect of their initial assignments. That cooperation is also intended to enable the creation of synergies between them, without changing their mission statements. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
European cooperation on coast guard functions does not seek to reduce the powers of the EMSA or the EFCA. The aim of cooperation is to strengthen the agencies’ primary missions while establishing synergies, in such a way as to improve knowledge of the maritime situation and the EU’s offshore response capability. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(28c) In accordance with the Charter and the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, a child's best interests are to be a primary consideration in the activities of the Agency. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(34) In order to guarantee the autonomy of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, it should be granted an autonomous budget whose revenue comes essentially from a contribution from the Union. The Union budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Union contribution and any other subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the European Union are concerned. The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors. |
(34) In order to guarantee the autonomy of the Agency, it should be granted an autonomous budget whose revenue comes essentially from a contribution from the Union. The Union budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Union contribution and any other subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the European Union are concerned. The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors. The budget adopted by the Management Board should be balanced in terms of addressing different aspects of the Agency's activities, including ensuring respect for fundamental rights. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(36) Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents 21 should apply to the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. |
(36) Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents 21 should apply to the Agency. The Agency should be as transparent as possible about its activities, without jeopardising the attainment of the objective of its operations. It should make public all relevant information on all of its activities, and should ensure that the public and any interested party are rapidly given information with regard to its work. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43). |
21 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 - paragraph 1 – point 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 52 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 53 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(14b) ‘child’ means a natural person below the age of 18 years unless under the law applicable to the child majority is attained earlier; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 54 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(14c) ‘third party’ means a legal entity recognised as such by a Member State or an international organisation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 55 Proposal for a regulation Article 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 56 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 57 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 58 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 59 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 60 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 61 Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Agency and the national authorities which are responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks, shall be subject to a duty to cooperate in good faith, and an obligation to exchange information. |
The Agency and the national authorities which are responsible for border management and for returns, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks, shall be subject to a duty to cooperate in good faith, and an obligation to exchange information. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 62 Proposal for a regulation Article 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 63 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 64 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 65 Proposal for a regulation Article 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 66 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 67 Proposal for a regulation Article 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 68 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 69 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 70 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point i | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 71 Proposal for a regulation Article 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 72 Proposal for a regulation Article 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 73 Proposal for a regulation Article 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 74 Proposal for a regulation Article 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 75 Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 76 Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Members of the teams shall, in the performance of their tasks and in the exercise of their powers, fully respect fundamental rights, including access to asylum procedures, and human dignity. Any measures taken in the performance of their tasks and in the exercise of their powers shall be proportionate to the objectives pursued by such measures. While performing their tasks and exercising their powers, they shall not discriminate against persons on grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. |
4. Members of the teams shall, in the performance of their tasks and in the exercise of their powers, fully respect fundamental rights, including access to asylum procedures, and human dignity. Any measures taken in the performance of their tasks and in the exercise of their powers shall be proportionate to the objectives pursued by such measures. While performing their tasks and exercising their powers, they shall not discriminate against persons on grounds of gender, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 77 Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b) monitor the correct implementation of the operational plan; |
(b) monitor the correct implementation of the operational plan, including on the protection of fundamental rights; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 78 Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(d) report to the Agency on aspects relating to the provision of sufficient guarantees by the host Member State to ensure the protection of fundamental rights throughout the joint operation or rapid border intervention; |
(d) observe and promote the application of existing and future Union measures relating to the management of external borders and respect for fundamental rights in border management activities, report to the Agency on aspects relating to the provision of sufficient guarantees by the host Member State to ensure the protection of fundamental rights throughout the joint operation or rapid border intervention, and report to the Agency on aspects relating to the provision of sufficient guarantees by the host Member State to ensure the protection of fundamental rights throughout the joint operation or rapid border intervention; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 79 Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Detailed rules concerning the payment of the daily subsistence allowance of members of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams shall be established and updated as necessary by the Management Board. |
2. Detailed rules concerning the payment of the daily subsistence allowance of members of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams shall be established and updated as necessary by the Management Board on a proposal from the Commission. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 80 Proposal for a regulation Article 24 - Title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 81 Proposal for a regulation Article 24 - paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 82 Proposal for a regulation Article 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 83 Proposal for a regulation Article 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 84 Proposal for a regulation Article 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 85 Proposal for a regulation Article 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 86 Proposal for a regulation Article 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 87 Proposal for a regulation Article 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 88 Proposal for a regulation Article 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 89 Proposal for a regulation Article 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 90 Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 91 Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 92 Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 93 Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 94 Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. The Agency shall take the necessary initiatives to ensure training for staff involved in return-related tasks to be part of the pools referred to in Articles 28, 29 and 30. The Agency shall ensure that all staff who participate in return operations and in return interventions, as well as the staff of the Agency, have received, prior to their participation in operational activities organised by the Agency, training in relevant Union and international law, including fundamental rights and access to international protection. |
3. The Agency shall take the necessary initiatives to ensure training for staff involved in return-related tasks to be part of the pools referred to in Articles 28, 29 and 30. The Agency shall ensure that all staff who participate in return operations and in return interventions, as well as the staff of the Agency, have received, prior to their participation in operational activities organised by the Agency, training in relevant Union and international law, including fundamental rights, access to international protection and access to referral mechanisms for vulnerable persons. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 95 Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 96 Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 97 Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 98 Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 99 Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 3 – introductory part | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 100 Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 101 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 102 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 103 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 104 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 105 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 106 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 107 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 108 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 109 Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 110 Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 111 Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 112 Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 113 Proposal for a regulation Article 41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 114 Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 115 Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 116 Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 117 Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 118 Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 119 Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 120 Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3a. Processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person's sex life or sexual orientation shall be allowed only where strictly necessary, subject to appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of the data subject, and only to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 121 Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 122 Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 123 Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 124 Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 125 Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 126 Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 127 Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 128 Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 129 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 130 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 131 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 132 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 133 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 8 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 134 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 135 Proposal for a regulation Article 54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 136 Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 137 Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 138 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 139 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 140 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 141 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 142 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 143 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point p | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 144 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 145 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 146 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 147 Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, the Management Board shall be composed of one representative of each Member State and two representatives of the Commission, all with voting rights. To this effect, each Member State shall appoint a member of the Management Board as well as an alternate who will represent the member in his or her absence. The Commission shall appoint two members and their alternates. The duration of the terms of office shall be four years. The terms of office shall be extendable. |
1. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, the Management Board shall be composed of one representative of each Member State, two representatives of the Commission and one representative of the European Parliament, all with voting rights. To this effect, each Member State shall appoint a member of the Management Board as well as an alternate who will represent the member in his or her absence. The Commission shall appoint two members and their alternates. The European Parliament shall appoint one member and his or her alternate. The duration of the terms of office shall be four years. The terms of office shall be extendable. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the European Commission on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012 clearly states that where appropriate one member of the management board should be designated by the European Parliament. Given the important role of this agency, and given that this principle has been applied recently for instance with regards to the European Union Intellectual Property Office it would be reasonable to apply this principle also for this agency. The inclusion of a member of the management board designated by the European Parliament would also increase transparency with regards to the proceedings of the board. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 148 Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 149 Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 150 Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 151 Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 152 Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 153 Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. The Management Board may invite a representative of the European External Action Service. |
5. The Management Board may invite a representative of the European External Action Service or of any other body, agency or institution of the Union. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 154 Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 155 Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 156 Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 157 Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point k | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 158 Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point l | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 159 Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 160 Proposal for a regulation Article 68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 161 Proposal for a regulation Article 69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 162 Proposal for a regulation Article 70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 163 Proposal for a regulation Article 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 164 Proposal for a regulation Article 72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 165 Proposal for a regulation Article 74 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 166 Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – introductory part | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 167 Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 168 Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 169 Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 170 Proposal for a regulation Article 77 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 171 Proposal for a regulation Article 79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 172 Proposal for a regulation Article 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 173 Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Introduction
The Schengen area as an area of 26 countries without internal border control in which persons may move freely is rightly by many considered as among the biggest and most visible achievements of European integration. Its very idea - the absence of controls at internal borders - is however currently challenged in an unprecedented way: eight Schengen states (Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Austria, Slovenia, Sweden and Norway) have reintroduced border controls at internal borders as reaction to secondary movements of irregular migrants considered as serious threat to internal security and public policy. In addition, Malta and France have reintroduced internal border control for security considerations.
This shows that the tools and mechanisms which have been developed over time for the effective functioning of the Schengen area are not sufficient given the magnitude of the current migration crisis as well the threats posed by terrorist activities.
Work is on-going to address the challenges caused by the migration crisis, to encourage greater solidarity among Member States and to strengthen the exchange of information and cooperation of law enforcement authorities in the fight against terrorism.
The proposal for a European Border and Coast Guard (EBCG) addresses the need to ensure the proper control of the Schengen external border as a precondition to manage migration effectively, to ensure high level of security within while safeguarding free movement of persons within the Union. It is thus in the current context a key element to address the weaknesses identified but not the universal remedy.
Background
The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the EU (known as Frontex) started operations on 1 May 2005. The underlying idea of Frontex was to improve the integrated management of the external borders and the implementation of the common rules to promote, coordinate and develop the concept of European border management.
The mandate of Frontex was already revised two times. Regulation 863/2007 introduced the concept of rapid border interventions and Regulation 1168/2011 highlighted the responsibility of Frontex as regards the protection of fundamental rights.
In 2013 Regulation 1052/2013 furthermore established the European Border Surveillance System (Eurosur) which is managed by Frontex and can be described as a map of the situational picture at the border which serves to exchange information. In addition, following a court case brought by Parliament, Regulation 656/2014 established rules for the surveillance of the external sea borders in the context of sea operations coordinated by Frontex.
At the time of the adoption of the latest review of the Frontex Regulation in 2011 the Commission committed in a declaration to launch a feasibility study regarding the creation of a European system of border guards.[1] Also the European Council in the Stockholm Programme invited the Commission "to initiate a debate on the long-term development of Frontex" [including] [...] the feasibility of the creation of a European system of border guards". This study has been prepared and presented to the LIBE Committee.[2]
In parallel, Frontex underwent an evaluation which was foreseen in its legal basis the result of which has been published.[3] In its Agenda on Migration the Commission announced that "on the basis of the ongoing evaluation [...], the Commission will propose to amend the Frontex legal basis to strengthen its role on return."
Parliament has been discussing the future development of Frontex on many occasions, including during a debate in plenary held on 11 February 2015 and while preparing its resolution of 2 December 2015 on the Special Report of the European Ombudsman in own-initiative inquiry OI/5/2012/BEH-MHZ concerning Frontex (2014/2215(INI)). In this resolution it recommended the inclusion of provisions on an individual complaints mechanism when the Frontex mandate would be reviewed.
This proposal on a EBCG
On the basis of the above mentioned preparatory work and faced with an unprecedented migration crisis the Commission presented last December this proposal. It foresees a complete revision of the Frontex mandate by significantly enhancing its competences.
The Commission proposes the creation of the concept of the EBCG which would be composed of the new EBCG Agency, replacing Frontex, and the national Member State authorities which are responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks. The Commission also proposes to include the concept of European integrated border management for the first time in legislation.
Among the innovative elements of the proposal are the establishment of a vulnerability assessment as a preventive mechanism to avoid ineffective control of the external border, the deployment of liaison officers to Member States, the procedure for situations at the border requiring urgent action and the setting up of a pool of 1500 border guards which would have to be made available by Member States for rapid deployment without exception. The proposal also foresees a much stronger role of the Agency in the field of return, the strengthening of its capacity (staff, budget, equipment), increased cooperation with third countries, the establishment of a European cooperation on coast guard functions.
Position of the Rapporteur
The rapporteur welcomes and supports the proposal as a further element which, once adopted, will enhance solidarity between the Member States, reinforce integration regarding border management and contribute to preventing crisis situations at the external border. The proposal is a response to the weaknesses identified be they the unwillingness or inability of Member States to make border guards and equipment available for deployment by the Agency when so requested, the lack of an effective monitoring and preventive measures, or the fact that mechanisms created were not activated by Member States (there were only two rapid border interventions since the mechanism was established). In an area of free movement without internal borders, managing the Union's external borders must be a shared responsibility among all Member States. The amendments proposed by the rapporteur aim to further strengthen the proposal by increasing the Agency's effectiveness, as well as its efficiency and accountability.
The rapporteur proposes a number of amendments which should enable the Agency to better achieve its objectives. It is crucial that the Agency in the future has the necessary border guards and equipment at its disposal whenever this is needed and especially that it is able to deploy them within a short timeframe when necessary.
As regards the proposed procedure for situations at the border requiring urgent action (Article 18) the rapporteur considers that the proposal respects Member States' sovereignty as it also foresees that the Member State concerned has to agree with the Agency on the operational plan and is also the one who has to issue instructions to the teams. The rapporteur, however, believes that decisions to act should be taken by the Council to strengthen the decision making process and further emphasise the sovereignty of the Member States. There also has to be a realistic procedure for action in case a Member States does not follow a decision of Council. In such cases it is no option to wait for the outcome of a court procedure. Instead, as a last resort in certain well described circumstances reintroducing control at certain internal borders might be necessary in order to protect the Schengen area as such.
The rapporteur also considers that deploying liaison officers to all Member States with an external land or sea border will enable the Agency to better achieve its objectives and facilitate information exchange between the Member State and the Agency. In principle liaison officers should be deployed to all Member States as all Member States should participate in the further building-up of a common culture of high standards regarding border management. In recognition of the fact that Member States with only air borders are exposed to less risk, liaison officers do not necessarily have to be deployed to these Member States.
The external borders will be constantly monitored with periodic risk analyses and mandatory vulnerability assessments to identify and address the weakness at the external borders. The rapporteur proposes to strengthen the provisions regarding the equipment for operations. A rapid reaction pool of border guards and a technical equipment pool will be at the disposal of the Agency aiming at their deployment in rapid border interventions within days.
Given the increased role of the Agency in returns, the rapporteur clarifies that in this regard the objective of the agency is to assist the Member States with practical organisation of the return operations, without entering into the merits of return decisions issued by the Member States. Furthermore, given the stronger role and enhanced operational tasks of the Agency the rapporteur supports the establishment of a number of fundamental rights safeguards for the Agency.
The rapporteur also considers that the Regulation should be "future proof". With the focus currently being on contributing to the effective management of migration at the external borders of the Union, its role involves addressing potential threats at the Union's external borders, including crime with cross- border dimension.
As regards efficiency, the rapporteur proposes to delete the concept of the supervisory board and the multiannual programming exercise as both bear the inherent risk of being an obstacle to efficient action. Also the rapporteur considers that instead of operating through grants the Agency should use contracts when financing or co-financing activities. Grant schemes lack flexibility and are lengthy while contractual relation could be more efficient.
The rapporteur also considers necessary to increase the accountability of the future Agency by providing for more information to be made available to Parliament and the general public. More transparency is necessary to increase legitimacy and to avoid false impressions as to the role of the Agency.
Finally, the rapporteur subscribes to the view that adopting this Regulation is urgent in order to strengthen the control of the external border and thus return to a situation without border controls within the Schengen area.
- [1] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-344
- [2] http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/border-crossing/docs/20141016_home_esbg_frp_001_esbg_final_report_3_00_en.pdf
- [3] http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/General/Final_Report_on_External_Evaluation_of_Frontex.pdf
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (17.5.2016)
for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC
(COM(2015)0671 – C8‑0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD))
Rapporteur: Javier Nart
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard has as the objective the setting up of a European Border and Coast Guard, to ensure an integrated management of the EU's external border.
The proposal is welcomed and corresponds to the challenges the European Union has faced in the on-going refugee and migration crisis. It is estimated that only between January and November 2015, approximately 1,5 million persons have crossed the borders illegally.
Article 77 TFEU sets out an objective of a 'gradual introduction of an integrated management system for external borders' and this proposal should be adopted as a first and important step in that direction.
However, the proposed European Border and Coast Guard Agency will be based on the current Frontex and have to rely on the cooperation and contributions from the Member States in carrying out the practical work.
The regulation needs further amendments as to clarify the concept of 'shared responsibilities' between the Member States and the EU Border and Coast Guard Agency.
While the added competences constitute a significant step forward, it is necessary to see these steps as the first in a process towards a fully independent, integrated and EU-led and EU-wide Border and Coast Guard, financed from the EU budget and with operational autonomy. The final adoption of this regulation should be accompanied by a clear political commitment from the Member States and all EU institutions to such a development.
It is worth noting the stipulations contained in Article 18 of the proposed regulation, which will allow for an independent intervention decided by the Commission, even against the will of a Member State.
It is imperative that the Agency establish good relations with Border and Coast Guards in third countries and that the Agency has the operational independence and capability for such external links.
The assessment of the budgetary impact foresees at least € 31,5 million in 2017, but this sum, along with a preliminary estimation of staffing seems to be somewhat low.
Among the amendments proposed by the Foreign Affairs committee are also clarifications on the role of the European Parliament to scrutinize the Agency and on the Agency's cooperation with third countries.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(6 a) The European Border and Coast Guard is intended to replace Frontex in order to ensure a European integrated border management at the external borders with a view to managing migration effectively and ensuring a high level of internal security within the Union, while safeguarding the free movement of persons therein. In accordance with the Treaties and their Protocols, the Member States to which provisions of the Schengen acquis on lifting border controls are yet to apply should be able to participate in and/or benefit from all the actions under this Regulation. |
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(9) The tasks of Frontex should therefore be expanded and to reflect those changes, it should be renamed European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The key role of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be to establish an operational and technical strategy for the implementation of an integrated border management at Union level, to oversee the effective functioning of border control at the external borders, to provide increased operational and technical assistance to Member States through joint operations and rapid border interventions, and to ensure the practical execution of measures in case of a situation requiring urgent action at the external borders, as well as to organise, coordinate and conduct return operations and return interventions. |
(9) The tasks of Frontex should therefore be expanded and to reflect those changes, it should be renamed European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The key role of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be to establish an operational and technical strategy for the implementation of an integrated border management at Union level, to oversee the effective functioning of border control at the external borders, to provide increased operational and technical assistance to Member States through joint operations and rapid border interventions, and to ensure the practical execution of measures in case of a situation requiring urgent action at the external borders, including search and rescue operations at sea, as well as to organise, coordinate and conduct return operations and return interventions. |
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(12) In a spirit of shared responsibility, the role of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be to regularly monitor the management of the external borders. The Agency should ensure proper and effective monitoring not only through risk analysis, information exchange and Eurosur, but also through presence of experts from its own staff in Member States. The Agency should therefore be able to deploy liaison officers to specific Member States for a period of time during which the liaison officer reports to the Executive Director. The report of the liaison officers should form part of the vulnerability assessment. |
(12) Undertaking a shared responsibility with the Member States, the role of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be to regularly monitor the management of the EU external borders. The Agency should ensure proper and effective monitoring not only through risk analysis, information exchange and Eurosur, but also through the presence of experts from its own staff on the ground, in full cooperation with Member States and respecting the rights of non-Schengen countries. The Agency should therefore be able to deploy liaison officers to specific Member States for a period of time during which the liaison officer reports to the Executive Director. The report of the liaison officers should form part of the vulnerability assessment. |
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(14) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should organise the appropriate technical and operational assistance to Member States so as to reinforce their capacity to implement their obligations with regard to the control of the external borders, and to face challenges at the external border resulting from irregular immigration or cross-border crime. In this respect, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, organise and coordinate joint operations for one or more Member States and deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams as well as the necessary technical equipment, and it may deploy experts from its own staff. |
(14) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should organise and offer appropriate additional technical and operational assistance to Member States so as to reinforce their capacity to implement their obligations with regard to the control of the external borders and to face challenges at the external border, including through search and rescue operations at sea, without prejudice to the responsible national authorities' competence to initiate criminal investigations. In this respect, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, organise and coordinate joint operations for one or more Member States and deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams as well as the necessary technical equipment, and it may deploy experts from its own staff. |
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(16) At particular areas of the external borders where Member States face disproportionate migratory pressures characterised by large influxes of mixed migratory flows, referred to as hotspot areas, the Member States should be able to rely on the increased operational and technical reinforcement by the migration management support teams composed of teams of experts deployed from Member States by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and the European Asylum Support Office, and from Europol or other relevant Union Agencies, as well as experts from the staff of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should assist the Commission in the coordination among the different agencies on the ground. |
(16) At particular areas of the external borders where Member States face disproportionate migratory pressures characterised by large influxes of mixed migratory flows, referred to as hotspot areas, the Member States should be able to rely on the increased operational and technical reinforcement by the migration management support teams composed of teams of experts deployed from Member States by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and the European Asylum Support Office, and from Europol or other relevant Union Agencies, as well as experts from the staff of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should assist the Commission in the coordination among the different agencies on the ground. The Agency should have an autonomous right to intervene so that it may deploy its agents and equipment based on the complexity of a border protection situation and the specificities of the external border areas where Member States face disproportionate migration pressures. |
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(18) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should have the necessary equipment and staff at its disposal to be deployed in joint operations or rapid border interventions. To this end, when launching rapid border interventions at the request of a Member State or in the context of a situation requiring urgent action, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be able to deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams from a rapid reserve pool which should be a standing corps composed of a small percentage of the total number of border guards in the Member States, which should amount to a minimum of 1 500. The deployment of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams from the rapid reserve pool should be immediately complemented by additional European Border and Coast Guard Teams as appropriate. |
(18) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should have the necessary equipment and staff at its disposal to be deployed in joint operations or rapid border interventions. To this end, when launching rapid border interventions at the request of a Member State or in the context of a situation requiring urgent action, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be able to deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams from a rapid reserve pool which should be a standing corps composed of an appropriate percentage of the total number of border guards in the Member States, which should amount to a minimum of 1 500. The deployment of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams from the rapid reserve pool should be immediately complemented by additional European Border and Coast Guard Teams as appropriate. |
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(21) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should step up its assistance to Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, subject to the Union return policy and in compliance with Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1. In particular, it should coordinate and organise return operations from one or more Member States and it should organise and conduct return interventions to reinforce the return system of Member States requiring increased technical and operational assistance when complying with their obligation to return illegally staying third-country nationals in accordance with that Directive. |
(21) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should step up its assistance to Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, subject to the Union return policy and in compliance with Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 1. In particular, following the request of one or more Member States it should coordinate and organise return operations and it should organise and conduct return interventions to reinforce the return system of Member States requiring increased technical and operational assistance when complying with their obligation to return illegally staying third-country nationals in accordance with that Directive. |
__________________ |
__________________ |
1 Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in member states for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ L 348, 21.12.2008, p. 98). |
1 Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in member states for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ L 348, 21.12.2008, p. 98). |
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(28) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should facilitate and encourage operational cooperation between Member States and third countries in the framework of the external relations policy of the Union, including by coordinating operational cooperation between Member States and third countries in the field of management of external borders and by deploying liaison officers to third countries, as well as by cooperating with the authorities of third countries on return, including as regards the acquisition of travel documents. In their cooperation with third countries, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and Member States should comply with norms and standards at least equivalent to those set by Union legislation also when the cooperation with third countries takes place on the territory of those countries. |
(28) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency, in agreement with the Member State(s) concerned, should facilitate and encourage operational cooperation between Member States and third countries in the framework of the external relations policy of the Union in cooperation with the Commission and EEAS, including by coordinating operational cooperation between Member States and third countries after risk assessment of the external borders and by deploying liaison officers to third countries, as well as by cooperating with the authorities of third countries on return, including as regards the acquisition of travel documents. In their cooperation with third countries, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and Member States should comply with norms and standards at least equivalent to those set by Union legislation also when the cooperation with third countries takes place on the territory of those countries. |
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(29 a) During operations carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard, no person shall, in contravention of the principle of non-refoulement, be conducted to or otherwise handed over to the authorities of a third country where, inter alia, there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture, persecution or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, or where his or her life or freedom would be threatened on account of his or her race, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, or from which there is a serious risk of an expulsion, removal or extradition to another country in contravention of the principle of non-refoulement. |
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(30) This Regulation establishes a complaint mechanism for the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, in cooperation with the Fundamental Rights Officer, to monitor and ensure the respect for fundamental rights in all the activities of the Agency. This should be an administrative mechanism whereby the Fundamental Rights Officer should be responsible for handling complaints received by the Agency in accordance with the right to good administration. The Fundamental Rights Officer should review the admissibility of a complaint, register admissible complaints, forward all registered complaints to the Executive Director, forward complaints concerning border guards to the home Member State and register the follow-up by the Agency or that Member State. Criminal investigations should be conducted by the Member States. |
(30) This Regulation establishes a complaint mechanism for the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, in cooperation with the Fundamental Rights Officer, to monitor and ensure the respect for fundamental rights in all the activities of the Agency and its staff. This should be an effective and accessible administrative mechanism whereby the Agency's Fundamental Rights Officer participates in accordance with the right to good administration and is operationally independent. The Fundamental Rights Officer should review the admissibility of a complaint, register and deal accordingly with all admissible complaints, forward all registered complaints to the Executive Director, forward complaints concerning border and coast guards to the home Member State and register the follow-up by the Agency or that Member State. This data should be included in the annual report of the Agency. Criminal investigations should be conducted by the Member States. |
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(31) In order to ensure the uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, in particular as regards situations requiring urgent action at the external borders, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.18 |
(31) In order to ensure the uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, in particular as regards situations requiring urgent action at the external borders, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council18 and so as to respect the principle of non-refoulement and human right declarations and standards. |
__________________ |
__________________ |
18 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13). |
18 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13). |
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(33) The Commission and the Member States should be represented within a Management Board to exercise policy and political oversight over the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The Board should, where possible, consist of the operational heads of the national services responsible for border guard management or their representatives. This Board should be entrusted with the necessary powers to establish the budget, verify its execution, adopt the appropriate financial rules, establish transparent working procedures for decision making by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and appoint the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director. The Agency should be governed and operated in line with the principles of the common approach on Union decentralised agencies adopted on 19 July 2012 by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission. |
(33) The Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament should be represented within a Management Board to exercise policy and political oversight over the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The Board should, where possible, consist of the operational heads of the national services responsible for border guard management or their representatives. This Board should be entrusted with the necessary powers to establish the budget, verify its execution, adopt the appropriate financial rules, establish transparent working procedures for decision making by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and appoint the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director. The Agency should be governed and operated in line with the principles of the common approach on Union decentralised agencies adopted on 19 July 2012 by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission. |
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(1) ‘external borders’ means the land and sea borders of the Member States and their airports and seaports, to which the provisions of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council1 apply; |
(1) ‘external borders’ means the land and sea borders of the Member States and their airports and maritime ports, to which the provisions of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council 1 apply, including those Member States to which provisions of the Schengen acquis on lifting internal borders are yet to apply; |
______________ |
_______________ |
1 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1). |
1 Regulation (EC) No 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1). |
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall establish an operational and technical strategy for the European integrated border management. It shall promote and ensure the implementation of European integrated border management in all Member States. |
2. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall establish an operational and technical strategy for the European integrated border management, with clear objectives and measurable targets for improved border security and management and taking into account, where justified, the specific situation of the Member States, in particular their geographical location. This strategy shall be regularly updated in order to take into account new developments on the ground. It shall promote and ensure the implementation of European integrated border management in all Member States. |
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(a a) conduct and coordination of search and rescue operations at sea and support to civil society organisations and initiatives conducting search and rescue operations at sea; |
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(b) analysis of the risks for internal security and analysis of the threats that may affect the functioning or security of the external borders; |
(b) analysis of the risks for internal security and analysis of the threats that may affect the functioning or security of the external borders; |
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(d) cooperation with third countries in the areas of covered by this Regulation, focusing in particular on neighbouring countries and on those third countries which have been identified through risk analysis as being countries of origin and transit for irregular immigration; |
(d) cooperation with third countries in the areas of covered by this Regulation, focusing in particular on neighbouring countries and on those third countries which have been identified through risk analysis as being countries of origin and transit for irregular immigration in cooperation with the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States; |
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
1 a. Those Member States whose borders constitute the external borders shall ensure the management of the external borders, in their interests and in the interest of all Member States, in full compliance with Union law and in line with the technical and operational strategy referred to in Article 3(2), and in close cooperation with the Agency. |
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall facilitate the application of Union measures relating to the management of external borders by reinforcing, assessing and coordinating the actions of Member States in the implementation of those measures, and in return, Member States shall ensure the management of their section of the external borders, in their interests and in interest of all Member States which have abolished internal border control, in full compliance with Union law and in accordance with the technical and operational strategy referred to in Article 3(2), and in close cooperation with the Agency. |
2. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall facilitate the application of Union measures relating to the management of the external borders by reinforcing, assessing and coordinating the actions of Member States in the implementation of those measures, and in return, Member States shall ensure the management of their section of the external borders, in their interests and in interest of all Member States which have abolished internal border control, in full compliance with Union law and in accordance with the technical and operational strategy referred to in Article 3(2), and in close cooperation with the Agency. |
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
3 a. Member States hold primary responsibility for the implementation of the relevant international, Union and national legislation and law enforcement actions undertaken in the context of joint operations coordinated by the European Border and Coast Guard and therefore also for the respect of fundamental rights during these activities. The European Border and Coast Guard is also responsible, as the coordinator, and remains fully accountable for all actions and decisions under its mandate. The Commission, in cooperation with the Agency, the Council and relevant stakeholders, shall further analyse provisions related to accountability and liability and redress any potential or actual gaps connected to activities of the Agency. |
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. To ensure a coherent European integrated border management at all external borders, the Agency shall facilitate and render more effective the application of existing and future Union measures relating to the management of external borders, in particular the Schengen Borders Code established by Regulation (EC) No 562/2006. |
1. To ensure a coherent European integrated border management at all external borders, the Agency shall facilitate and render more effective the application of existing and future Union measures relating to the management of external borders, including the Schengen Borders Code established by Regulation (EU) No 2016/399. |
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. In view of contributing to an efficient, high and uniform level of border control and return, the Agency shall perform the following tasks: |
1. In view of contributing to an efficient, high and uniform level of border control and uniform application of international standards for returns, the Agency shall perform the following tasks: |
Amendment 23 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(a) establish a monitoring and risk analysis centre and analyse risks with the capacity to monitor migratory flows and to carry out risk analysis as regards all aspects of integrated border management; |
(a) monitor migratory flows and carry out risk analysis as regards all aspects of integrated border management by making use of available resources such as the Union satellite centre and situation centre; |
Amendment 24 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(b) carry out a vulnerability assessment including the assessment of the capacity of Member States to face threats and pressures at the external borders; |
(b) carry out regular vulnerability assessment including the assessment of the capacity of Member States to face threats and pressures at their external borders; |
Amendment 25 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(c) assist to Member States in circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance at the external borders by coordinating and organising joint operations, taking into account that some situations may involve humanitarian emergencies and rescue at sea; |
(c) provide support to Member States in circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance at the external borders by coordinating and organising joint operations, taking into account that some situations may involve humanitarian emergencies and rescue at sea; |
Amendment 26 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point f | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(f) set up a technical equipment pool to be deployed in joint operations, rapid border interventions and in the framework of migration management support teams, as well as in return operations and return interventions; |
(f) set up a technical equipment pool to be deployed in joint operations, rapid border interventions, search and rescue operations, and in the framework of migration management support teams, as well as in return operations and return interventions; |
Amendment 27 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1– point h | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(h) support the development of technical standards for equipment, especially for tactical level command, control and communication as well as technical surveillance to ensure interoperability at Union and national level; |
(h) support the development of common technical standards for equipment, especially for tactical level command, control and communication as well as technical surveillance to ensure interoperability at Union and national level; |
Amendment 28 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point n | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(n) participate in the development and management of research and innovation activities relevant for the control and surveillance of external borders, including the use of advanced surveillance technology such as remotely piloted aircraft systems and develop pilot projects regarding matters covered by this Regulation; |
(n) monitor and participate in the development and management of research and innovation activities relevant for the control and surveillance of external borders, including the use of advanced surveillance technology such as remotely piloted aircraft systems and develop pilot projects regarding matters covered by this Regulation; |
Amendment 29 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point q | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(q) cooperate with the European Fisheries Control Agency and the European Maritime Safety Agency to support the national authorities carrying out coast guard functions by providing services, information, equipment and training, as well as by coordinating multipurpose operations; |
(q) cooperate with the European Fisheries Control Agency and the European Maritime Safety Agency to support the national authorities carrying out coast guard functions by providing services, information and, where necessary, equipment and training, as well as by coordinating multipurpose operations; |
Amendment 30 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point r | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(r) assist Member States and third countries in the context of operational cooperation between them in the fields of external border management and return. |
(r) assist and provide support to Member States and third countries in their cooperation in the fields of external border management and return. |
Amendment 31 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(r a) adopt and promote the highest standards for border management practices, allowing for transparency and public scrutiny and ensuring the respect and promotion of fundamental rights and rule of law. |
Amendment 32 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
Member States may continue cooperation at an operational level with other Member States and/or third countries at external borders, including military operations on a law enforcement mission and in the field of return, where such cooperation is compatible with the action of the Agency. Member States shall refrain from any activity which could jeopardise the functioning of the Agency or the attainment of its objectives. |
Member States may continue cooperation at an operational level with other Member States and/or third countries at external borders, including military operations on a law enforcement mission and in the field of return, where such cooperation does not contradict the action of the Agency and CSDP and NATO missions. Member States shall refrain from any activity which could jeopardise the functioning of the Agency or the attainment of its objectives. |
Amendment 33 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. The Agency shall establish a monitoring and risk analysis centre with the capacity to monitor migratory flows towards and within the Union. For this purpose, the Agency shall develop a common integrated risk analysis model, which shall be applied by the Agency and the Member States. |
1. The Agency shall establish a monitoring and risk analysis centre with the capacity to monitor migratory flows. It shall ensure that all already available Union resources (intelligence, risk analyses, satellite, etc.) are fully and comprehensively utilised. For this purpose, the Agency shall, by a decision of the Management Board, develop a common integrated risk analysis model, which shall be applied by the Agency and the Member States. |
Amendment 34 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. The risk analysis prepared by the Agency shall cover all aspects relevant to the European integrated border management, in particular border control, return, irregular secondary movements of third-country nationals within the Union, the prevention of cross-border crime including facilitation of irregular immigration, trafficking in human being and terrorism, as well as the situation in neighbouring third countries with a view to developing a pre-warning mechanism which analyses the migratory flows towards the Union. |
3. The risk analysis prepared by the Agency shall cover all aspects relevant to the European integrated border management, in particular border control, the protection of fundamental rights, return, irregular secondary movements of third-country nationals within the Union, the prevention of cross-border crime, trafficking in human being and terrorism, as well as the situation in neighbouring third countries and countries of origin and transit for irregular migration with a view to developing a pre-warning mechanism which analyses the migratory flows towards the Union and the respect for fundamental rights in the countries they come from. |
Amendment 35 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
3 a. The Agency shall make its methodology and criteria for the risk analysis public. |
Amendment 36 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point e | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(e) report regularly to the Executive Director on the situation at the external border and the capacity of the Member State concerned to deal effectively with the situation at the external borders; |
(e) report regularly to the Executive Director and to the head of the relevant national authority on the situation at the external border and the capacity of the Member State concerned to deal effectively with the situation; |
Amendment 37 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 – point a | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(a) have unlimited access to the national coordination centre and the national situational picture established in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1052/2013; |
(a) have access to the national coordination centre and the national situational picture established in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1052/2013 |
Amendment 38 Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
4. The results of the vulnerability assessment shall be submitted to the Supervisory Board, which shall advise the Executive Director on the measures to be taken by the Member States based on the results of the vulnerability assessment, and taking into account the Agency’s risk analysis and the results of the Schengen evaluation mechanism. |
4. The results of the vulnerability assessment shall be submitted to the Member States concerned. The Member State concerned may comment on the assessment. The Executive Director shall base the measures to be recommended to the the Member States concerned on the results of the vulnerability assessment, taking into account the Agency’s risk analysis, the comments of the Member State concerned and the results of the Schengen evaluation mechanism. |
Amendment 39 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(a a) exchange information on migration flows with civil society organisations and initiatives conducting search and rescue operations; |
Amendment 40 Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – title | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
Initiating joint operations and rapid border interventions at the external borders |
Initiating joint operations and rapid border interventions at the external borders |
Amendment 41 Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
5. The objectives of a joint operation or rapid border intervention may be achieved as part of a multipurpose operation which may involve the rescue of persons in distress at sea or other coast guard functions, the fight against migrant smuggling or trafficking in human beings, drug trafficking control operations, and migration management including identification, registration, debriefing and return. |
5. The objectives of a joint operation or rapid border intervention may be achieved as part of a multipurpose operation which may involve the rescue of persons in distress at sea or other coast guard functions , the fight against migrant smuggling or trafficking in human beings, drug trafficking control operations, and migration management including identification, registration, debriefing and return. Any operation involving coast guard functions shall be conducted in a way that, in all instances, ensures the safety of the persons intercepted or rescued, the safety of the participating units and that of third parties. |
Amendment 42 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. In preparation of a joint operation the Executive Director, in cooperation with the host Member State, shall draw up a list of technical equipment and staff needed taking into account the host Member State’s available resources. On the basis of those elements, the Agency shall define a package of operational and technical reinforcement as well as capacity building activities to be included in the operational plan. |
1. In preparation of a joint operation the Executive Director, in cooperation with the host Member State or third country, shall draw up a list of technical equipment and staff needed taking into account the host Member State’s available resources. On the basis of those elements, the Agency shall define a package of operational and technical reinforcement as well as capacity building activities to be included in the operational plan. |
Amendment 43 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point f | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(f) command and control provisions, including the names and ranks of the border guards of the host Member State responsible for cooperating with the members of the teams and the Agency, in particular the names and ranks of those border guards who are in command during the period of deployment, and the place of the members of the teams in the chain of command; |
(f) command and control provisions, including the names and ranks of the border guards of the host Member State responsible for cooperating with the members of the teams and the Agency, in particular the names and ranks of those border and coast guards who are in command during the period of deployment, and the place of the members of the teams in the chain of command; |
Amendment 44 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point j | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(j) regarding sea operations, specific information on the application of the relevant jurisdiction and legislation in the geographical area where the joint operation takes place, including references to international and Union law regarding interception, rescue at sea and disembarkation. In that regard the operational plan shall be established in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council;42 |
(j) regarding sea operations, specific information on the application of the relevant jurisdiction and legislation in the geographical area where the joint operation takes place, including references to international and Union law regarding interception, search, rescue at sea and disembarkation. In that regard the operational plan defining the role of the Agency in search and rescue activities shall be established in accordance with international law and Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council;42 |
__________________ |
__________________ |
42 Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing rules for the surveillance of the external sea borders in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Members States of the European Union (OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 93). |
42 Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing rules for the surveillance of the external sea borders in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Members States of the European Union (OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 93). |
Amendment 45 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point k | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(k) modalities of cooperation with third countries, other Union agencies, bodies and offices or international organisations; |
(k) modalities of cooperation with third countries, other Union agencies, bodies and offices or international organisations in close synergy with the Commission and EEAS. The European Parliament shall be regularly informed about this cooperation; |
Amendment 46 Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point c | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(c) technical and operational assistance in the field of return, including the preparation and organisation of return operations. |
(c) technical and operational assistance in the field of return, including the preparation and organisation of return operations in full respect of fundamental rights, due process and the principle of non-refoulement. |
Amendment 47 Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
3a. The Agency in cooperation with the European Asylum Support Office, the Fundamental Rights Agency and other relevant Union Agencies and under the coordination of the Commission shall ensure the compliance of these activities with the Common European Asylum System and fundamental rights. This includes the provision of shelter, hygienic conditions and facilities respecting gender based and children's needs in the hotspot areas. |
Amendment 48 Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
5. The rapid reserve pool shall be a standing corps placed at the immediate disposal of the Agency and which can be deployed from each Member State within three working days from when the operational plan is agreed upon by the Executive Director and the host Member State. For that purpose, each Member State shall, on a yearly basis, make available to the Agency a number of border guards commensurate to at least 3% of the staff of Member States without land or sea external borders and 2% of the staff of Member States with land or sea external borders, and which shall amount to a minimum of 1 500 border guards, corresponding to the profiles identified by the decision of the Management Board. |
5. The rapid reserve pool shall be a standing corps placed at the immediate disposal of the Agency and which can be deployed from each Member State within three working days from when the operational plan is agreed upon by the Executive Director and the host Member State. For that purpose, each Member State shall, on a yearly basis, make available to the Agency a number of border guards commensurate to at least 3% of the staff of Member States without land or sea external borders and 2% of the staff of Member States with land or sea external borders, and which shall amount to a minimum of 1 500 border guards, corresponding to the profiles identified by the decision of the Management Board. The Agency shall draw on Union expertise developed through common security and defence policy missions and headline goals. |
Amendment 49 Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
The Agency shall contribute to the European Border and Coast Guard Teams with competent border guards seconded by the Member States as national experts to the Agency. The contribution by Member States as regards the secondment of their border guards to the Agency for the following year shall be planned on the basis of annual bilateral negotiations and agreements between the Agency and Member States. In accordance with those agreements, Member States shall make the border guards available for secondment, unless that would seriously affect the discharge of national tasks. In such situations Member States may recall their seconded border guards. |
The Agency shall contribute to the European Border and Coast Guard Teams with competent border guards seconded by the Member States as national experts to the Agency. The contribution by Member States as regards the secondment of their border guards to the Agency for the following year shall be planned on the basis of annual bilateral negotiations and agreements between the Agency and Member States. In accordance with those agreements, Member States shall make the border guards available for secondment, unless that would seriously affect the discharge of national tasks. In such situations Member States may recall their seconded border guards. In order to respond to eventual shortages, the Agency may employ staff on a temporary basis in order to perform border control function in line with its mandate. |
Amendment 50 Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
Such secondments may be for 12 months or more but in any case it shall not be less than three months. The seconded border guards shall be considered as members of the teams and they shall have the tasks and powers of the members of the teams. The Member State having seconded the border guards shall be considered as the home Member State. |
The secondments may be for 12 months or more but in any case it shall not be less than three months. The seconded border guards shall be considered as members of the teams and they shall have the tasks and powers of the members of the teams. The Member State having seconded the border guards shall be considered as the home Member State. |
Amendment 51 Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(a) coordinate at technical and operational level the return activities of the Member States, to achieve an integrated system of return management among competent authorities of the Member States, with the participation of relevant authorities of third countries and other relevant stakeholders; |
(a) coordinate at technical and operational level the return activities of the Member States, including voluntary returns, to achieve an integrated system of return management among competent authorities of the Member States, with the participation of relevant authorities of third countries and other relevant stakeholders; |
Amendment 52 Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(a a) cooperate with third countries in order to facilitate the return activities of the Member States; |
Amendment 53 Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point d | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(d) assistance on measures necessary to ensure the availability of returnees for return purposes and avoid that returnees abscond. |
(d) assistance on measures that are legitimate, proportionate and necessary to ensure the availability of returnees for return purposes and avoid that returnees abscond and advice on alternatives to immigration detention in line with Directive 2008/115/EC and international law. |
Amendment 54 Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. The Return Office shall aim at building synergies and connecting Union-funded networks and programmes in the field of return in close cooperation with the European Commission and the European Migration Network.43 |
3. The Return Office shall aim at building synergies and connecting Union-funded networks and programmes in close cooperation with the European Commission and the European Migration Network,43 as well as with other organisations and the Member States concerned. |
__________________ |
__________________ |
43 OJ L 131, 21.5.2008, p. 7. |
43 OJ L 131, 21.5.2008, p. 7. |
Amendment 55 Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
1 a. The Agency shall not coordinate, organise or propose return operations to any third country where risks of fundamental rights violations or serious deficiencies in relevant civil and criminal laws and procedures have been identified through its risk analyses, or established in reports from the Fundamental Rights Officer, Union agencies, human rights bodies, intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations. |
Amendment 56 Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. The European Border and Coast Guard shall guarantee the protection of fundamental rights in the performance of its tasks under this Regulation in accordance with relevant Union law, in particular the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, relevant international law, including the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and obligations related to access to international protection, in particular the principle of non-refoulement. For that purpose, the Agency shall draw up and further develop and implement a Fundamental Rights Strategy. |
1. The European Border and Coast Guard shall respect and guarantee the protection of fundamental rights in the performance of its tasks under this Regulation in accordance with relevant Union law, in particular the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and relevant international law, including the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and the Convention on the Rights of the Child and obligations related to access to international protection, in particular with regards to the principle of non-refoulement. For that purpose, the Agency in cooperation with European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights shall draw up and further develop and implement a Fundamental Rights Strategy, including effective mechanisms to ensure the respect for fundamental rights and rule of law in all the activities of the Agency. The European Parliament shall be duly informed of this Fundamental Rights Strategy; |
Amendment 57 Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. In the performance of its tasks the European Border and Coast Guard shall ensure that no person is disembarked in, forced to enter, conducted to or otherwise handed over or returned to the authorities of a country in contravention of the principle of non-refoulement, or from which there is a risk of expulsion or return to another country in contravention of that principle. |
2. In the performance of its tasks the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall ensure that no person is disembarked in, forced to enter, conducted to or otherwise handed over or returned to the authorities of a country in contravention of the principle of non-refoulement, or from which there is a risk of expulsion or return to another country in contravention of that principle. |
Amendment 58 Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. The European Border and Coast Guard shall, in the performance of its tasks, take into account the special needs of children, victims of trafficking in human beings, persons in need of medical assistance, persons in need of international protection, persons in distress at sea and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation. |
3. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall, in the performance of its tasks, take into account the special needs of minors, especially if unaccompanied, victims of trafficking in human beings, persons in need of medical assistance, persons in need of international protection, persons in distress at sea and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation. |
Amendment 59 Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 4 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
4. In the performance of its tasks, in its relations with Member States and in its cooperation with third countries, the Agency shall take into account the reports of the Consultative Forum and the Fundamental Rights Officer. |
4. In the performance of all its tasks, including the further development and implementation of an effective mechanism to monitor the respect for fundamental rights, in its relations with Member States and in its cooperation with third countries, the Agency shall ensure appropriate follow-up to the reports of the Consultative Forum and the Fundamental Rights Officer. The Agency shall inform the Consultative Forum and Fundamental Rights Officer whether and how it has altered its approach as a response to the reports and recommendations of these bodies and include details in its annual report. |
Amendment 60 Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. The Agency shall take the necessary initiatives to ensure training for staff involved in return-related tasks to be part of the pools referred to in Articles 28, 29 and 30. The Agency shall ensure that all staff who participate in return operations and in return interventions, as well as the staff of the Agency, have received, prior to their participation in operational activities organised by the Agency, training in relevant Union and international law, including fundamental rights and access to international protection. |
3. The Agency shall take the necessary initiatives to ensure training for staff involved in return-related tasks to be part of the pools referred to in Articles 28, 29 and 30. The Agency shall ensure that all staff who participate in return operations and in return interventions, as well as the staff of the Agency, have received, prior to their participation in operational activities organised by the Agency, training in relevant Union and international law, including fundamental rights, access to international protection, that will also enable them identify possible human rights violations and process them accordingly. |
Amendment 61 Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. Where such damage is caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct, the host Member State may approach the home Member State in order to have any sums it has paid to the victims or persons entitled on their behalf reimbursed by the home Member State. |
2. Where such damage is caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct, the Agency shall make good any damage caused in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States. |
Amendment 62 Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
4 a. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction in disputes relating to compensation for the damage referred to in paragraph 1 and 2. |
Amendment 63 Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 4 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
4. Without prejudice to Article 47, the transfer of personal data processed by the Agency and the onward transfer by Member States to authorities of third countries or third parties of personal data processed in the framework of this Regulation shall be prohibited. |
4. Without prejudice to Article 47, the transfer of personal data processed by the Agency and the onward transfer by Member States to authorities of third countries or international organisations or third parties of personal data processed in the framework of this Regulation shall be prohibited. |
Amendment 64 Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
The Agency shall cooperate with the Commission, other Union institutions, the European External Action Service, Europol, the European Asylum Support Office, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Eurojust, the European Union Satellite Centre, the European Maritime Safety Agency and the European Fisheries Control Agency as well as other Union, agencies, bodies, offices in matters covered by this Regulation, and in particular with the objectives of preventing and combating irregular immigration and cross-border crime including the facilitation of irregular immigration, trafficking in human being and terrorism. |
The Agency shall cooperate with the European Parliament, the Commission and other Union institutions, the European External Action Service, Europol, the European Asylum Support Office, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Eurojust, the European Union Satellite Centre, the European Maritime Safety Agency and the European Fisheries Control Agency as well as other Union, agencies, bodies, offices in matters covered by this Regulation, and in particular with the objectives of preventing and combating irregular immigration and cross-border crime including the facilitation of irregular immigration, trafficking in human being and terrorism. |
Amendment 65 Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 – point c | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(c) capacity building by elaborating guidelines, recommendations and best practices as well as by supporting the training and exchange of staff, with a view to enhancing the exchange of information and cooperation on coast guard functions; |
(c) capacity building by elaborating guidelines, recommendations and best practices as well as by supporting the training and exchange of staff, with a view to enhancing the exchange of information and cooperation on coast guard functions, the search and rescue operational capability and the compliance with human rights, migration and asylum obligations and commitments. |
Amendment 66 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – title | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
Cooperation with third countries |
Cooperation with third countries and non -governmental organisations |
Amendment 67 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. In matters covered by its activities and to the extent required for the fulfilment of its tasks, the Agency shall facilitate and encourage operational cooperation between Member States and third countries, within the framework of the external relations policy of the Union, including with regard to the protection of fundamental rights. The Agency and the Member States shall comply with norms and standards at least equivalent to those set by Union legislation also when cooperation with third countries takes place on the territory of those countries. The establishment of cooperation with third countries shall serve to promote European border management and return standards. |
1. In matters covered by its activities and to the extent required for the fulfilment of its tasks, the Agency shall facilitate and encourage operational cooperation between Member States and third countries, within the framework of the external relations policy of the Union and especially of the European neighbourhood policy and development policy, including with regard to the protection of fundamental rights. The Agency and the Member States shall comply with norms and standards at least equivalent to those set by Union legislation also when cooperation with third countries takes place on the territory of those countries. The establishment of cooperation with third countries shall serve to promote European border management and return standards. |
Amendment 68 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. In circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance, the Agency may coordinate operational cooperation between Member States and third countries in the field of management of external borders, and it shall have the possibility of carrying out joint operations at the external borders involving one or more Member States and a third country neighbouring at least one of those Member States, subject to the agreement of that neighbouring third country, including on the territory of that third country. The Commission shall be informed of such activities. |
3. In circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance, the Agency may coordinate operational cooperation between Member States and third countries in the field of management of external borders, and it shall have the possibility of carrying out joint operations at the external borders involving one or more Member States and a third country neighbouring at least one of those Member States in full respect with international human rights law, subject to the agreement of that neighbouring third country, including on the territory of that third country. The participation of Member States in joint operations on the territory of third countries shall be on voluntary basis. The European Parliament, the Commission, the EEAS, , Eurojust and Europol shall be informed of such activities. |
Amendment 69 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
3 a. A status agreement shall be concluded by the EU with the third country for the deployment of the members of the teams in joint operations where members of the team will have executive powers, or in other actions when necessary. This agreement shall cover all aspects that are necessary for carrying out the actions, in particular the description of the scope of the operation, civil and criminal liability, tasks and powers of the members of the teams. The agreement shall ensure the full respect of fundamental rights during the operations. |
Amendment 70 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 b (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
3 b. The Commission shall draw up a model status agreement for actions on the territory of third countries. |
Amendment 71 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 5 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
5. The Agency may also, with the agreement of the Member States concerned invite observers from third countries to participate in its activities at the external borders referred to in Article 13, return operations referred to in Article 27, return interventions referred to in Article 32 and training referred to in Article 35, to the extent that their presence is in accordance with the objectives of those activities, may contribute to improving cooperation and the exchange of best practices, and does not affect the overall safety of those activities. The participation of those observers may take place only with the agreement of the Member States concerned regarding the activities referred to in Articles 13, 27 and 35 and only with the agreement of the host Member State regarding those referred to in Article 13 and 32. Detailed rules on the participation of observers shall be included in the operational plan. Those observers shall receive the appropriate training from the Agency prior to their participation. |
5. The Agency may also, with the agreement of the Member States concerned invite observers from third countries to participate in its activities at the external borders referred to in Article 13, return operations referred to in Article 27, return interventions referred to in Article 32 and training referred to in Article 35, to the extent that their presence is in accordance with the objectives of those activities, may contribute to improving cooperation and the exchange of best practices, and does not affect the overall safety of those activities or the security of the persons to be returned. The participation of those observers may take place only with the agreement of the Member States concerned regarding the activities referred to in Articles 13, 27 and 35 and only with the agreement of the host Member State regarding those referred to in Article 13 and 32. Detailed rules on the participation of observers shall be included in the operational plan. Those observers shall receive the appropriate training from the Agency prior to their participation. |
Amendment 72 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 8 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
8 a. Before any agreement referred to in this article is concluded, the Commission shall verify that its provisions comply with this Regulation as well as with the relevant Union and international law on fundamental rights and on international protection, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, in particular the principle of non-refoulement and the right to an effective remedy, and with the provisions on information exchange and data protection in this regulation. The assessment shall be based on information derived from a broad range of sources, which include Member States, Union bodies, offices and agencies, relevant international organisations and NGOs. The Commission shall forward its assessment to the European Parliament and the Council. |
Amendment 73 Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 9 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
9. The Agency shall inform the European Parliament of the activities referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3. |
9. The Agency shall publish its agreements and working arrangements with third countries on its website. The Agency shall report to the European Parliament at least every three months on its cooperation with third countries. A detailed assessment of the cooperation with third countries, including detailed information on compliance with fundamental rights and international protection, shall be included into the annual report of the Agency. |
Amendment 74 Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. The Agency may deploy experts of its own staff as liaison officers, who should enjoy the highest possible protection to carry out their duties, in third countries. They shall form part of the local or regional cooperation networks of immigration liaison officers and security experts of the Union and of the Member States, including the network set up pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 377/2004.49 |
1. The Agency may deploy experts of its own staff as liaison officers, who should enjoy the highest possible protection to carry out their duties, in third countries. They shall form part of the local or regional cooperation networks of immigration liaison officers and security experts of the Union and of the Member States. The Agency shall coordinate and ensure the proper functioning of the network set up pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 377/2004.49 |
__________________ |
__________________ |
49 Council Regulation (EC) No 377/2004 of 19 February 2004 on the creation of an immigration liaison officers network (OJ L 64, 2.3.2004, p. 1). |
49 Council Regulation (EC) No 377/2004 of 19 February 2004 on the creation of an immigration liaison officers network (OJ L 64, 2.3.2004, p. 1). |
Amendment 75 Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 6 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
6. The Management Board may establish a small-sized Executive Board composed of the Chairperson of the Management Board, one representative of the Commission and three members of the Management Board, to assist it and the Executive Director with regard to the preparation of the decisions, programmes and activities to be adopted by the Management Board and when necessary, because of urgency, to take certain provisional decisions on behalf of the Management Board. |
6. The Management Board may establish a small-sized Executive Board composed of the Chairperson of the Management Board, one representative of the Commission and three members of the Management Board as well as a representative of the Member State requiring assistance, to assist it and the Executive Director with regard to the preparation of the decisions, programmes and activities to be adopted by the Management Board and when necessary, because of urgency, to take certain provisional decisions on behalf of the Management Board. |
Amendment 76 Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, the Management Board shall be composed of one representative of each Member State and two representatives of the Commission, all with voting rights. To this effect, each Member State shall appoint a member of the Management Board as well as an alternate who will represent the member in his or her absence. The Commission shall appoint two members and their alternates. The duration of the terms of office shall be four years. The terms of office shall be extendable. |
1. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, the Management Board shall be composed of one representative of each Member State, two representatives of the Commission and two of the European Parliament, all with voting rights. To this effect, each Member State shall appoint a member of the Management Board as well as an alternate who will represent the member in his or her absence. The Commission shall appoint two members and their alternates. The European Parliament shall elect two of its Members, at least one being a Member of its Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee. The duration of the terms of office shall be four years. The terms of office shall be extendable. |
Amendment 77 Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. The Commission shall propose candidates for the post of the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director based on a list following publication of the post in the Official Journal of the European Union and other press or internet sites as appropriate. |
1. The Commission, after consulting the European Parliament, shall propose candidates for the post of the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director based on a list following publication of the post in the Official Journal of the European Union and other press or internet sites as appropriate. |
Amendment 78 Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. The, Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board on the grounds of merit and documented high-level administrative and management skills, as well as senior professional experience in the field of management of the external borders and return. The Management Board shall take its decision by a two-thirds majority of all members with a right to vote. |
2. Prior to his/her appointment by the Management Board on the grounds of merit and documented high-level administrative and management skills, as well as senior professional experience in the field of management of the external borders and return, the Executive Director shall be heard by the appropriate bodies of the European Parliament. The Management Board shall take its decision by a two-thirds majority of all members with a right to vote. |
Amendment 79 Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall be independent in the performance of his or her duties as a Fundamental Rights Officer, he or she shall report directly to the Management Board and cooperate with the Consultative Forum. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall report on a regular basis and as such contribute to the mechanism for monitoring fundamental rights. |
2. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall be fully independent in the performance of his or her duties as a Fundamental Rights Officer, he or she shall report directly to the Management Board and the European Parliament and cooperate with the Consultative Forum. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall report on a regular basis and as such contribute to the mechanism for monitoring fundamental rights. |
Amendment 80 Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a new | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
2a. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall hold regular exchange of views with the competent bodies of the European Parliament and report on complaints and their follow-up. |
Amendment 81 Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 5 – point a new | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
5a. The Executive Director shall report back to the Fundamental Rights Officer as to the findings and follow-up given by the Agency to a complaint. |
Amendment 82 Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 7 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
7. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall report to the Executive Director and to the Management Board as to the findings and follow-up given to complaints by the Agency and the Member States. |
7. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall inform the Executive Director and the Management Board of the findings regarding the complaints deemed eligible. The Executive Director and the Management Board shall then report on the follow-up to complaints by the Agency and the Member States. |
Amendment 83 Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 7 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
7 a. A report on received complaints, the types of fundamental rights violations, the activities of the Agency concerned, the Member State or third country concerned and the follow-up shall be included into the annual activity report of the Agency. |
Amendment 84 Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 9 – subparagrap 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
The Agency shall ensure that the standardized complaint form is available in most common languages and that it shall be made available on the Agency’s website and in hardcopy during all activities of the Agency. Complaints shall be considered by the Fundamental Rights Officer even when they are not submitted in the standardized complaint form. |
The Agency shall ensure that the standardized complaint form and information sheet are available in most common languages and those that asylum seekers and migrants understand or may be reasonably supposed to understand and that it shall be made available on the Agency’s website and in hardcopy during all activities of the Agency. Complaints shall be considered by the Fundamental Rights Officer even when they are not submitted in the standardized complaint form. Further guidance and assistance on the complaints procedure shall be provided to alleged victims upon request. Information tailored to children shall be provided to facilitate their access to the complaints mechanism. |
Amendment 85 Proposal for a regulation Article 74 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
Article 74 a |
|
Reports and information to the European Parliament |
|
1. The European Parliament or the Council may invite the Executive Director to report on the carrying out of his or her tasks, including on the implementation and monitoring of the Fundamental Rights Strategy, the consolidated annual activity report of the Agency for the previous year, the work programme for the following year and the Agency's multiannual programming. The Executive Director shall report to the European Parliament and answer any questions put by its members, whenever so requested. |
|
2. In addition to information referred to in paragraph 1 the report shall also include any relevant information requested by the European Parliament on an ad-hoc basis. |
Amendment 86 Proposal for a regulation Article 80 – paragraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. By three years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation to assess particularly the impact, effectiveness and efficiency of the Agency’s performance and its working practices in relation to its objectives, mandate and tasks. The evaluation shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify the mandate of the Agency, and the financial implications of any such modification. |
1. By one year from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, and every two years thereafter, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation to assess particularly the impact, effectiveness and efficiency of the Agency’s performance and its working practices in relation to its objectives, mandate and tasks. The evaluation shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify the regulation, the mandate of the Agency, and the financial implications of any such modification. |
The evaluation shall include a specific analysis on the way the Charter of Fundamental Rights was complied with in the application of this Regulation. |
The evaluation shall include a specific analysis of the way the Charter of Fundamental Rights was complied with in the application of this Regulation as well as of cases of complaints and their handling. |
Amendment 87 Proposal for a regulation Article 80 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
The first evaluation following the entry into force of this Regulation shall analyse the need for giving the Agency access to the relevant European databases. |
Amendment 88 Proposal for a regulation Article 80 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
2a. The Executive Director shall hold regular exchanges of views with the appropriate bodies of the European Parliament, notably regarding specific cooperation with third countries, and shall present the annual report of the Agency. |
Amendment 89 Proposal for a regulation Article 80 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. On the occasion of every second evaluation, the Commission shall assess the results achieved by the Agency having regard to its objectives, mandate and tasks. |
3. On the occasion of every evaluation, the Commission shall assess the results achieved by the Agency having regard to its objectives, mandate and tasks. |
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
European Border and Coast Guard |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0671 – C8-0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
LIBE 21.1.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
AFET 21.1.2016 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Javier Nart 16.2.2016 |
||||
Date adopted |
12.5.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
42 8 9 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Lars Adaktusson, Michèle Alliot-Marie, Francisco Assis, Petras Auštrevičius, Amjad Bashir, Bas Belder, Goffredo Maria Bettini, Mario Borghezio, Elmar Brok, Klaus Buchner, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Aymeric Chauprade, Javier Couso Permuy, Andi Cristea, Georgios Epitideios, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Eugen Freund, Michael Gahler, Iveta Grigule, Richard Howitt, Sandra Kalniete, Tunne Kelam, Afzal Khan, Janusz Korwin-Mikke, Andrey Kovatchev, Eduard Kukan, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Arne Lietz, Barbara Lochbihler, Andrejs Mamikins, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Javier Nart, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Demetris Papadakis, Vincent Peillon, Alojz Peterle, Tonino Picula, Kati Piri, Andrej Plenković, Cristian Dan Preda, Jozo Radoš, Sofia Sakorafa, Jaromír Štětina, Charles Tannock, László Tőkés, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Ivo Vajgl, Elena Valenciano, Geoffrey Van Orden, Hilde Vautmans, Boris Zala |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Ryszard Czarnecki, Mariya Gabriel, Andrzej Grzyb, András Gyürk, Soraya Post, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, Dubravka Šuica, Bodil Valero |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Michel Dantin, Raymond Finch, Heidi Hautala, Julie Ward, Bogdan Brunon Wenta |
||||
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets (26.4.2016)
for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC
(COM(2015)0671 – C8‑0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD))
Rapporteur: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The Commission proposed the present Regulation within a larger Border and Coast Guard package also comprising proposals to amend the founding regulations of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) and the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA). For these two agencies the Commission proposes to enlarge their functions through an additional article on European cooperation on coastguard functions whereas the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall be built from the existing Frontex.
From a budgetary perspective this attempt to create synergies between agencies working in related areas should be supported, also given the limited financial resources available in heading 3.
In its legislative financial statement the Commission is proposing an overall budget for the European Border and Coast Guard Agency of EUR 1.212 million for the remainder of this multiannual financial framework (MFF), concretely EUR 281 million in 2017, EUR 298 million in 2018, EUR 310 million in 2019 and EUR 322 million in 2020.
Given the limited resources available in heading 3 in the current MFF the Rapporteur has serious doubts that the envisaged increases can be financed within the ceiling. The Rapporteur is of the opinion that the Commission needs to present a proposal for an upward revision of the ceiling for heading 3 as soon as possible in order to be able to finance the additional needs linked to the current migration crisis which is unlikely to diminish by 2020.
The coastguard function will furthermore be reinforced by additional EUR 87,2 million for EMSA and EUR 30,1 million for EFCA for the years 2017-2020 to finance the new functions of these two agencies. The coastguard function will thus also be partially financed from headings 1a and 2.
In line with the additional appropriations, also the number of staff for the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall be increased significantly. Under the 2016 budget 225 establishment plan posts were authorised for Frontex. This number shall grow by 2020 to 550 establishment plan posts. In addition also the number of external personnel like contract agents and seconded national experts shall increase with the aim of reaching an overall staff number of 1000 by 2020.
It should be noted however that the Commission in its legislative financial statement still applies as a baseline its programming as set out in the communication COM (2013)519, thus gradually reducing the "old Frontex" posts (excluding the additional ones granted through Amending budgets 5/2015 and 7/2015 and budget 2016) from 149 in 2016 to 145 in 2020. The Rapporteur considers this approach outdated given the policy developments over the past 2 years and calls on the Commission to exempt all posts of all agencies dealing with the migration crisis from the 5% staff reduction target.
While not questioning the need for the considerable increases in appropriations and staff proposed by the Commission, the Rapporteur would like to underline that it should be avoided to create a super-agency with the potential of dominating all other home affairs agencies. The Rapporteur therefore expects from the Commission a similarly ambitious proposal for the further development of the European Asylum Support Office in the near future.
Given the considerable increase of the budget of Frontex over the past years and foreseen until 2020, the Rapporteur considers that it would be appropriate to change the budgetary nomenclature for the agency with regard to its operational expenditure. It should be ensured that the budgetary authority can exercise an influence on the operational priorities of the agency. The Rapporteur invites the Commission to already implement these changes to the nomenclature when presenting the Draft Budget for the financial year 2017.
The Rapporteur furthermore considers that the European Parliament deserves to play a stronger role in the appointment process of the Executive Director and introduced amendments in this respect, drawing on the example of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
The Rapporteur is also concerned that after more than 10 years there is still no Headquarters Agreement between Frontex and the Republic of Poland and calls on the competent authorities to finalise such agreement as soon as possible.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(33) The Commission and the Member States should be represented within a Management Board to exercise policy and political oversight over the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The Board should, where possible, consist of the operational heads of the national services responsible for border guard management or their representatives. This Board should be entrusted with the necessary powers to establish the budget, verify its execution, adopt the appropriate financial rules, establish transparent working procedures for decision making by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and appoint the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director. The Agency should be governed and operated in line with the principles of the common approach on Union decentralised agencies adopted on 19 July 2012 by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission. |
(33) The Commission and the Member States should be represented within a Management Board to exercise policy and political oversight over the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The Board should, where possible, consist of the operational heads of the national services responsible for border guard management or their representatives. This Board should be entrusted with the necessary powers to establish the budget, verify its execution, adopt the appropriate financial rules, establish transparent working procedures for decision making by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and appoint the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director. The Agency should be governed and operated in line with the principles of the common approach on Union decentralised agencies adopted on 19 July 2012 by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission. This includes the conclusion of a headquarters agreement between the Agency and the host country. |
Justification | |
There is still no headquarter agreement between Frontex and the Republic of Poland, even though Frontex exists for more than 10 years. Such an agreement needs to be concluded as soon as possible, and at the very latest three months after the entry into force of this regulation. | |
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
(34) In order to guarantee the autonomy of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, it should be granted an autonomous budget whose revenue comes essentially from a contribution from the Union. The Union budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Union contribution and any other subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the European Union are concerned. The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors. |
(34) In order to guarantee the autonomy of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, it should be granted an autonomous budget whose revenue comes essentially from a contribution from the Union. The Union budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Union contribution and any other subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the European Union are concerned. The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors. The budget adopted by the Management Board should be balanced in terms of addressing different aspects of the Agency's activities, including ensuring fundamental rights. |
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point m a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(ma) assist with the setting up of gender- and age-based facilities for migrants, taking account in particular of the specific situation of women and of unaccompanied minors; |
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. Detailed rules concerning the payment of the daily subsistence allowance of members of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams shall be established and updated as necessary by the Management Board. |
2. Detailed rules concerning the payment of the daily subsistence allowance of members of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams shall be established and updated as necessary by the Management Board on proposal from the Commission. |
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
2a. Concerning the above-mentioned costs incurred, VAT shall be eligible if not deductible. |
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. The European Border and Coast Guard shall, in the performance of its tasks, take into account the special needs of children, victims of trafficking in human beings, persons in need of medical assistance, persons in need of international protection, persons in distress at sea and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation. |
3. The European Border and Coast Guard shall, in the performance of its tasks, take into account the special needs of children, women, victims of trafficking in human beings, persons in need of medical assistance, persons in need of international protection, persons in distress at sea and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation. |
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. The tasks of the Agency’s liaison officers shall include, in compliance with Union law and in accordance with fundamental rights, establishing and maintaining contacts with the competent authorities of the third country to which they are assigned with a view to contributing to the prevention of and fight against irregular immigration and the return of illegally staying third-country nationals. Those liaison officers shall coordinate closely with Union delegations. |
3. The tasks of the Agency’s liaison officers shall include, in compliance with Union law and in accordance with fundamental rights, establishing and maintaining contacts with the competent authorities of the third country to which they are assigned with a view to contributing to the prevention of and fight against irregular immigration and the return of illegally staying third-country nationals. Those liaison officers shall coordinate closely with Union delegations and shall, wherever possible, have their offices in the same building. |
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 4 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
4. The decision to deploy liaison officers to third countries shall be subject to receiving a prior opinion of the Commission, and the European Parliament shall be fully informed of those activities as soon as possible. |
4. The decision to deploy liaison officers to third countries shall be subject to receiving a prior opinion of the Commission, and the European Parliament shall be fully informed of those activities and their financial consequences as soon as possible. |
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. The Member State in which the Agency has its seat shall provide the best possible conditions to ensure proper functioning of the Agency, including multilingual, European-oriented schooling and appropriate transport connections. |
3. The Member State in which the Agency has its seat shall provide the best possible conditions to ensure proper functioning of the Agency, including multilingual, European-oriented schooling and appropriate transport connections and shall ensure appropriate security measures for the Agency's staff and buildings. |
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
1a. The candidates proposed by the Commission shall then address the Council and the competent committee of the European Parliament and reply to questions, following which the European Parliament and the Council shall give their opinions and state their orders of preference which they transmit to the Management Board. |
Justification | |
The selection process should involve a hearing before the competent bodies in Parliament and Council. | |
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. The Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board on the grounds of merit and documented high-level administrative and management skills, as well as senior professional experience in the field of management of the external borders and return. The Management Board shall take its decision by a two-thirds majority of all members with a right to vote. |
2. Taking into account these opinions, the Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board on the grounds of merit and documented high-level administrative and management skills, as well as senior professional experience in the field of management of the external borders and return. The Management Board shall take its decision by a two-thirds majority of all members with a right to vote. |
Justification | |
The above-mentioned hearings need to be considered by the Management Board in its appointment decision. | |
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – introductory part | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. The revenue of the Agency shall consist, without prejudice to other types of income, of: |
1. The revenue of the Agency shall consist of: |
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
2a. In order to increase budgetary transparency the operational expenditure shall be presented in the Union budget through separate budget items per activity area. |
Justification | |
This is needed due to the increased budget available for the new Agency and its enhanced operational role. | |
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 7 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
7. The estimate shall be forwarded by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council (hereinafter referred to as the budgetary authority) together with the preliminary draft budget of the European Union. |
7. Upon receipt, the estimate shall be forwarded by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council (hereinafter referred to as the budgetary authority). |
Justification | |
a. The forwarding of the estimate should happen immediately. | |
b. There is no preliminary draft budget of the European Union. | |
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 13 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
13. In the view of financing the deployment of rapid border interventions and return interventions, the budget of the Agency adopted by the Management Board shall include a financial operational reserve amounting at least to 4% of the allocation foreseen for the operational activities. The reserve should be maintained throughout the year. |
13. In the view of financing the deployment of rapid border interventions and return interventions, the budget of the Agency adopted by the Management Board shall include a financial operational reserve amounting at least to 4% of the allocation foreseen for the operational activities. On 1 October each year, at least one-quarter of the reserve should remain available in order to cover needs arising until the end of the year. |
Justification | |
It does not make sense to maintain a reserve throughout the year as the idea of a reserve is that it can be used. However, in order to make sure that there is still some reserve available later in a financial year, it is suggested to define a minimum percentage that still needs to be available on1 October, in analogy to the provisions on the EU Solidarity Fund. | |
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Article 80 – paragraph 3 | |
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. On the occasion of every second evaluation, the Commission shall assess the results achieved by the Agency having regard to its objectives, mandate and tasks. |
deleted |
Justification | |
The content of this paragraph is covered largely by paragraph1. Furthermore, the full evaluation and assessment needs to be done every 3 years, given the volatile environment in this policy area. |
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
European Border and Coast Guard |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0671 – C8-0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
LIBE 21.1.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 21.1.2016 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Eider Gardiazabal Rubial 3.2.2016 |
||||
Date adopted |
26.4.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
25 2 2 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis, Jean-Paul Denanot, Gérard Deprez, José Manuel Fernandes, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Bernd Kölmel, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Vladimír Maňka, Ernest Maragall, Sophie Montel, Clare Moody, Siegfried Mureşan, Liadh Ní Riada, Jan Olbrycht, Younous Omarjee, Paul Rübig, Petri Sarvamaa, Patricija Šulin, Indrek Tarand, Inese Vaidere, Monika Vana, Daniele Viotti |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Andrey Novakov, Derek Vaughan, Anders Primdahl Vistisen, Tomáš Zdechovský |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Isabella Adinolfi, Anders Primdahl Vistisen |
||||
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries (20.4.2016)
for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC
(COM(2015)0671 – C8-0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD))
Rapporteur: Alain Cadec
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
As part of setting up the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, the Commission is proposing cooperation on coast guard functions (Article 52). An identical article has been incorporated into the mandates of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) and the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA). This amendment to the mandates of the three agencies provides the legal instrument required to strengthen cooperation between them and with national coast guard authorities.
The Committee on Fisheries wishes to reinforce the Commission proposal concerning only cooperation on 'coast guard functions' involving the EFCA. A definition of coast guard functions is in order to avoid confusion with the other missions of the three agencies and to clarify the scope of cooperation. The current system for cooperation on coast guard functions is beset by delays and drawbacks, such as the lack of information on the skills, capabilities and powers of other authorities, the limited number of operating assets, the lack of interoperability of systems and assets and deficiencies in planning and joint operations.
This proposal will coordinate marine monitoring, prevention and control operations at European level with a view to improving knowledge of the maritime situation and supporting coherent and cost-effective action. This cooperation will strengthen the EU's capacity to respond to maritime threats and risks, including by improving cooperation between both EU agencies and all other relevant stakeholders. It will also prevent duplications of effort by ensuring that stakeholders, particularly EU agencies, act in a consistent and effective manner with a view to developing synergies.
The proposal will enable the three agencies to support national authorities and to act jointly and effectively to help national authorities to carry out monitoring, security and surveillance operations by supplying equipment and training, exchanging of information and providing the necessary coordination of multidimensional operations. This cooperation is essential in the current context of major cross-border migration flows, which call for increased material and human solidarity on the part of the EU
The rapporteur strongly welcomes the proposal, which will bring the EFCA's powers into line with those of EMSA and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in respect of cooperation on coast guard functions only. If the capacities are national then they must necessarily be coordinated at European level.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Fisheries calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(18) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should have the necessary equipment and staff at its disposal to be deployed in joint operations or rapid border interventions. To this end, when launching rapid border interventions at the request of a Member State or in the context of a situation requiring urgent action, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be able to deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams from a rapid reserve pool which should be a standing corps composed of a small percentage of the total number of border guards in the Member States, which should amount to a minimum of 1 500. The deployment of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams from the rapid reserve pool should be immediately complemented by additional European Border and Coast Guard Teams as appropriate. |
(18) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should have the necessary equipment and staff at its disposal to be deployed in joint operations or rapid border interventions. To this end, when launching rapid border interventions at the request of a Member State or in the context of a situation requiring urgent action, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be able to deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams from a rapid reserve pool which should be a standing corps composed of a small percentage of the total number of border guards in the Member States, which should amount to a minimum of 1 500. Those teams should also include in their staff interpreters or fluent speakers of both the host Member State's language and the language mostly spoken by those they need to address. The deployment of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams from the rapid reserve pool should be immediately complemented by additional European Border and Coast Guard Teams as appropriate. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The influx of migrants has led to an increasing number of deaths at sea connected with travel in unseaworthy vessels. One of the many objectives of European cooperation on coast guard functions is to strengthen sea disaster prevention and rapid response capacities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(24) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should monitor and contribute to the developments in research relevant for the control of the external borders, including the use of advanced surveillance technology, and it should disseminate this information to the Member States and to the Commission. |
(24) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should monitor and contribute to the developments in research relevant for the control of the external borders, including the use of advanced surveillance technology, and it should disseminate this information to the Member States, the Commission and all other agencies involved, including the European Fisheries Control Agency. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
European cooperation on coast guard functions must be underpinned by, in particular, information systems and capabilities already available at EU level by building greater synergies between capacities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
European cooperation on coast guard functions does not aim to reduce the powers of the EFCA. Its mission is still to organise the operational coordination of the fisheries control and inspection activities of Member States in accordance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), so as to ensure the effective and uniform application of CFP rules. The aim of cooperation is to strengthen this first mission while establishing synergies to improve knowledge of the maritime situation and the EU's offshore response capability. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 14 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coast guard functions are not limited to monitoring the EU's borders in respect of migration; they can also entail supporting national authorities by providing services, information, equipment and training and by coordinating operations in various fields such as fisheries control and preventing marine pollution, piracy and trafficking of all kinds. This definition serves to clarify the scope of cooperation between coast guard functions referred to in Article 52. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(ra) assist in sharing the information, equipment and all other capabilities of the European Fisheries Control Agency and of the European Maritime Safety Agency, if their support is needed in order to perform specific tasks like, but not limited to, search and rescue. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. The Agency shall proactively monitor and contribute to research and innovation activities relevant for the control of the external borders, including the use of advanced surveillance technology such as remotely piloted aircraft systems, and for return. The Agency shall disseminate the results of that research to the Commission and the Member States. It may use those results as appropriate in joint operations, rapid border interventions, return operations and return interventions. |
1. The Agency shall proactively monitor and contribute to research and innovation activities relevant for the control of the external borders, including the use of advanced surveillance technology such as remotely piloted aircraft systems, and for return. The Agency shall disseminate the results of that research to the Commission and the Member States and to all other agencies involved, including the European Fisheries Control Agency. It may use those results as appropriate in joint operations, rapid border interventions, return operations and return interventions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Article 52 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
European cooperation on coast guard functions began as a result of the European Parliament pilot project for 2016. Parliament wishes to be informed of the results and synergies achieved through this project. |
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
European Border and Coast Guard |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0671 – C8-0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
LIBE 21.1.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
PECH 21.1.2016 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Alain Cadec 17.2.2016 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
22.3.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
19.4.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
15 6 2 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Marco Affronte, Clara Eugenia Aguilera García, Renata Briano, Alain Cadec, Richard Corbett, Diane Dodds, Linnéa Engström, Ian Hudghton, Carlos Iturgaiz, Werner Kuhn, Gabriel Mato, Norica Nicolai, Ulrike Rodust, Remo Sernagiotto, Ricardo Serrão Santos, Isabelle Thomas, Ruža Tomašić, Peter van Dalen, Jarosław Wałęsa |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Anja Hazekamp, Lidia Senra Rodríguez |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Laura Ferrara |
||||
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title |
European Border and Coast Guard |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0671 – C8-0408/2015 – 2015/0310(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
15.12.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
LIBE 21.1.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary |
AFET 21.1.2016 |
BUDG 21.1.2016 |
TRAN 21.1.2016 |
PECH 21.1.2016 |
|
Not delivering opinions Date of decision |
TRAN 12.5.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Artis Pabriks 29.2.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
29.2.2016 |
11.4.2016 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
30.5.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
40 10 5 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Martina Anderson, Malin Björk, Michał Boni, Caterina Chinnici, Rachida Dati, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Frank Engel, Tanja Fajon, Laura Ferrara, Monika Flašíková Beňová, Ana Gomes, Nathalie Griesbeck, Jussi Halla-aho, Monika Hohlmeier, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Timothy Kirkhope, Barbara Kudrycka, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Marju Lauristin, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Claude Moraes, Péter Niedermüller, Soraya Post, Birgit Sippel, Branislav Škripek, Csaba Sógor, Helga Stevens, Bodil Valero, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Beatrix von Storch, Josef Weidenholzer, Kristina Winberg |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Laura Agea, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Hugues Bayet, Carlos Coelho, Pál Csáky, Daniel Dalton, Ska Keller, Miltiadis Kyrkos, Artis Pabriks, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Salvatore Domenico Pogliese, Jaromír Štětina, Axel Voss |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Edouard Ferrand, Sylvie Goddyn, Peter Jahr, Othmar Karas, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Ádám Kósa, Keith Taylor, Lieve Wierinck |
||||
Date tabled |
6.6.2016 |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
40 |
+ |
|
ALDE |
Nathalie Griesbeck, Sophia in 't Veld, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Lieve Wierinck |
|
ECR |
Daniel Dalton, Jussi Halla-aho, Timothy Kirkhope, Branislav Škripek, Helga Stevens |
|
PPE |
Michał Boni, Carlos Coelho, Pál Csáky, Rachida Dati, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Frank Engel, Monika Hohlmeier, Peter Jahr, Othmar Karas, Barbara Kudrycka, Ádám Kósa, Artis Pabriks, Salvatore Domenico Pogliese, Jaromír Štětina, Csaba Sógor, Axel Voss |
|
S&D |
Hugues Bayet, Caterina Chinnici, Tanja Fajon, Monika Flašíková Beňová, Ana Gomes, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Miltiadis Kyrkos, Marju Lauristin, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Claude Moraes, Péter Niedermüller, Birgit Sippel, Josef Weidenholzer |
|
10 |
- |
|
EFDD |
Laura Agea, Laura Ferrara, Beatrix von Storch, Kristina Winberg |
|
ENF |
Edouard Ferrand, Sylvie Goddyn |
|
GUE/NGL |
Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson, Malin Björk, Marie-Christine Vergiat |
|
5 |
0 |
|
S&D |
Soraya Post |
|
Verts/ALE |
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Jan Keller, Keith Taylor, Bodil Valero |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention